Principals’ Responses to Student Gun Violence Protests: Deter, Manage, or Educate for Democracy?

IF 1.3 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Alexander Kwako, J. Rogers, J. Earl, Joseph Kahne
{"title":"Principals’ Responses to Student Gun Violence Protests: Deter, Manage, or Educate for Democracy?","authors":"Alexander Kwako, J. Rogers, J. Earl, Joseph Kahne","doi":"10.1177/01614681231163629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context: School-based student protests have received little scholarly attention, yet they have the potential to impact the school community, students’ civic development, and larger social movements. Principals are key actors in responding to school-based student protests. As school leaders, principals’ actions affect the outcome of student protests and shape many students’ first experiences as activists. Purpose: This study examines U.S. public high school principals’ responses to school-based student protests in 2018, a year of heightened protest activity in response to gun violence in schools. The purpose of our study is to understand how a national sample of principals responded to student protests and to quantify general trends in their responses. Research Design: Using a mixed methods approach, we surveyed 491 principals during the summer of 2018; follow-up interviews were conducted with 38 principals. Analyses are grounded in the Deter-Manage-Educate framework, a new conceptual framework that we develop in this paper, organized around the three broad goals principals pursue when responding to student protests. Using this framework, we determined how and how many principals deterred, managed, and educated. Results: Findings show that very few principals outright deterred student protests. Nearly all principals managed by setting parameters around protests in an effort to balance students’ right to free speech with concerns for order and safety. A majority of principals also educated, using student protest as an opportunity to encourage civic development. Our findings suggest that an important distinction exists between principals who channel students toward (or away from) a particular manner of protest and principals who facilitate reflection to help students realize their own vision of civic engagement. Implications: This study has implications not only for principals, but also for district leaders and educational leadership organizations: Although many principals receive support for managing the logistical (and legal) challenges of responding to student protests, more attention needs to be directed toward helping principals leverage the educative opportunities that student protest can provide.","PeriodicalId":48274,"journal":{"name":"Teachers College Record","volume":"125 1","pages":"131 - 177"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teachers College Record","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01614681231163629","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: School-based student protests have received little scholarly attention, yet they have the potential to impact the school community, students’ civic development, and larger social movements. Principals are key actors in responding to school-based student protests. As school leaders, principals’ actions affect the outcome of student protests and shape many students’ first experiences as activists. Purpose: This study examines U.S. public high school principals’ responses to school-based student protests in 2018, a year of heightened protest activity in response to gun violence in schools. The purpose of our study is to understand how a national sample of principals responded to student protests and to quantify general trends in their responses. Research Design: Using a mixed methods approach, we surveyed 491 principals during the summer of 2018; follow-up interviews were conducted with 38 principals. Analyses are grounded in the Deter-Manage-Educate framework, a new conceptual framework that we develop in this paper, organized around the three broad goals principals pursue when responding to student protests. Using this framework, we determined how and how many principals deterred, managed, and educated. Results: Findings show that very few principals outright deterred student protests. Nearly all principals managed by setting parameters around protests in an effort to balance students’ right to free speech with concerns for order and safety. A majority of principals also educated, using student protest as an opportunity to encourage civic development. Our findings suggest that an important distinction exists between principals who channel students toward (or away from) a particular manner of protest and principals who facilitate reflection to help students realize their own vision of civic engagement. Implications: This study has implications not only for principals, but also for district leaders and educational leadership organizations: Although many principals receive support for managing the logistical (and legal) challenges of responding to student protests, more attention needs to be directed toward helping principals leverage the educative opportunities that student protest can provide.
校长对学生枪支暴力抗议的回应:阻止、管理还是教育民主?
背景:以学校为基础的学生抗议活动很少受到学术界的关注,但它们有可能影响学校社区、学生的公民发展和更大规模的社会运动。校长是应对学校学生抗议活动的关键参与者。作为学校领导,校长的行为影响着学生抗议的结果,并塑造了许多学生作为活动家的最初经历。目的:本研究调查了美国公立高中校长对2018年学校学生抗议活动的反应。2018年,针对学校枪支暴力的抗议活动有所增加。我们研究的目的是了解全国校长样本对学生抗议的反应,并量化他们反应的总体趋势。研究设计:使用混合方法,我们在2018年夏天调查了491名校长;对38名校长进行了随访访谈。分析基于“威慑-管理-教育”框架,这是我们在本文中开发的一个新的概念框架,围绕校长在应对学生抗议时追求的三个广泛目标进行组织。利用这个框架,我们确定了如何以及有多少校长受到威慑、管理和教育。结果:调查结果显示,很少有校长直接阻止学生抗议。几乎所有校长都通过围绕抗议活动设定参数来管理,以平衡学生的言论自由权与对秩序和安全的担忧。大多数校长也进行了教育,将学生抗议作为鼓励公民发展的机会。我们的研究结果表明,引导学生走向(或远离)特定抗议方式的校长和促进反思以帮助学生实现自己的公民参与愿景的校长之间存在着重要区别。启示:这项研究不仅对校长有启示,对地区领导人和教育领导组织也有启示:尽管许多校长在应对学生抗议的后勤(和法律)挑战方面得到了支持,但需要更多地关注帮助校长利用学生抗议所能提供的教育机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Teachers College Record
Teachers College Record EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
89
期刊介绍: Teachers College Record (TCR) publishes the very best scholarship in all areas of the field of education. Major articles include research, analysis, and commentary covering the full range of contemporary issues in education, education policy, and the history of education. The book section contains essay reviews of new books in a specific area as well as reviews of individual books. TCR takes a deliberately expansive view of education to keep readers informed of the study of education worldwide, both inside and outside of the classroom and across the lifespan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信