Menyelisik Isu Perlindungan Konsumen pada Klausula Eksonerasi di Sektor Jasa Keuangan dan Retail dengan Pendekatan Mixed Methods

R. Syarifa, L. Rahmawati, P. Andini, M. Simanjuntak, A. Anggraini
{"title":"Menyelisik Isu Perlindungan Konsumen pada Klausula Eksonerasi di Sektor Jasa Keuangan dan Retail dengan Pendekatan Mixed Methods","authors":"R. Syarifa, L. Rahmawati, P. Andini, M. Simanjuntak, A. Anggraini","doi":"10.24156/jikk.2022.15.2.178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Throughout 2021, the National Consumer Protection Agency (BPKN) has received 2.113 complaints from the financial services sector and 427 complaints from the retail sector, where problems related to the exoneration clause are one of the most reported problems. This research aimed to analyze the influence of knowledge and attitudes on consumer behavior and explore the role of the Consumer Dispute Settlement Agency (BPSK) in supervising the inclusion of the exoneration clause. This research applied sequential mixed methods that combine quantitative and qualitative approaches. The survey was conducted on 170 respondents who were selected by voluntary sampling. The descriptive analysis showed that consumer knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors related to the exoneration clause were still low. Only knowledge had a significant effect on consumer attitudes. The result of the in-depth interview concludes that the role of BPSK has not been effective and tends to be passive in supervising the inclusion of the exoneration clause. It is because there are no clear technical instructions and implementation instructions related to the supervision of the inclusion of the exoneration clause. Therefore, an institution with authority must examine, validate, and certify standard clauses before being applied to consumers.","PeriodicalId":56221,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Ilmu Keluarga dan Konsumen","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Ilmu Keluarga dan Konsumen","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24156/jikk.2022.15.2.178","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Throughout 2021, the National Consumer Protection Agency (BPKN) has received 2.113 complaints from the financial services sector and 427 complaints from the retail sector, where problems related to the exoneration clause are one of the most reported problems. This research aimed to analyze the influence of knowledge and attitudes on consumer behavior and explore the role of the Consumer Dispute Settlement Agency (BPSK) in supervising the inclusion of the exoneration clause. This research applied sequential mixed methods that combine quantitative and qualitative approaches. The survey was conducted on 170 respondents who were selected by voluntary sampling. The descriptive analysis showed that consumer knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors related to the exoneration clause were still low. Only knowledge had a significant effect on consumer attitudes. The result of the in-depth interview concludes that the role of BPSK has not been effective and tends to be passive in supervising the inclusion of the exoneration clause. It is because there are no clear technical instructions and implementation instructions related to the supervision of the inclusion of the exoneration clause. Therefore, an institution with authority must examine, validate, and certify standard clauses before being applied to consumers.
用混合方法在经济学和零售业暴露条款中注入消费者保护内容
在整个2021年,国家消费者保护局(BPKN)收到了来自金融服务部门的2.113起投诉和来自零售部门的427起投诉,其中与免责条款相关的问题是报告最多的问题之一。本研究旨在分析知识和态度对消费者行为的影响,并探讨消费者争议解决机构(BPSK)在监督免责条款纳入方面的作用。本研究采用定量与定性相结合的顺序混合方法。该调查是对自愿抽样选出的170名受访者进行的。描述性分析表明,消费者对免责条款的知识、态度和行为仍然很低。只有知识对消费者态度有显著影响。深入访谈的结果表明,BPSK在监督免责条款纳入方面的作用并不有效,而且往往是被动的。这是因为没有明确的与免责条款纳入监管相关的技术说明和实施说明。因此,在将标准条款应用于消费者之前,有权力的机构必须对其进行审查、验证和认证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信