Healthy volunteer profile: Levels of anxiety, depression, socioeconomic aspects and candidates’ motivations of participation in phase I clinical trials

IF 0.5 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Andreé Salvatierra , Iris Lioba , Marta Pérez , Julian Mateus , Santiago Grau , Ana Aldea-Perona
{"title":"Healthy volunteer profile: Levels of anxiety, depression, socioeconomic aspects and candidates’ motivations of participation in phase I clinical trials","authors":"Andreé Salvatierra ,&nbsp;Iris Lioba ,&nbsp;Marta Pérez ,&nbsp;Julian Mateus ,&nbsp;Santiago Grau ,&nbsp;Ana Aldea-Perona","doi":"10.1016/j.anyes.2020.03.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Healthy volunteers participate in phase I clinical trials mainly in search of an economic compensation; their economic instability may constitute a vulnerability factor for anxiety/depression.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To select suitable and rapid screening tests for anxiety and depression in healthy volunteers, to know their socioeconomic situation and to identify the main reason for their participation.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Cross-sectional study, under a nonparametric statistical analysis and ROC curve analysis. Goldberg's Anxiety and Depression Scale (GADS) (fast test) and the Beck Depression (BDI-II) and Anxiety (BAI) Inventories (standard tests) were applied to all participants.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>One hundred and thirty-nine potential candidates were recruited; the average age was 32 years (<em>SD</em> = 8.8); 53.9% were students, 43.9% employers and 2.2% were unemployed; 85.6% had university studies, 13.7% secondary education and .7% primary studies. GADS, BDI-II and BAI results were: 24.5% volunteered with anxiety and 15.8% with depression (GADS); anxiety levels (BAI): 60.4% had null, 25.9% mild, 11.5% moderate and 2.2% severe; depression (BDI-II): 87.8% had null, 5.8% mild, 5.8% moderate and .7% severe. Socioeconomic characteristics: 48.2% low stratum, 43.2% medium, 5.7% medium high and 2.8% high. Motivations: 46.1% for economic compensation, 35.9% contribution to science, 14.4% for curiosity and 3.6% access to health.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>GADS shows insufficient capacity to discriminate between anxiety/depression and the use of BAI and BDI-II is suggested; anxiety and depression levels were higher in healthy volunteers than the prevalence in the general population but lower when compared to university population; employment status was mostly composed of university students with low socioeconomic characteristics and a high economic motivation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45616,"journal":{"name":"Ansiedad y Estres-Anxiety and Stress","volume":"26 2","pages":"Pages 83-90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.anyes.2020.03.003","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ansiedad y Estres-Anxiety and Stress","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1134793720300221","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Healthy volunteers participate in phase I clinical trials mainly in search of an economic compensation; their economic instability may constitute a vulnerability factor for anxiety/depression.

Objectives

To select suitable and rapid screening tests for anxiety and depression in healthy volunteers, to know their socioeconomic situation and to identify the main reason for their participation.

Methods

Cross-sectional study, under a nonparametric statistical analysis and ROC curve analysis. Goldberg's Anxiety and Depression Scale (GADS) (fast test) and the Beck Depression (BDI-II) and Anxiety (BAI) Inventories (standard tests) were applied to all participants.

Results

One hundred and thirty-nine potential candidates were recruited; the average age was 32 years (SD = 8.8); 53.9% were students, 43.9% employers and 2.2% were unemployed; 85.6% had university studies, 13.7% secondary education and .7% primary studies. GADS, BDI-II and BAI results were: 24.5% volunteered with anxiety and 15.8% with depression (GADS); anxiety levels (BAI): 60.4% had null, 25.9% mild, 11.5% moderate and 2.2% severe; depression (BDI-II): 87.8% had null, 5.8% mild, 5.8% moderate and .7% severe. Socioeconomic characteristics: 48.2% low stratum, 43.2% medium, 5.7% medium high and 2.8% high. Motivations: 46.1% for economic compensation, 35.9% contribution to science, 14.4% for curiosity and 3.6% access to health.

Conclusions

GADS shows insufficient capacity to discriminate between anxiety/depression and the use of BAI and BDI-II is suggested; anxiety and depression levels were higher in healthy volunteers than the prevalence in the general population but lower when compared to university population; employment status was mostly composed of university students with low socioeconomic characteristics and a high economic motivation.

健康志愿者概况:焦虑、抑郁、社会经济方面的水平和候选人参与I期临床试验的动机
健康志愿者参加I期临床试验主要是为了寻求经济补偿;他们的经济不稳定可能构成焦虑/抑郁的脆弱因素。目的为健康志愿者选择合适的、快速的焦虑抑郁筛查方法,了解其社会经济状况,确定其参与的主要原因。方法横断面研究,采用非参数统计分析和ROC曲线分析。戈德堡焦虑抑郁量表(GADS)(快速测试)和贝克抑郁量表(BDI-II)和焦虑量表(BAI)(标准测试)应用于所有参与者。结果共招募到潜在候选人139人;平均年龄32岁(SD = 8.8);53.9%为学生,43.9%为雇主,2.2%为失业者;85.6%有大学学历,13.7%有中学学历,0.7%有小学学历。GADS、BDI-II和BAI结果:24.5%的志愿者患有焦虑,15.8%的志愿者患有抑郁(GADS);焦虑水平(BAI): 60.4%为零,25.9%为轻度,11.5%为中度,2.2%为重度;抑郁症(BDI-II): 87.8%为零,轻度5.8%,中度5.8%,重度0.7%。社会经济特征:下层48.2%,中等43.2%,中高5.7%,高2.8%。动机:46.1%为经济补偿,35.9%为科学贡献,14.4%为好奇心,3.6%为获得健康。结论sgads对焦虑/抑郁的区分能力不足,建议使用BAI和BDI-II;健康志愿者的焦虑和抑郁水平高于普通人群,但低于大学人群;就业状态主要由低社会经济特征和高经济动机的大学生组成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ansiedad y Estres-Anxiety and Stress
Ansiedad y Estres-Anxiety and Stress PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
8.30%
发文量
7
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信