Assessment of Sleep Duration and Number of Awakenings Based on Ankle and Wrist Actigraphy in Medical Hospitalized Older Patients

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
J. Smichenko, T. Shochat, A. Zisberg
{"title":"Assessment of Sleep Duration and Number of Awakenings Based on Ankle and Wrist Actigraphy in Medical Hospitalized Older Patients","authors":"J. Smichenko, T. Shochat, A. Zisberg","doi":"10.1177/10998004221095567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Most studies performed in the hospital assess sleep using self-reports; few rely on actigraphy. Although wrist actigraphy is commonly used for sleep assessment in field studies, in-hospital assessment may be challenging and cumbersome because other more necessary monitoring devices are often attached to patients’ upper limbs; these may affect interpretation of wrist activity data. Placement on the ankle may be a viable solution. Objective To compare total sleep time (TST) and number of awakenings (NOA) using concomitant wrist and ankle actigraphy, as well as self-reports in a sample of older adult patients hospitalized in medical units. Methods This was a prospective observational study. Objective sleep data were collected using ankle and wrist actigraphy, and subjective data using sleep diary. Repeated measures mixed model analysis was performed, adjusting for age, gender, sleep medications, symptoms severity, interaction between types of measure, and night number. Results Twenty-one older adults (65+) wore ankle and wrist actigraphy devices and subjectively estimated sleep parameters for an average of (2.15 ± 1.01) nights, with 40 nights available for analysis. TST was lower for wrist than ankle actigraphy (F(2,87) = 7.92, p = .0007). Neither differed from self-reports. NOA differed between all types of measure (ankle, 8.58 ± 6.66; wrist, 15.49 ± 7.47; self-report, 1.81 ± 1.83; F(2,85) = 47.66, p < .001). No significant within-subject variations and no interaction between devices and repeated measures were found. Conclusions Despite differences between ankle and wrist assessments, all three methods provided consistent TST estimation within participants. Findings provide preliminary support for the use of ankle actigraphy for sleep assessment in hospital settings.","PeriodicalId":8997,"journal":{"name":"Biological research for nursing","volume":"24 1","pages":"448 - 458"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological research for nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10998004221095567","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Most studies performed in the hospital assess sleep using self-reports; few rely on actigraphy. Although wrist actigraphy is commonly used for sleep assessment in field studies, in-hospital assessment may be challenging and cumbersome because other more necessary monitoring devices are often attached to patients’ upper limbs; these may affect interpretation of wrist activity data. Placement on the ankle may be a viable solution. Objective To compare total sleep time (TST) and number of awakenings (NOA) using concomitant wrist and ankle actigraphy, as well as self-reports in a sample of older adult patients hospitalized in medical units. Methods This was a prospective observational study. Objective sleep data were collected using ankle and wrist actigraphy, and subjective data using sleep diary. Repeated measures mixed model analysis was performed, adjusting for age, gender, sleep medications, symptoms severity, interaction between types of measure, and night number. Results Twenty-one older adults (65+) wore ankle and wrist actigraphy devices and subjectively estimated sleep parameters for an average of (2.15 ± 1.01) nights, with 40 nights available for analysis. TST was lower for wrist than ankle actigraphy (F(2,87) = 7.92, p = .0007). Neither differed from self-reports. NOA differed between all types of measure (ankle, 8.58 ± 6.66; wrist, 15.49 ± 7.47; self-report, 1.81 ± 1.83; F(2,85) = 47.66, p < .001). No significant within-subject variations and no interaction between devices and repeated measures were found. Conclusions Despite differences between ankle and wrist assessments, all three methods provided consistent TST estimation within participants. Findings provide preliminary support for the use of ankle actigraphy for sleep assessment in hospital settings.
基于踝关节和腕关节活动的老年患者睡眠时间和觉醒次数评估
背景:大多数在医院进行的研究使用自我报告来评估睡眠;很少有人依靠活动描记术。尽管腕部活动记录仪在实地研究中通常用于睡眠评估,但住院评估可能具有挑战性和繁琐性,因为其他更必要的监测设备通常附着在患者的上肢上;这些可能会影响手腕活动数据的解释。放置在脚踝上可能是一个可行的解决方案。目的比较采用腕踝联合活动记录仪的老年住院患者的总睡眠时间(TST)、觉醒次数(NOA)及自我报告。方法前瞻性观察性研究。客观睡眠数据采用踝部和腕部活动记录仪采集,主观睡眠数据采用睡眠日记采集。进行重复测量混合模型分析,调整年龄、性别、睡眠药物、症状严重程度、测量类型之间的相互作用和夜间次数。结果21名老年人(65岁以上)佩戴踝部和腕部活动记录仪,主观估计睡眠参数平均为(2.15±1.01)晚,其中40晚可供分析。腕部TST低于踝部(F(2,87) = 7.92, p = 0.0007)。两者都与自我报告不同。不同测量方式的NOA差异较大(踝关节,8.58±6.66;手腕,15.49±7.47;自我报告,1.81±1.83;F(2,85) = 47.66, p < 0.001)。没有发现受试者内部的显著变化,也没有发现设备和重复测量之间的相互作用。结论:尽管踝关节和手腕评估存在差异,但所有三种方法在参与者中提供了一致的TST估计。研究结果为在医院环境中使用踝部活动记录仪进行睡眠评估提供了初步支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Biological Research For Nursing (BRN) is a peer-reviewed quarterly journal that helps nurse researchers, educators, and practitioners integrate information from many basic disciplines; biology, physiology, chemistry, health policy, business, engineering, education, communication and the social sciences into nursing research, theory and clinical practice. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信