Cropping systems with perennial vegetation and livestock integration promote soil health

IF 2.3 4区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Abigail J. Augarten, Lindsay Chamberlain Malone, Gregory S. Richardson, Randall D. Jackson, Michel A. Wattiaux, Shawn P. Conley, Amber M. Radatz, Eric T. Cooley, Matthew D. Ruark
{"title":"Cropping systems with perennial vegetation and livestock integration promote soil health","authors":"Abigail J. Augarten,&nbsp;Lindsay Chamberlain Malone,&nbsp;Gregory S. Richardson,&nbsp;Randall D. Jackson,&nbsp;Michel A. Wattiaux,&nbsp;Shawn P. Conley,&nbsp;Amber M. Radatz,&nbsp;Eric T. Cooley,&nbsp;Matthew D. Ruark","doi":"10.1002/ael2.20100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Soil health can differ across cropping systems because of variation in edaphic and management factors. We evaluated how biological indicators of soil health (soil organic matter [SOM], permanganate oxidizable carbon [POXC], mineralizable carbon [MinC], autoclaved-citrate-extractable [ACE] protein, and potentially mineralizable nitrogen [PMN]) compared across four common Wisconsin cropping systems: grazed cool-season pastures, forage-based rotations that included perennial legumes or grasses, annual rotations receiving manure, and annual rotations receiving synthetic fertilizers. Biological indicators of soil health were up to 195% greater in pastures than other cropping systems. MinC, POXC and PMN were 10%–90% greater in forage-based rotations than annual cropping systems, but only MinC and POXC were greater in annual systems with manure compared to those without manure by 35% and 7%, respectively. Perennial vegetation and livestock integration offer the greatest potential to increase biological indicators of soil health in agricultural lands.</p>","PeriodicalId":48502,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural & Environmental Letters","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ael2.20100","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural & Environmental Letters","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ael2.20100","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Soil health can differ across cropping systems because of variation in edaphic and management factors. We evaluated how biological indicators of soil health (soil organic matter [SOM], permanganate oxidizable carbon [POXC], mineralizable carbon [MinC], autoclaved-citrate-extractable [ACE] protein, and potentially mineralizable nitrogen [PMN]) compared across four common Wisconsin cropping systems: grazed cool-season pastures, forage-based rotations that included perennial legumes or grasses, annual rotations receiving manure, and annual rotations receiving synthetic fertilizers. Biological indicators of soil health were up to 195% greater in pastures than other cropping systems. MinC, POXC and PMN were 10%–90% greater in forage-based rotations than annual cropping systems, but only MinC and POXC were greater in annual systems with manure compared to those without manure by 35% and 7%, respectively. Perennial vegetation and livestock integration offer the greatest potential to increase biological indicators of soil health in agricultural lands.

Abstract Image

具有多年生植被和牲畜一体化的种植系统促进土壤健康
由于土壤和管理因素的差异,不同种植制度的土壤健康状况可能有所不同。我们评估了土壤健康的生物指标(土壤有机质[SOM]、高锰酸盐可氧化碳[POXC]、矿化碳[MinC]、蒸压柠檬酸盐可萃取蛋白质[ACE]和潜在矿化氮[PMN])在四种常见的威斯康星州种植系统中的比较:放牧冷季牧场、牧草轮作(包括多年生豆科植物或禾本科)、每年轮作粪肥和每年轮作合成肥料。放牧土壤健康生物指标比其他耕作制度高195%。草料轮作系统的MinC、POXC和PMN比一年生轮作系统高10% ~ 90%,但一年生轮作系统中只有MinC和POXC比一年生轮作系统分别高35%和7%。多年生植被和牲畜的结合为提高农业用地土壤健康的生物指标提供了最大的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
3.80%
发文量
28
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信