Normative values of hand grip strength of older Filipinos aged 60 to 85 years

Sanny Boy Afable , Grace Cruz , Yasuhiko Saito , Rahul Malhotra
{"title":"Normative values of hand grip strength of older Filipinos aged 60 to 85 years","authors":"Sanny Boy Afable ,&nbsp;Grace Cruz ,&nbsp;Yasuhiko Saito ,&nbsp;Rahul Malhotra","doi":"10.1016/j.ahr.2022.100108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Hand grip strength (HGS) is associated with a range of health outcomes in older persons. Interpretation of an individual older person's HGS requires comparison with normative values of HGS for the population the older person belongs to, but normative values of HGS for older Filipinos are not established.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Using data on a subset (<em>n</em> = 3406) of ‘healthy’ persons aged 60 to 85 years from the baseline survey of the nationally representative Longitudinal Study of Ageing and Health in the Philippines (LSAHP), we established normative values of HGS and determined the association of older person characteristics with the normative values. We also compared the health status of mutually exclusive groups, defined using the normative values among all LSAHP participants aged 60 to 85 years with measured HGS, to assess the efficiency of the normative values. HGS was measured using a Smedley spring-type dynamometer, in a standing position with elbows extended, thrice for each hand.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Single-year age, gender-, and hand-specific values and graphs for the normative values (5th, 20th, 50th, 80th, and 95th percentiles) of HGS were delineated. Height, weight, education, and occupation of the older person were associated with the normative values. Individuals classified into groups representing weaker HGS had a poorer health status.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The established normative values provide a reference for interpreting HGS values, measured using Smedley spring-type dynamometers, in older Filipinos aged 60 to 85 years.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72129,"journal":{"name":"Aging and health research","volume":"2 4","pages":"Article 100108"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667032122000543/pdfft?md5=aa56e8994ec51cd039ddd53a48a79e50&pid=1-s2.0-S2667032122000543-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aging and health research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667032122000543","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Hand grip strength (HGS) is associated with a range of health outcomes in older persons. Interpretation of an individual older person's HGS requires comparison with normative values of HGS for the population the older person belongs to, but normative values of HGS for older Filipinos are not established.

Methods

Using data on a subset (n = 3406) of ‘healthy’ persons aged 60 to 85 years from the baseline survey of the nationally representative Longitudinal Study of Ageing and Health in the Philippines (LSAHP), we established normative values of HGS and determined the association of older person characteristics with the normative values. We also compared the health status of mutually exclusive groups, defined using the normative values among all LSAHP participants aged 60 to 85 years with measured HGS, to assess the efficiency of the normative values. HGS was measured using a Smedley spring-type dynamometer, in a standing position with elbows extended, thrice for each hand.

Results

Single-year age, gender-, and hand-specific values and graphs for the normative values (5th, 20th, 50th, 80th, and 95th percentiles) of HGS were delineated. Height, weight, education, and occupation of the older person were associated with the normative values. Individuals classified into groups representing weaker HGS had a poorer health status.

Conclusion

The established normative values provide a reference for interpreting HGS values, measured using Smedley spring-type dynamometers, in older Filipinos aged 60 to 85 years.

60 ~ 85岁菲律宾老年人握力的正常值
背景握力(HGS)与老年人的一系列健康结果相关。解释老年人个体的HGS需要与老年人所属人口的HGS规范值进行比较,但菲律宾老年人的HGS规范值尚未确定。方法利用菲律宾全国代表性老龄化与健康纵向研究(LSAHP)基线调查中60至85岁“健康”人群的数据(n = 3406),我们建立了HGS的规范值,并确定了老年人特征与规范值的关系。我们还比较了互斥组的健康状况,使用所有60至85岁LSAHP参与者的标准值与测量的HGS来定义,以评估标准值的有效性。HGS测量使用史沫特莱弹簧式测力计,在站立位置,肘部伸展,每只手三次。结果绘制了HGS标准值(第5、第20、第50、第80和第95百分位)的年龄、性别和手特异性值和图表。老年人的身高、体重、受教育程度和职业与规范值相关。被划分为代表较弱HGS组的个人健康状况较差。结论所建立的正常值可为解释60 ~ 85岁菲律宾老年人Smedley弹簧测功仪测得的HGS值提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Aging and health research
Aging and health research Clinical Neurology, Public Health and Health Policy, Geriatrics and Gerontology
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信