Lipid-Based Poly(I:C) Adjuvants Strongly Enhance the Immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 Receptor-Binding Domain Vaccine

Yixin Wu, Liuxian Meng, Huicong Zhang, Shun-guang Hu, Fusheng Li, Yingjie Yu
{"title":"Lipid-Based Poly(I:C) Adjuvants Strongly Enhance the Immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 Receptor-Binding Domain Vaccine","authors":"Yixin Wu, Liuxian Meng, Huicong Zhang, Shun-guang Hu, Fusheng Li, Yingjie Yu","doi":"10.1097/ID9.0000000000000074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background The outbreak of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has greatly threatened public health. Recent studies have revealed that the spike receptor-binding domain (RBD) of SARS-CoV-2 is a potent target for vaccine development. However, adjuvants are usually required to strengthen the immunogenicity of recombinant antigens. Different types of adjuvants can elicit different immune responses. Methods We developed an RBD recombinant protein vaccine with a polyriboinosinic acid–polyribocytidylic acid [poly(I:C)] adjuvant to evoke a strong immune response. The delivery of poly(I:C) was optimized in two steps. First, poly(I:C) was complexed with a cationic polymer, poly-l-lysine (PLL), to form poly(I:C)–PLL, a polyplex core. Thereafter, it was loaded into five different lipid shells (group II, III-1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine [DSPC], III-1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine [DOPE], IV-DOPE, and IV-DSPC). We performed an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot assay to compare the ability of the five lipopolyplex adjuvants to enhance the immunogenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 RBD protein, including humoral and cellular immune responses. Finally, the adjuvant with the highest immunogenicity was selected to verify the protective immunity of the vaccine through animal challenge experiments. Results Recombinant RBD protein has low immunogenicity. The different adjuvants we developed enhanced the immunogenicity of the RBD protein in different ways. Among the lipopolyplexes, those containing DOPE (III-DOPE and IV-DOPE) elicited RBD-specific immunoglobulin G antibody responses, and adjuvants with four components elicited better RBD-specific immunoglobulin G antibody responses than those containing three components (P < 0.05). The IC50 and IC90 titers indicated that the IV-DOPE lipopolyplex had the greatest neutralization ability, with IC50 titers of 1/117,490. Furthermore, in the challenge study, IV-DOPE lipopolyplex protected mice from SARS-CoV-2 infection. On the fourth day after infection, the average animal body weights were reduced by 18.56% (24.164 ± 0.665 g vs. 19.678 ± 0.455 g) and 0.06% (24.249 ± 0.683 g vs. 24.235 ± 0.681 g) in the MOCK and vaccine groups, respectively. In addition, the relative expression of viral RNA in the vaccinated group was significantly lower than that in the MOCK group (P < 0.05). Interstitial inflammatory cell infiltration was observed in the MOCK group, whereas no obvious damage was observed in the vaccinated group. Conclusions The IV-DOPE–adjuvanted SARS-CoV-2 recombinant RBD protein vaccine efficiently protected mice from SARS-CoV-2 in the animal challenge study. Therefore, IV-DOPE is considered an exceptional adjuvant for SARS-CoV-2 recombinant RBD protein-based vaccines and has the potential to be further developed into a SARS-CoV-2 recombinant RBD protein-based vaccine.","PeriodicalId":73371,"journal":{"name":"Infectious diseases & immunity","volume":"3 1","pages":"3 - 12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infectious diseases & immunity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ID9.0000000000000074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Background The outbreak of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has greatly threatened public health. Recent studies have revealed that the spike receptor-binding domain (RBD) of SARS-CoV-2 is a potent target for vaccine development. However, adjuvants are usually required to strengthen the immunogenicity of recombinant antigens. Different types of adjuvants can elicit different immune responses. Methods We developed an RBD recombinant protein vaccine with a polyriboinosinic acid–polyribocytidylic acid [poly(I:C)] adjuvant to evoke a strong immune response. The delivery of poly(I:C) was optimized in two steps. First, poly(I:C) was complexed with a cationic polymer, poly-l-lysine (PLL), to form poly(I:C)–PLL, a polyplex core. Thereafter, it was loaded into five different lipid shells (group II, III-1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine [DSPC], III-1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine [DOPE], IV-DOPE, and IV-DSPC). We performed an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot assay to compare the ability of the five lipopolyplex adjuvants to enhance the immunogenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 RBD protein, including humoral and cellular immune responses. Finally, the adjuvant with the highest immunogenicity was selected to verify the protective immunity of the vaccine through animal challenge experiments. Results Recombinant RBD protein has low immunogenicity. The different adjuvants we developed enhanced the immunogenicity of the RBD protein in different ways. Among the lipopolyplexes, those containing DOPE (III-DOPE and IV-DOPE) elicited RBD-specific immunoglobulin G antibody responses, and adjuvants with four components elicited better RBD-specific immunoglobulin G antibody responses than those containing three components (P < 0.05). The IC50 and IC90 titers indicated that the IV-DOPE lipopolyplex had the greatest neutralization ability, with IC50 titers of 1/117,490. Furthermore, in the challenge study, IV-DOPE lipopolyplex protected mice from SARS-CoV-2 infection. On the fourth day after infection, the average animal body weights were reduced by 18.56% (24.164 ± 0.665 g vs. 19.678 ± 0.455 g) and 0.06% (24.249 ± 0.683 g vs. 24.235 ± 0.681 g) in the MOCK and vaccine groups, respectively. In addition, the relative expression of viral RNA in the vaccinated group was significantly lower than that in the MOCK group (P < 0.05). Interstitial inflammatory cell infiltration was observed in the MOCK group, whereas no obvious damage was observed in the vaccinated group. Conclusions The IV-DOPE–adjuvanted SARS-CoV-2 recombinant RBD protein vaccine efficiently protected mice from SARS-CoV-2 in the animal challenge study. Therefore, IV-DOPE is considered an exceptional adjuvant for SARS-CoV-2 recombinant RBD protein-based vaccines and has the potential to be further developed into a SARS-CoV-2 recombinant RBD protein-based vaccine.
脂质基聚(I:C)佐剂增强严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型受体结合域疫苗的免疫原性
摘要背景严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型的爆发严重威胁着公众健康。最近的研究表明,严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型的刺突受体结合域(RBD)是疫苗开发的有力靶点。然而,通常需要佐剂来增强重组抗原的免疫原性。不同类型的佐剂可以引发不同的免疫反应。方法我们开发了一种含有聚核糖肌苷酸-聚核糖胞苷酸[聚(I:C)]佐剂的RBD重组蛋白疫苗,以引起强烈的免疫反应。聚(I:C)的递送分两步进行优化。首先,将poly(I:C)与阳离子聚合物聚赖氨酸(PLL)络合,形成poly(1:C)–PLL,一种多聚物核。此后,将其装载到五种不同的脂质壳中(第II组,III-1,2-二硬脂酰基-sn-甘油-3-磷酸胆碱[DPC]、III-1,2-二醇酰基-sn-葡萄糖-3-磷酸乙醇胺[DOPE]、IV-DOPE和IV-DSPC)。我们进行了酶联免疫吸附试验和酶联免疫斑点试验,以比较五种脂多糖佐剂增强严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型RBD蛋白免疫原性的能力,包括体液和细胞免疫反应。最后,选择免疫原性最高的佐剂,通过动物攻击实验验证疫苗的保护性免疫。结果重组RBD蛋白具有较低的免疫原性。我们开发的不同佐剂以不同的方式增强RBD蛋白的免疫原性。在脂溶性复合物中,含有DOPE的(III-DOPE和IV-DOPE)能引发RBD特异性免疫球蛋白G抗体反应,而含有四种成分的佐剂比含有三种成分的辅料能引发更好的RBD特异性免疫球蛋白G抗体反应(P<0.05),IC50滴度为1/117490。此外,在挑战性研究中,IV-DOPE脂多糖保护小鼠免受严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型感染。感染后第4天,MOCK组和疫苗组的平均动物体重分别减少了18.56%(24.164±0.665 g vs.19.678±0.455 g)和0.06%(24.249±0.683 g vs.24.235±0.681 g)。此外,接种组病毒RNA的相对表达显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。对照组间质炎症细胞浸润,而接种组未观察到明显损伤。结论在动物攻击研究中,IV-DOPE佐剂的严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型重组RBD蛋白疫苗有效地保护小鼠免受严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒的感染。因此,IV-DOPE被认为是基于严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型重组RBD蛋白的疫苗的一种特殊佐剂,并有可能进一步发展成为基于严重急性呼吸道综合征冠状病毒2中重组RBD蛋白质的疫苗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信