{"title":"URGENSI PEMIDANAAN KORPORASI PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA PERIKANAN MENGGUNAKAN PERATURAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR 13 TAHUN 2016","authors":"Budi Suhariyanto","doi":"10.15578/JKPI.10.1.2018.25-32","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Undang-undang Perikanan Indonesia memiliki kelemahan dalam pengaturan pertanggungjawaban pidana korporasi sehingga menimbulkan multitafsir dan menyulitkan penegak hukum dalam memidana korporasi pelaku tindak pidana perikanan. Mahkamah Agung telah memberlakukan Peraturan Mahkamah Agung (PERMA) Nomor 13 Tahun 2016 yang mengatur tata cara penanganan perkara tindak pidana oleh korporasi. Kajian dilakukan untuk mendalami urgensi pemidanaan korporasi pelaku tindak pidana perikanan menggunakan PERMA Nomor 13 Tahun 2016. Metode penelitian hukum normatif digunakan untuk keperluan tersebut, dengan menggunakan analsis yuridis kualitatif. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa PERMA Nomor 13 Tahun 2016 dapat diberlakukan dalam rangka mengisi kekosongan hukum acara pidana korporasi dalam UU Perikanan.Indonesian Fisheries Laws are not explicitly mention about the corporation responsibilities so that it is difficult for the Court to convict the related and responsible corporations. The Supreme Court has already launched the Supreme Court Regulation No. 13/2016 that systematically legalize the way to deal with any felonies and crimes conducted by corporation. This study was then directed toward identifying to what extend this Supreme Court Regulation could appropriately be applied in dealing with crimes by fisheries corporations. Normative Law research method was applied for this purposes. By implementing Qualitative judicial analysis. The analysis showed that Supreme Court Regulation No. 13/2016 could be implemented accordingly to fill the gap found in Indonesian Fisheries Law.","PeriodicalId":31078,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Kebijakan Perikanan Indonesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Kebijakan Perikanan Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15578/JKPI.10.1.2018.25-32","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
Undang-undang Perikanan Indonesia memiliki kelemahan dalam pengaturan pertanggungjawaban pidana korporasi sehingga menimbulkan multitafsir dan menyulitkan penegak hukum dalam memidana korporasi pelaku tindak pidana perikanan. Mahkamah Agung telah memberlakukan Peraturan Mahkamah Agung (PERMA) Nomor 13 Tahun 2016 yang mengatur tata cara penanganan perkara tindak pidana oleh korporasi. Kajian dilakukan untuk mendalami urgensi pemidanaan korporasi pelaku tindak pidana perikanan menggunakan PERMA Nomor 13 Tahun 2016. Metode penelitian hukum normatif digunakan untuk keperluan tersebut, dengan menggunakan analsis yuridis kualitatif. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa PERMA Nomor 13 Tahun 2016 dapat diberlakukan dalam rangka mengisi kekosongan hukum acara pidana korporasi dalam UU Perikanan.Indonesian Fisheries Laws are not explicitly mention about the corporation responsibilities so that it is difficult for the Court to convict the related and responsible corporations. The Supreme Court has already launched the Supreme Court Regulation No. 13/2016 that systematically legalize the way to deal with any felonies and crimes conducted by corporation. This study was then directed toward identifying to what extend this Supreme Court Regulation could appropriately be applied in dealing with crimes by fisheries corporations. Normative Law research method was applied for this purposes. By implementing Qualitative judicial analysis. The analysis showed that Supreme Court Regulation No. 13/2016 could be implemented accordingly to fill the gap found in Indonesian Fisheries Law.