An empirical study on quality improvement in higher education institutions with reference to selected processes

Q2 Business, Management and Accounting
Rahul V. Mulay, V. Khanna
{"title":"An empirical study on quality improvement in higher education institutions with reference to selected processes","authors":"Rahul V. Mulay, V. Khanna","doi":"10.1080/10686967.2020.1848367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Quality improvement plays an important role in higher education. The purpose of this study was to find the impact of quality (in terms of customer expectations) related to selected administrative processes in professional higher education institutions. The literature revealed that quality management in higher education studies mainly focused on teaching, learning, student issues, and infrastructure. Very few studies mentioned quality in terms of the administrative processes; hence, the authors saw the need to study this aspect. The study involved administering a survey questionnaire to students, faculty, administrative staff, and process owners in private engineering and management institutions. Data were collected from 12 engineering institutions and 8 management institutions. The total sample size was 725 respondents. Data analysis was done using Partial Least Square-Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) software. In this study, the admissions process was found to have the most impact on quality, and exam and placement processes also had a significant impact on quality. The authors recommend that private higher education institutions strive to improve and maintain good quality.","PeriodicalId":38208,"journal":{"name":"Quality Management Journal","volume":"28 1","pages":"41 - 56"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10686967.2020.1848367","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10686967.2020.1848367","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Abstract Quality improvement plays an important role in higher education. The purpose of this study was to find the impact of quality (in terms of customer expectations) related to selected administrative processes in professional higher education institutions. The literature revealed that quality management in higher education studies mainly focused on teaching, learning, student issues, and infrastructure. Very few studies mentioned quality in terms of the administrative processes; hence, the authors saw the need to study this aspect. The study involved administering a survey questionnaire to students, faculty, administrative staff, and process owners in private engineering and management institutions. Data were collected from 12 engineering institutions and 8 management institutions. The total sample size was 725 respondents. Data analysis was done using Partial Least Square-Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) software. In this study, the admissions process was found to have the most impact on quality, and exam and placement processes also had a significant impact on quality. The authors recommend that private higher education institutions strive to improve and maintain good quality.
基于选择过程的高等教育质量提升实证研究
摘要质量提高在高等教育中具有重要作用。本研究的目的是发现质量的影响(就客户期望而言)与专业高等教育机构中选定的行政流程有关。文献表明,高等教育质量管理研究主要集中在教学、学习、学生问题和基础设施方面。很少有研究提到行政程序方面的质量;因此,作者认为有必要对这方面进行研究。该研究包括对私人工程和管理机构的学生、教师、行政人员和流程所有者进行问卷调查。数据来自12所工程院校和8所管理院校。总样本量为725名受访者。数据分析采用偏最小二乘结构方程建模(PLS-SEM)软件。本研究发现,招生过程对质量影响最大,考试和分班过程对质量也有显著影响。作者建议私立高等教育机构努力提高和保持良好的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Quality Management Journal
Quality Management Journal Business, Management and Accounting-Business, Management and Accounting (all)
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信