Positive Psychology Research in the Philippines: An Introduction

J. A. Datu, Allan B. I. Bernardo, Ronnel B. King
{"title":"Positive Psychology Research in the Philippines: An Introduction","authors":"J. A. Datu, Allan B. I. Bernardo, Ronnel B. King","doi":"10.31710/PJP/0051.01.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the past two decades, advances in positive psychology has resulted in an exponential increase in the number of studies concentrating on the dispositional, interpersonal, and socio-contextual factors which can optimize adaptive psychological and well-being outcomes. However, most of these investigations have focused on expanding the science of positive traits, states, and institutions in Western cultural contexts. The generalizability and applicability of these Western models have to be scrutinized and reconsidered when they are transported to different cultural settings. There is also a need to come up with emic studies that closely reflect the lived experience of peoples across cultures. In recent years, there has been a burgeoning interest in crosscultural studies that include samples from non-Western cultures including the Philippines (see Church et al., 2014; Kuppens, Realo, & Diener, 2008; McGrath, 2015). There has been some noticeable increase in positive psychology research in Asian cultural contexts (see Caleon, King, et al., 2017; Caleon, Wui, et al., 2017; Duan, Ho, Tang, Li, & Zhang, 2014; Kumano, 2018; Low, King, & Caleon, 2016) including the Philippines (see King & Datu, 2017; Mesurado, Richaud, & Mateo, 2016; Rosopa, Datu, Robertson, & Atkinson, 2016). Given the critical role that sociocultural factors play in shaping well-being and optimal functioning (Steel, Taras, Uggerslev, & Bosco, 2018; Tov & Diener, 2009), it is important to investigate how positive psychological factors can serve as either antecedents or consequences of optimal psychological functioning in specific cultural contexts. Positive Psychology Research in the Philippines: An Introduction","PeriodicalId":90678,"journal":{"name":"Philippine journal of psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philippine journal of psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31710/PJP/0051.01.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Over the past two decades, advances in positive psychology has resulted in an exponential increase in the number of studies concentrating on the dispositional, interpersonal, and socio-contextual factors which can optimize adaptive psychological and well-being outcomes. However, most of these investigations have focused on expanding the science of positive traits, states, and institutions in Western cultural contexts. The generalizability and applicability of these Western models have to be scrutinized and reconsidered when they are transported to different cultural settings. There is also a need to come up with emic studies that closely reflect the lived experience of peoples across cultures. In recent years, there has been a burgeoning interest in crosscultural studies that include samples from non-Western cultures including the Philippines (see Church et al., 2014; Kuppens, Realo, & Diener, 2008; McGrath, 2015). There has been some noticeable increase in positive psychology research in Asian cultural contexts (see Caleon, King, et al., 2017; Caleon, Wui, et al., 2017; Duan, Ho, Tang, Li, & Zhang, 2014; Kumano, 2018; Low, King, & Caleon, 2016) including the Philippines (see King & Datu, 2017; Mesurado, Richaud, & Mateo, 2016; Rosopa, Datu, Robertson, & Atkinson, 2016). Given the critical role that sociocultural factors play in shaping well-being and optimal functioning (Steel, Taras, Uggerslev, & Bosco, 2018; Tov & Diener, 2009), it is important to investigate how positive psychological factors can serve as either antecedents or consequences of optimal psychological functioning in specific cultural contexts. Positive Psychology Research in the Philippines: An Introduction
菲律宾积极心理学研究导论
在过去的二十年里,积极心理学的进步导致专注于性格、人际和社会背景因素的研究数量呈指数级增长,这些因素可以优化适应性心理和幸福感结果。然而,这些调查大多集中在扩展西方文化背景下积极特征、状态和制度的科学。当这些西方模式被转移到不同的文化环境中时,必须仔细审查和重新考虑它们的可推广性和适用性。还需要进行流行病研究,密切反映不同文化背景下人们的生活经历。近年来,人们对包括菲律宾在内的非西方文化样本的跨文化研究越来越感兴趣(见Church等人,2014;Kuppens、Realo和Diener,2008年;麦格拉斯,2015年)。在亚洲文化背景下,积极心理学研究显著增加(见Caleon,King等人,2017;Caleon,Wui等人,2017年;段、何、唐、李和张,2014;熊野,2018;Low、King和Caleon,2016),包括菲律宾(见King和Datu,2017;Mesurado、Richaud和Mateo,2016;Rosopa、Datu、Robertson和Atkinson,2016)。鉴于社会文化因素在塑造幸福感和最佳功能方面发挥着关键作用(Steel,Taras,Uggerslev,&Bosco,2018;Tov&Diener,2009),研究积极的心理因素在特定文化背景下如何作为最佳心理功能的前因或后果是很重要的。菲律宾积极心理学研究导论
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书