Banking service quality literature: a bibliometric review and future research agenda

IF 1.9 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Ritesh Patel, Aaliyah Siddiqui
{"title":"Banking service quality literature: a bibliometric review and future research agenda","authors":"Ritesh Patel, Aaliyah Siddiqui","doi":"10.1108/qrfm-01-2022-0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this paper is to perform a meta-bibliometric analysis of the banking service quality and to provide various research streams. Another goal is to provide future research questions to explore these areas in more detail.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe authors used three major academic databases (Scopus, ProQuest and EBSCO) from 1980–2021 and found 226 papers, where they performed the meta-bibliometric analysis by performing co-citation analysis, co-authorship analysis, cartographic analysis and content analysis.\n\n\nFindings\nThe SERVQUAL model is the most used conceptual framework and model to study banking service quality. Structural equation modeling (SEM), followed by partial least squares SEM, is a majorly used method. There are three research streams in the literature: retail banking service quality, internet banking service quality and mobile banking service quality. Retail banking is the most studied stream, whereas mobile banking is the least studied stream. The study on banking service quality was initially conducted in developed markets, and later in emerging markets. All three streams have scope for further exploration, and hence, 44 future research questions have also been proposed.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThis study has implications for bank managers, academicians and future researchers.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis study is unique in that it examines the meta-bibliometric dimensions of banking service quality and provides directions for future research for academicians and researchers.\n","PeriodicalId":45060,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Research in financial Markets","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qualitative Research in financial Markets","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/qrfm-01-2022-0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to perform a meta-bibliometric analysis of the banking service quality and to provide various research streams. Another goal is to provide future research questions to explore these areas in more detail. Design/methodology/approach The authors used three major academic databases (Scopus, ProQuest and EBSCO) from 1980–2021 and found 226 papers, where they performed the meta-bibliometric analysis by performing co-citation analysis, co-authorship analysis, cartographic analysis and content analysis. Findings The SERVQUAL model is the most used conceptual framework and model to study banking service quality. Structural equation modeling (SEM), followed by partial least squares SEM, is a majorly used method. There are three research streams in the literature: retail banking service quality, internet banking service quality and mobile banking service quality. Retail banking is the most studied stream, whereas mobile banking is the least studied stream. The study on banking service quality was initially conducted in developed markets, and later in emerging markets. All three streams have scope for further exploration, and hence, 44 future research questions have also been proposed. Research limitations/implications This study has implications for bank managers, academicians and future researchers. Originality/value This study is unique in that it examines the meta-bibliometric dimensions of banking service quality and provides directions for future research for academicians and researchers.
银行服务质量文献:文献计量回顾与未来研究议程
本文的目的是对银行服务质量进行元文献计量分析,并提供各种研究流。另一个目标是提供未来的研究问题,以更详细地探索这些领域。设计/方法/方法作者使用了1980-2021年的三大学术数据库Scopus、ProQuest和EBSCO,共收录了226篇论文,通过共被引分析、合著分析、制图分析和内容分析进行了元文献计量学分析。结果SERVQUAL模型是研究银行服务质量最常用的概念框架和模型。结构方程建模(SEM)是目前最常用的建模方法,其次是偏最小二乘法(SEM)。文献中有三个研究流:零售银行服务质量、互联网银行服务质量和手机银行服务质量。零售银行是研究最多的领域,而移动银行是研究最少的领域。对银行服务质量的研究最初是在发达市场进行的,后来在新兴市场进行。所有三个流都有进一步探索的空间,因此,也提出了44个未来的研究问题。研究局限/启示本研究对银行管理者、学者和未来的研究者都有启示意义。原创性/价值本研究的独特之处在于考察了银行服务质量的元文献计量维度,为学者和研究者提供了未来的研究方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
10.50%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Qualitative Research in Financial Markets is the only peer-reviewed journal dedicated to exploring the rapidly-growing area of research activity in finance that uses qualitative methods. Building on a long pedigree of finance research, the journal publishes international and innovative analyses and novel insights into financial markets worldwide
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信