Jewish Education and the Potential for Change

IF 0.2 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Jonathan B. Krasner
{"title":"Jewish Education and the Potential for Change","authors":"Jonathan B. Krasner","doi":"10.1080/15244113.2022.2038000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"John F. Kennedy once called change “the law of life.” But its inevitability does not make change any easier. Institutions can be especially resistant to change, and educational institutions more than most. Change, with all its possibilities and obstacles to fruition, was on my mind as I reviewed the articles in the present issue of the Journal of Jewish Education. Let us begin with the articles in this issue that round out our special focus on “Jewish Education in the Time of COVID-19,” which began in our previous issue. Larry Cuban and David Tyack's 1995 book, Tinkering Toward Utopia, about the intractability of the “grammar of schooling,” the ways in which public schools have largely been impervious to a century of reform initiatives, seemed particularly relevant while reading Isa Aron and Ziva Hassenfeld's article, “Going Beyond Zoom to Enrich Learning in a Part-time Jewish School.” The authors explore how part-time congregational school teachers utilized technology as a pedagogical tool in the midst of the pandemic, particularly during the first few waves, when most schools were forced to migrate to online education. In particular, Aron and Hassenfeld offer a case study of two exemplary practitioners, describing specific lessons where these educators went beyond the functionalities provided by Zoom and utilized apps and Web 2.0 technologies in ways that allowed them to make online Jewish education more participatory and learner-centered. The authors also ask why these teachers were able to use technology so adeptly, even while the vast majority of their colleagues settled into a routine of frontal teaching on Zoom with the occasional use of breakout rooms and the polling function. Here is where Cuban and Tyack's work becomes relevant. Even with professional development and other support from a local Jewish educational agency there was very little change on the ground. Aron and Hassenfeld make a strong case for the integration of TPACK (technological pedagogical content knowledge) theory into the curricula of Jewish educator training programs. But they also acknowledge that the two teachers that they profiled were atypical in their degree of tech-savviness, penchant for creativity, and level of preparation for teaching. While the authors are optimistic that as more teachers become tech-savvy they will engage in “self-directed professional development” on the web, a century of failed school reforms in the public school and Jewish educational institutions points to a different possible outcome. Being a digital native does not necessarily endow a teacher with the mindset or skills to create impactful learning environments any more than knowing how to thread the film on JOURNAL OF JEWISH EDUCATION 2022, VOL. 88, NO. 1, 1–4 https://doi.org/10.1080/15244113.2022.2038000","PeriodicalId":42565,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Jewish Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Jewish Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15244113.2022.2038000","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

John F. Kennedy once called change “the law of life.” But its inevitability does not make change any easier. Institutions can be especially resistant to change, and educational institutions more than most. Change, with all its possibilities and obstacles to fruition, was on my mind as I reviewed the articles in the present issue of the Journal of Jewish Education. Let us begin with the articles in this issue that round out our special focus on “Jewish Education in the Time of COVID-19,” which began in our previous issue. Larry Cuban and David Tyack's 1995 book, Tinkering Toward Utopia, about the intractability of the “grammar of schooling,” the ways in which public schools have largely been impervious to a century of reform initiatives, seemed particularly relevant while reading Isa Aron and Ziva Hassenfeld's article, “Going Beyond Zoom to Enrich Learning in a Part-time Jewish School.” The authors explore how part-time congregational school teachers utilized technology as a pedagogical tool in the midst of the pandemic, particularly during the first few waves, when most schools were forced to migrate to online education. In particular, Aron and Hassenfeld offer a case study of two exemplary practitioners, describing specific lessons where these educators went beyond the functionalities provided by Zoom and utilized apps and Web 2.0 technologies in ways that allowed them to make online Jewish education more participatory and learner-centered. The authors also ask why these teachers were able to use technology so adeptly, even while the vast majority of their colleagues settled into a routine of frontal teaching on Zoom with the occasional use of breakout rooms and the polling function. Here is where Cuban and Tyack's work becomes relevant. Even with professional development and other support from a local Jewish educational agency there was very little change on the ground. Aron and Hassenfeld make a strong case for the integration of TPACK (technological pedagogical content knowledge) theory into the curricula of Jewish educator training programs. But they also acknowledge that the two teachers that they profiled were atypical in their degree of tech-savviness, penchant for creativity, and level of preparation for teaching. While the authors are optimistic that as more teachers become tech-savvy they will engage in “self-directed professional development” on the web, a century of failed school reforms in the public school and Jewish educational institutions points to a different possible outcome. Being a digital native does not necessarily endow a teacher with the mindset or skills to create impactful learning environments any more than knowing how to thread the film on JOURNAL OF JEWISH EDUCATION 2022, VOL. 88, NO. 1, 1–4 https://doi.org/10.1080/15244113.2022.2038000
犹太教育与变革的潜力
约翰·F·肯尼迪曾称变革为“生命法则”,但它的必然性并没有让变革变得更容易。机构可能特别抗拒变革,教育机构比大多数机构更抗拒变革。当我回顾本期《犹太教育杂志》上的文章时,我想到了变革,以及实现变革的所有可能性和障碍。让我们从本期文章开始,这些文章完善了我们对“新冠肺炎时期的犹太教育”的特别关注,该关注始于上一期。拉里·库班(Larry Cuban)和大卫·蒂亚克(David Tyack。“作者探讨了在疫情期间,特别是在前几波疫情期间,当大多数学校被迫转向在线教育时,兼职教会学校教师是如何利用技术作为教学工具的。特别是,Aron和Hassenfeld对两位模范从业者进行了案例研究,描述了这些教育工作者超越Zoom提供的功能,利用应用程序和Web 2.0技术,使在线犹太教育更具参与性和以学习者为中心的具体课程。作者还问,为什么这些老师能够如此熟练地使用技术,尽管他们的绝大多数同事都习惯于在Zoom上进行日常的正面教学,偶尔使用分组会议室和投票功能。库班和泰亚克的作品在这里变得相关。即使有当地犹太教育机构的专业发展和其他支持,当地也没有什么变化。Aron和Hassenfeld提出了将TPACK(技术教学内容知识)理论纳入犹太教育工作者培训计划课程的有力理由。但他们也承认,他们介绍的两位老师在技术娴熟程度、创造力和教学准备水平方面都是非典型的。尽管作者乐观地认为,随着越来越多的教师精通技术,他们将在网络上进行“自我指导的专业发展”,但一个世纪以来公立学校和犹太教育机构失败的学校改革表明了不同的可能结果。作为一名数字原生教师,并不一定能赋予教师创造有影响力的学习环境的心态或技能,就像知道如何在《犹太教育杂志》2022年第88卷第1期第1-4页上放映这部电影一样https://doi.org/10.1080/15244113.2022.2038000
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Jewish Education
Journal of Jewish Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
75.00%
发文量
15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信