Domestic Workers and the Employer-Employee Relationship in Delhi

Alexis Pramberger
{"title":"Domestic Workers and the Employer-Employee Relationship in Delhi","authors":"Alexis Pramberger","doi":"10.15695/VURJ.V11I1.5100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A. The Indian Context There are approximately four to five million domestic workers in India today who are part of India’s unorganized and unregulated workforce, the sector which includes 94% of all workers. (National Domestic Workers Movement, 2016). Workers in the unorganized sector lack job security, anti-harassment infrastructure, and reassurance of safe working conditions due to lack of legislative regulation. Unlike workers in the organized sector, domestic workers do not have social securities such as medical leave, insurance, pension, or minimum wages (DW Advocate A, personal communication, April 23, 2020). Workers are vulnerable to the breaching of informal contracts, unsafe and unregulated working environments, and power differences in the employee-employer relationship which limit power in facing abuse (Rights for Domestic Workers, n.d.; DW Advocate A, personal communication, April 23, 2020). Between the end of the 20st century and 2011-2012, the number of domestic workers in India increased fourfold (John, 2019). Data on domestic workers is sparse because A) domestic work is seen as illegitimate and considered extension of the household, B) many workers are part time, so they do not register domestic work as their primary occupation, and C) because there is little government-mandated data collection for the sector (Sahni & Junnarkar, 2019). Currently, most middle to upper class households traditionally employ at least one domestic worker. As traditional","PeriodicalId":93630,"journal":{"name":"Vanderbilt undergraduate research journal : VURJ","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vanderbilt undergraduate research journal : VURJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15695/VURJ.V11I1.5100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A. The Indian Context There are approximately four to five million domestic workers in India today who are part of India’s unorganized and unregulated workforce, the sector which includes 94% of all workers. (National Domestic Workers Movement, 2016). Workers in the unorganized sector lack job security, anti-harassment infrastructure, and reassurance of safe working conditions due to lack of legislative regulation. Unlike workers in the organized sector, domestic workers do not have social securities such as medical leave, insurance, pension, or minimum wages (DW Advocate A, personal communication, April 23, 2020). Workers are vulnerable to the breaching of informal contracts, unsafe and unregulated working environments, and power differences in the employee-employer relationship which limit power in facing abuse (Rights for Domestic Workers, n.d.; DW Advocate A, personal communication, April 23, 2020). Between the end of the 20st century and 2011-2012, the number of domestic workers in India increased fourfold (John, 2019). Data on domestic workers is sparse because A) domestic work is seen as illegitimate and considered extension of the household, B) many workers are part time, so they do not register domestic work as their primary occupation, and C) because there is little government-mandated data collection for the sector (Sahni & Junnarkar, 2019). Currently, most middle to upper class households traditionally employ at least one domestic worker. As traditional
德里的家政工人与雇主-雇员关系
今天,印度大约有400万到500万家政工人是印度无组织和不受监管的劳动力的一部分,这一部门占所有工人的94%。(全国家政工人运动,2016)。由于缺乏立法规定,无组织部门的工人缺乏工作保障、反骚扰基础设施和安全工作条件的保证。与有组织部门的工人不同,家庭佣工没有医疗休假、保险、养老金或最低工资等社会保障(DW Advocate A,个人通讯,2020年4月23日)。工人很容易违反非正式合同,不安全和不受管制的工作环境,以及雇员-雇主关系中的权力差异,这些都限制了他们面对虐待的权力(家庭工人的权利,n.d;DW倡导者A,个人传播,2020年4月23日)。从20世纪末到2011-2012年,印度的家政工人数量增加了四倍(John, 2019)。关于家政工人的数据很少,因为A)家政工作被视为非法并被视为家庭的延伸,B)许多工人是兼职的,因此他们没有将家政工作登记为主要职业,C)因为政府很少强制收集该部门的数据(Sahni & Junnarkar, 2019)。目前,大多数中上层阶级家庭传统上至少雇用一名家庭佣工。随着传统
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信