Validación de un Inventario de Comportamientos Agresivos en el Tránsito

Gabriel Dorantes Argandar
{"title":"Validación de un Inventario de Comportamientos Agresivos en el Tránsito","authors":"Gabriel Dorantes Argandar","doi":"10.33670/18181023.V16I01.256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over 20000 people die due to car accidents (Cervantes-Trejo, 2009). Moreover, other 700000 suffer injuries that result in hospitalization, as well as 40000 individuals end up with some sort of disability (Cervantes-Trejo, 2009). Alarmingly, Cervantes-Trejo (2009) reported that this problematic is rising every year. Aggressive driving is one of the main causes of traffic accidents. In this study, aggressive driving is defined in terms of inconsiderateness towards others, risky driving and frustration/hostility behaviors. The aim of this study was to create and validate an instrument to assess the construct. We intended to answer the following research question: Is the Aggressive Driving Behavior Inventory valid and reliable? This is a local validation study in Cuernavaca, Morelos in Mexico. We carried out three studies sampling 2454 participants. In the first study, we found more items in the dimension frustration/hostility behaviors rather than the ones in the other dimensions. In the second one, we discovered a high construct validity and acceptable internal consistency of the instrument. In the third one, we found that the measure obtained a high construct validity and good internal consistency. Nonetheless, we didn’t assess the content, convergent and divergent validity. We concluded that the Aggressive Driving Behavior Inventory is valid measure but needs further assessment of its psychometric soundness in a representative sample.","PeriodicalId":30020,"journal":{"name":"Revista Internacional de Psicologia","volume":"16 1","pages":"1-57"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Internacional de Psicologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33670/18181023.V16I01.256","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Over 20000 people die due to car accidents (Cervantes-Trejo, 2009). Moreover, other 700000 suffer injuries that result in hospitalization, as well as 40000 individuals end up with some sort of disability (Cervantes-Trejo, 2009). Alarmingly, Cervantes-Trejo (2009) reported that this problematic is rising every year. Aggressive driving is one of the main causes of traffic accidents. In this study, aggressive driving is defined in terms of inconsiderateness towards others, risky driving and frustration/hostility behaviors. The aim of this study was to create and validate an instrument to assess the construct. We intended to answer the following research question: Is the Aggressive Driving Behavior Inventory valid and reliable? This is a local validation study in Cuernavaca, Morelos in Mexico. We carried out three studies sampling 2454 participants. In the first study, we found more items in the dimension frustration/hostility behaviors rather than the ones in the other dimensions. In the second one, we discovered a high construct validity and acceptable internal consistency of the instrument. In the third one, we found that the measure obtained a high construct validity and good internal consistency. Nonetheless, we didn’t assess the content, convergent and divergent validity. We concluded that the Aggressive Driving Behavior Inventory is valid measure but needs further assessment of its psychometric soundness in a representative sample.
验证过境攻击行为清单
超过20000人死于车祸(Cervantes-Trejo,2009年)。此外,还有70万人受伤住院治疗,还有4万人最终患上某种残疾(Cervantes-Trejo,2009)。令人担忧的是,Cervantes-Trejo(2009)报告称,这种问题每年都在增加。激进驾驶是造成交通事故的主要原因之一。在这项研究中,攻击性驾驶被定义为对他人不体贴、危险驾驶和沮丧/敌意行为。本研究的目的是创建并验证一种评估结构的工具。我们打算回答以下研究问题:攻击性驾驶行为量表是否有效和可靠?这是墨西哥莫雷洛斯州Cuernavaca的一项当地验证研究。我们对2454名参与者进行了三项研究。在第一项研究中,我们发现挫折/敌意行为维度的项目比其他维度的项目更多。在第二部分中,我们发现了该工具具有较高的结构有效性和可接受的内部一致性。在第三章中,我们发现该测度获得了较高的结构有效性和良好的内部一致性。尽管如此,我们没有评估内容、收敛有效性和发散有效性。我们得出结论,攻击性驾驶行为量表是有效的衡量标准,但需要在代表性样本中进一步评估其心理测量的稳健性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书