When “Nice” Isn’t: Confronting Niceness and Whiteness to Center Equity in Teacher Education

Q2 Social Sciences
W. Gardiner, Tierney B. Hinman, Amy Tondreau, Sophie Degener, Tess M. Dussling, E. Stevens, Nance S. Wilson, K. White
{"title":"When “Nice” Isn’t: Confronting Niceness and Whiteness to Center Equity in Teacher Education","authors":"W. Gardiner, Tierney B. Hinman, Amy Tondreau, Sophie Degener, Tess M. Dussling, E. Stevens, Nance S. Wilson, K. White","doi":"10.1080/01626620.2022.2158390","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Niceness is a socialized disposition, particularly amongst white women, that prioritizes comfort and neutrality while preventing resistance against oppressive systems. Given the demographics of teachers and teacher educators, niceness and whiteness are deeply embedded in programs and institutions. As eight white, female teacher educators, we drew on the power of cross-institutional collaboration to form a self-study community of practice with the purpose of interrogating and dismantling the ways niceness and whiteness function in our teaching and teacher institutions and create barriers to centering equity and justice. Findings indicated that collaboration helped us identify how niceness shaped and continues to shape our teaching and teacher identities, particularly how we navigate difficult conversations, think about our roles as teacher educators, and imagine literacy curricula. Findings also indicated that despite efforts to recognize and interrupt niceness and whiteness, our growth was nonlinear, and we find that constant vigilance and reflection is necessary. Implications for the broader field of education include the power of self-study for disrupting niceness and whiteness in teacher education and orienting the community toward action through mutual support and accountability, while also recognizing the ways in which niceness continues to function as a barrier for enacting change for social justice.","PeriodicalId":52183,"journal":{"name":"Action in Teacher Education","volume":"45 1","pages":"90 - 106"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Action in Teacher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2022.2158390","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Niceness is a socialized disposition, particularly amongst white women, that prioritizes comfort and neutrality while preventing resistance against oppressive systems. Given the demographics of teachers and teacher educators, niceness and whiteness are deeply embedded in programs and institutions. As eight white, female teacher educators, we drew on the power of cross-institutional collaboration to form a self-study community of practice with the purpose of interrogating and dismantling the ways niceness and whiteness function in our teaching and teacher institutions and create barriers to centering equity and justice. Findings indicated that collaboration helped us identify how niceness shaped and continues to shape our teaching and teacher identities, particularly how we navigate difficult conversations, think about our roles as teacher educators, and imagine literacy curricula. Findings also indicated that despite efforts to recognize and interrupt niceness and whiteness, our growth was nonlinear, and we find that constant vigilance and reflection is necessary. Implications for the broader field of education include the power of self-study for disrupting niceness and whiteness in teacher education and orienting the community toward action through mutual support and accountability, while also recognizing the ways in which niceness continues to function as a barrier for enacting change for social justice.
当“好”不在时:直面“好”与“白”以公平为中心的教师教育
摘要利基是一种社会化倾向,尤其是在白人女性中,它优先考虑舒适和中立,同时防止对压迫制度的抵抗。考虑到教师和教师教育工作者的人口统计,友善和白人深深植根于项目和机构中。作为八名白人女性教师教育工作者,我们利用跨机构合作的力量,形成了一个自学实践社区,目的是质疑和废除我们的教学和教师机构中的美好和白人的运作方式,并为以公平和正义为中心制造障碍。研究结果表明,合作帮助我们确定了友善是如何塑造并继续塑造我们的教学和教师身份的,特别是我们如何驾驭艰难的对话,思考我们作为教师教育者的角色,以及想象识字课程。研究结果还表明,尽管我们努力识别和打断美好和白色,但我们的成长是非线性的,我们发现持续的警惕和反思是必要的。对更广泛的教育领域的影响包括自学的力量,它破坏了教师教育中的精细化和白人化,并通过相互支持和问责引导社区采取行动,同时也认识到精细化继续成为实现社会正义变革的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Action in Teacher Education
Action in Teacher Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信