Vicarious Consubstantiality: How Mike Pence Helped Save Donald Trump from Electoral Defeat

IF 1.4 Q2 COMMUNICATION
D. K. Merwin
{"title":"Vicarious Consubstantiality: How Mike Pence Helped Save Donald Trump from Electoral Defeat","authors":"D. K. Merwin","doi":"10.1080/10510974.2023.2191975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This essay is a close analysis of then Vice-Presidential nominee Mike Pence’s October 2016 speech in Charlotte, NC, where he aimed to rescue Donald Trump’s presidential campaign from the damaging impact of the Access Hollywood Tape. In his speech, I argue that Pence enacted what I call a vicarious consubstantiality, a form of consubstantiality taken from Kenneth Burke’s theories on identification and division that refer to a “one-ness” between people. As there were breaches in consubstantial bonds linking Trump to voters abandoning him in the wake of the Access Hollywood Tape, Pence served as a third party to re-establish these bonds. I suggest, in vicarious consubstantiality, that this third party must bridge differences by using key terms from a shared substance to define differences away from one party and toward another party – a shared enemy. This action demonstrates that the Burkean notion of consubstantiality is not only understood by how one party identifies with a second party, but how a third party can vicariously reestablish identification between two parties who sever ties.","PeriodicalId":47080,"journal":{"name":"Communication Studies","volume":"74 1","pages":"234 - 250"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communication Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2023.2191975","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This essay is a close analysis of then Vice-Presidential nominee Mike Pence’s October 2016 speech in Charlotte, NC, where he aimed to rescue Donald Trump’s presidential campaign from the damaging impact of the Access Hollywood Tape. In his speech, I argue that Pence enacted what I call a vicarious consubstantiality, a form of consubstantiality taken from Kenneth Burke’s theories on identification and division that refer to a “one-ness” between people. As there were breaches in consubstantial bonds linking Trump to voters abandoning him in the wake of the Access Hollywood Tape, Pence served as a third party to re-establish these bonds. I suggest, in vicarious consubstantiality, that this third party must bridge differences by using key terms from a shared substance to define differences away from one party and toward another party – a shared enemy. This action demonstrates that the Burkean notion of consubstantiality is not only understood by how one party identifies with a second party, but how a third party can vicariously reestablish identification between two parties who sever ties.
替代性同质性:迈克·彭斯如何帮助唐纳德·特朗普避免选举失败
摘要本文对时任副总统候选人迈克·彭斯2016年10月在北卡罗来纳州夏洛特市的演讲进行了仔细分析,他在演讲中旨在将唐纳德·特朗普的总统竞选活动从《走进好莱坞》磁带的破坏性影响中拯救出来。在他的演讲中,我认为彭斯制定了我所说的替代同体性,这是一种取自肯尼斯·伯克关于身份认同和分裂的理论的同体性形式,指的是人与人之间的“一体性”。由于在《走进好莱坞录像带》之后,将特朗普与抛弃他的选民联系起来的间接纽带出现了漏洞,彭斯充当了重新建立这些纽带的第三方。我以间接的同体性建议,这个第三方必须通过使用共同物质中的关键术语来定义与一方和另一方——共同敌人——之间的差异,从而弥合分歧。这一行动表明,Burkean的同体性概念不仅可以通过一方如何与第二方认同来理解,还可以通过第三方如何在断绝关系的双方之间替代性地重新建立认同来理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Communication Studies
Communication Studies COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
6.20%
发文量
26
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信