‘Regarded as children’: The Home Office Responds to the London Workers’ Film Society

IF 0.2 1区 艺术学 0 FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION
Peter Niehoff
{"title":"‘Regarded as children’: The Home Office Responds to the London Workers’ Film Society","authors":"Peter Niehoff","doi":"10.3366/jbctv.2022.0632","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"From the mid-1920s through the 1930s, workers’ film societies met across Great Britain, led by the London Workers’ Film Society (LWFS), and the authorities balked. This activity occurred alongside immense social and political change: the expansion of the right to vote in 1918 and 1928, the General Strike of 1926 and the growth of a consumer leisure culture, not to mention a global economic depression. While members of the middle-class Film Society largely managed to see what they wanted, government officials sought to treat their working-class counterparts very differently. But they found themselves constrained by the 1909 Cinematograph Act and the precedent set by the Film Society. Consequently, Special Branch and the Home Office attempted to curtail the activities of the LWFS through indirect censorship methods including surveillance, customs warrants and legal definitions of film exhibition. Drawing on recently released Home Office files from the National Archives that detail official responses to the activities of the LWFS, this article reconsiders what these activities meant at a time of competing political ideas and class upheaval. This complements scholarship that has mostly focused on the Labour film movement, as these new sources shed light on the complex navigation that government officials had to make with regard to the ever-evolving cinematic exhibition practices.","PeriodicalId":43079,"journal":{"name":"Journal of British Cinema and Television","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of British Cinema and Television","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/jbctv.2022.0632","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

From the mid-1920s through the 1930s, workers’ film societies met across Great Britain, led by the London Workers’ Film Society (LWFS), and the authorities balked. This activity occurred alongside immense social and political change: the expansion of the right to vote in 1918 and 1928, the General Strike of 1926 and the growth of a consumer leisure culture, not to mention a global economic depression. While members of the middle-class Film Society largely managed to see what they wanted, government officials sought to treat their working-class counterparts very differently. But they found themselves constrained by the 1909 Cinematograph Act and the precedent set by the Film Society. Consequently, Special Branch and the Home Office attempted to curtail the activities of the LWFS through indirect censorship methods including surveillance, customs warrants and legal definitions of film exhibition. Drawing on recently released Home Office files from the National Archives that detail official responses to the activities of the LWFS, this article reconsiders what these activities meant at a time of competing political ideas and class upheaval. This complements scholarship that has mostly focused on the Labour film movement, as these new sources shed light on the complex navigation that government officials had to make with regard to the ever-evolving cinematic exhibition practices.
“被视为儿童”:英国内政部回应伦敦工人电影协会
从20世纪20年代中期到30年代,在伦敦工人电影协会(LWFS)的领导下,工人电影协会在英国各地集会,而当局却犹豫不决。这些活动伴随着巨大的社会和政治变革而发生:1918年和1928年投票权的扩大,1926年的大罢工,消费休闲文化的发展,更不用说全球经济萧条了。虽然中产阶级电影协会的成员基本上能够看到他们想要的东西,但政府官员却试图以非常不同的方式对待他们的工人阶级同行。但他们发现自己受到了1909年《电影摄影法》和电影协会开创的先例的限制。因此,特别处和内政部试图通过间接审查方法,包括监视、海关搜查令和电影放映的法律定义,来限制LWFS的活动。根据英国国家档案馆最近公布的内政部文件,详细介绍了官方对LWFS活动的回应,本文重新思考了这些活动在政治理念竞争和阶级动荡时期的意义。这是对主要关注工党电影运动的学术研究的补充,因为这些新的来源揭示了政府官员在不断发展的电影展览实践中必须做出的复杂导航。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of British Cinema and Television
Journal of British Cinema and Television FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
53
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信