FlexBeamOpt: Hybrid solution methodologies for high-throughput GEO satellite beam laydown and resource allocation

IF 0.9 4区 计算机科学 Q3 ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE
Angus Gaudry, Ryan Li, Vicky Mak-Hau
{"title":"FlexBeamOpt: Hybrid solution methodologies for high-throughput GEO satellite beam laydown and resource allocation","authors":"Angus Gaudry,&nbsp;Ryan Li,&nbsp;Vicky Mak-Hau","doi":"10.1002/sat.1481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Modern satellite communication systems are required to serve heterogeneous and geographically dispersed user demands with limited resources. In this paper, we investigate methodologies for dynamic resource allocation in Geosynchronous Earth Orbit (GEO) High-throughput Satellite (HTS) systems. We designed three solution approaches <span>FlexBeamOpt v1</span>, <span>FlexBeamOpt v2</span>, and <span>FlexBeamOpt v3</span>, each as a hybridization of custom heuristics, integer linear programming, and/or constraint programming. We test the performance of the three approaches on 12 test instances that vary in user distribution (realistic, random, and clustered), user numbers (500 vs. 5000 users), and demand distribution (uniform vs. random). We observed that <span>FlexBeamOpt v1</span>  consistently outperformed <span>FlexBeamOpt v2</span>  and <span>FlexBeamOpt v3</span>  in terms of demand coverage and number of users covered for realistic and random user distribution test instances but at the cost of computation time. <span>FlexBeamOpt v3</span>  is the fastest in these instances. For clustered user distribution instances, <span>FlexBeamOpt v3</span>  performed better in terms of demand coverage and number of users covered, at the cost of using more beams. For these test instances, <span>FlexBeamOpt v2</span>  is the fastest in terms of computation time while providing a comparable solution quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":50289,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Satellite Communications and Networking","volume":"41 6","pages":"515-538"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/sat.1481","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Satellite Communications and Networking","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/sat.1481","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Modern satellite communication systems are required to serve heterogeneous and geographically dispersed user demands with limited resources. In this paper, we investigate methodologies for dynamic resource allocation in Geosynchronous Earth Orbit (GEO) High-throughput Satellite (HTS) systems. We designed three solution approaches FlexBeamOpt v1, FlexBeamOpt v2, and FlexBeamOpt v3, each as a hybridization of custom heuristics, integer linear programming, and/or constraint programming. We test the performance of the three approaches on 12 test instances that vary in user distribution (realistic, random, and clustered), user numbers (500 vs. 5000 users), and demand distribution (uniform vs. random). We observed that FlexBeamOpt v1  consistently outperformed FlexBeamOpt v2  and FlexBeamOpt v3  in terms of demand coverage and number of users covered for realistic and random user distribution test instances but at the cost of computation time. FlexBeamOpt v3  is the fastest in these instances. For clustered user distribution instances, FlexBeamOpt v3  performed better in terms of demand coverage and number of users covered, at the cost of using more beams. For these test instances, FlexBeamOpt v2  is the fastest in terms of computation time while providing a comparable solution quality.

Abstract Image

FlexBeamOpt:用于高吞吐量GEO卫星波束铺设和资源分配的混合解决方案方法
现代卫星通信系统需要以有限的资源来满足异构和地理上分散的用户需求。在本文中,我们研究了地球同步轨道(GEO)高通量卫星(HTS)系统中的动态资源分配方法。我们设计了三种解决方案方法FlexBeamOpt v1、FlexBeamOpt v2和FlexBeanOpt v3,每种方法都是自定义启发式、整数线性规划和/或约束规划的混合。我们在12个测试实例上测试了这三种方法的性能,这些测试实例的用户分布(真实、随机和集群)、用户数量(500与5000用户)和需求分布(统一与随机)各不相同。我们观察到,在现实和随机用户分布测试实例的需求覆盖率和覆盖用户数量方面,FlexBeamOpt v1始终优于FlexBeamOpt v2和FlexBeamOps v3,但这是以计算时间为代价的。FlexBeanOpt v3是这些实例中速度最快的。对于集群用户分布实例,FlexBeanOpt v3在需求覆盖率和覆盖的用户数量方面表现更好,但代价是使用更多的波束。对于这些测试实例,FlexBeanOpt v2在计算时间方面是最快的,同时提供了相当的解决方案质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
31
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal covers all aspects of the theory, practice and operation of satellite systems and networks. Papers must address some aspect of satellite systems or their applications. Topics covered include: -Satellite communication and broadcast systems- Satellite navigation and positioning systems- Satellite networks and networking- Hybrid systems- Equipment-earth stations/terminals, payloads, launchers and components- Description of new systems, operations and trials- Planning and operations- Performance analysis- Interoperability- Propagation and interference- Enabling technologies-coding/modulation/signal processing, etc.- Mobile/Broadcast/Navigation/fixed services- Service provision, marketing, economics and business aspects- Standards and regulation- Network protocols
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信