Core stabilisation exercises reduce chronic low back pain in Air Force fighter pilots: a randomised controlled trial.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Priscilla Rique Furtado Mendes, S R A Gomes, L D O Costa, A D A L Liguori, L C C Bulhões, J S Brasileiro
{"title":"Core stabilisation exercises reduce chronic low back pain in Air Force fighter pilots: a randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Priscilla Rique Furtado Mendes, S R A Gomes, L D O Costa, A D A L Liguori, L C C Bulhões, J S Brasileiro","doi":"10.1136/bmjmilitary-2021-002005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is evidence that core stabilisation, strength and endurance training contribute to reduce low back pain in the general population. However, we are not aware of the effect of these exercises on fighter aviation pilots. Therefore, the present study aims to investigate the effects of an exercise protocol on chronic low back pain in Brazilian Air Force fighter pilots. Changes in neck pain, lumbar disability, range of motion, strength and resistance were also investigated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fourteen participants with chronic low back pain were randomised into two groups: stabilisation exercise group (SEG-n=7), exercise protocol twice a week for 12 weeks) and the regular exercise group (REG-n=7), which performed their own usual exercise routine. The evaluations were carried out before and after the training period. The primary outcome was the intensity of low back pain and the secondary outcomes were cervical pain, functional disability, range of motion, maximum isometric strength and trunk muscle resistance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The SEG had a significant reduction in low back pain compared with the REG (difference of 2.3 points, p=0.04) and a lower rate of cervical pain (difference of 2.5 points, p=0.01) at the end of the protocol. Maintenance of trunk muscle strength was also observed in the SEG over the period, while the REG presented a decrease in flexural strength to the right side (difference between groups: -3.7%, p=0.04). There were no differences in the rates of disability, range of motion or resistance to fatigue between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The stabilisation exercise programme focused on the core muscles was successful in decreasing the fighter pilots' chronic lumbar pain. Pilots are normally active; however, our results indicate that specific trunk training programmes should be offered considering the work needs of these subjects.</p><p><strong>Clinical trials: </strong>'Exercise protocol for pilots with back pain' (registered: 09 October 2018)-NCT03713814 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03713814).</p>","PeriodicalId":48485,"journal":{"name":"Bmj Military Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bmj Military Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjmilitary-2021-002005","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is evidence that core stabilisation, strength and endurance training contribute to reduce low back pain in the general population. However, we are not aware of the effect of these exercises on fighter aviation pilots. Therefore, the present study aims to investigate the effects of an exercise protocol on chronic low back pain in Brazilian Air Force fighter pilots. Changes in neck pain, lumbar disability, range of motion, strength and resistance were also investigated.

Methods: Fourteen participants with chronic low back pain were randomised into two groups: stabilisation exercise group (SEG-n=7), exercise protocol twice a week for 12 weeks) and the regular exercise group (REG-n=7), which performed their own usual exercise routine. The evaluations were carried out before and after the training period. The primary outcome was the intensity of low back pain and the secondary outcomes were cervical pain, functional disability, range of motion, maximum isometric strength and trunk muscle resistance.

Results: The SEG had a significant reduction in low back pain compared with the REG (difference of 2.3 points, p=0.04) and a lower rate of cervical pain (difference of 2.5 points, p=0.01) at the end of the protocol. Maintenance of trunk muscle strength was also observed in the SEG over the period, while the REG presented a decrease in flexural strength to the right side (difference between groups: -3.7%, p=0.04). There were no differences in the rates of disability, range of motion or resistance to fatigue between groups.

Conclusions: The stabilisation exercise programme focused on the core muscles was successful in decreasing the fighter pilots' chronic lumbar pain. Pilots are normally active; however, our results indicate that specific trunk training programmes should be offered considering the work needs of these subjects.

Clinical trials: 'Exercise protocol for pilots with back pain' (registered: 09 October 2018)-NCT03713814 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03713814).

核心稳定训练减轻空军战斗机飞行员慢性腰痛:一项随机对照试验
背景有证据表明,核心稳定、力量和耐力训练有助于减轻普通人群的腰痛。然而,我们不知道这些演习对战斗机飞行员的影响。因此,本研究旨在调查锻炼方案对巴西空军战斗机飞行员慢性腰痛的影响。还调查了颈部疼痛、腰椎残疾、活动范围、力量和阻力的变化。方法将14名患有慢性腰痛的参与者随机分为两组:稳定运动组(SEG-n=7),每周两次,持续12周的运动方案)和常规运动组(REG n=7)。评估是在培训期前后进行的。主要结果是腰痛的强度,次要结果是颈部疼痛、功能障碍、活动范围、最大等长力量和躯干肌肉阻力。结果与REG相比,SEG显著降低了腰痛(差异2.3分,p=0.04),并在方案结束时降低了宫颈疼痛发生率(差异2.5分,p=0.01)。在此期间,SEG的躯干肌肉力量也得到了维持,而REG的右侧弯曲力量有所下降(各组之间的差异:-3.7%,p=0.04)。各组之间的残疾率、运动范围或疲劳抵抗力没有差异。结论以核心肌肉为核心的稳定训练方案成功地减轻了战斗机飞行员的慢性腰椎疼痛。飞行员通常处于活动状态;然而,我们的研究结果表明,考虑到这些科目的工作需求,应该提供具体的主干训练计划。临床试验“飞行员背痛的锻炼方案”(注册时间:2018年10月9日)-NCT0313814(https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03713814)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bmj Military Health
Bmj Military Health MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
116
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信