Jeonghyun Lee, JunYeong Jeong, Jaeha Lee, Jae Yong Lee, Ji Ho Choi
{"title":"Compliance After Re-Prescription for Positive Airway Pressure in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Patients Who Failed Positive Airway Pressure Therapy.","authors":"Jeonghyun Lee, JunYeong Jeong, Jaeha Lee, Jae Yong Lee, Ji Ho Choi","doi":"10.18787/jr.2022.00417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Little is known about studies evaluating positive airway pressure (PAP) compliance after re-prescription. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate PAP compliance after re-prescription in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) patients who failed initial PAP therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed OSA patients who had received a re-prescription for PAP from March 2020 to June 2021. We compared the compliance rate between initial prescription and re-prescription for PAP and investigated the reasons for PAP failure after the first prescription.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 10 consecutive OSA patients (mean age=45.6±13.7 years and male:female=8:2) who received a re-prescription for PAP were included. Of them, 8 patients (80%) met the compliance criteria (i.e., Korean National Health Insurance criteria) for PAP after re-prescription. The compliance rate increased from 36.3±18.2% (initial prescription) to 61.3±28.8% (re-prescription); this was not of statistical significance (p=0.074). PAP/mask-related discomfort was the most common reason for PAP failure, followed by nasal obstruction, unintentional mask removal, and pressure-related discomfort.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Even if initial PAP therapy fails, the proportion of patients who meet the compliance criteria may be improved through various forms of clinical aid and support after re-prescription of PAP.</p>","PeriodicalId":33935,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rhinology","volume":" ","pages":"148-154"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11524368/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rhinology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18787/jr.2022.00417","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/11/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and objectives: Little is known about studies evaluating positive airway pressure (PAP) compliance after re-prescription. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate PAP compliance after re-prescription in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) patients who failed initial PAP therapy.
Methods: We retrospectively reviewed OSA patients who had received a re-prescription for PAP from March 2020 to June 2021. We compared the compliance rate between initial prescription and re-prescription for PAP and investigated the reasons for PAP failure after the first prescription.
Results: A total of 10 consecutive OSA patients (mean age=45.6±13.7 years and male:female=8:2) who received a re-prescription for PAP were included. Of them, 8 patients (80%) met the compliance criteria (i.e., Korean National Health Insurance criteria) for PAP after re-prescription. The compliance rate increased from 36.3±18.2% (initial prescription) to 61.3±28.8% (re-prescription); this was not of statistical significance (p=0.074). PAP/mask-related discomfort was the most common reason for PAP failure, followed by nasal obstruction, unintentional mask removal, and pressure-related discomfort.
Conclusion: Even if initial PAP therapy fails, the proportion of patients who meet the compliance criteria may be improved through various forms of clinical aid and support after re-prescription of PAP.