Treading between joy and grief: Gaudium et Spes, Louis-Joseph Lebret, and the challenge of modernity

Q2 Arts and Humanities
M. Regan
{"title":"Treading between joy and grief: Gaudium et Spes, Louis-Joseph Lebret, and the challenge of modernity","authors":"M. Regan","doi":"10.1080/17449626.2021.1958903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The concept of modernity is fraught with contestation, a wedge that divides people, practices, institutions, and beliefs. This chasm is particularly pronounced for traditional institutions like the Catholic Church that must contend with one of two dissatisfying options: wholesale acceptance of modernism, which can lead to charges of revisionism and infidelity to tradition, or stalwart rejection of modernism, which can lead to accusations of rigidity and irrelevance. There is, however, a third possibility, a hybrid approach that respects and values the teachings of tradition while taking seriously the special problems and insights of the modern condition. This approach is taken by The Pastoral Constitution of the Church in the Modern World (also known as Gaudium et Spes), the final document of the Second Vatical Council (1962–1965). This realization, however, did not emerge from detached reflection or theological debate, but rather, through the work of pioneer Catholic social thinkers and activists like the French Dominican Louis-Joseph Lebret (1897–1966). This article examples how Lebret's analysis of modernity and its problems evolved during his life and work, and how these insights ultimately helped shape the moral anthropology that enlivens the approach of Gaudium et Spes.","PeriodicalId":35191,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Ethics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17449626.2021.1958903","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT The concept of modernity is fraught with contestation, a wedge that divides people, practices, institutions, and beliefs. This chasm is particularly pronounced for traditional institutions like the Catholic Church that must contend with one of two dissatisfying options: wholesale acceptance of modernism, which can lead to charges of revisionism and infidelity to tradition, or stalwart rejection of modernism, which can lead to accusations of rigidity and irrelevance. There is, however, a third possibility, a hybrid approach that respects and values the teachings of tradition while taking seriously the special problems and insights of the modern condition. This approach is taken by The Pastoral Constitution of the Church in the Modern World (also known as Gaudium et Spes), the final document of the Second Vatical Council (1962–1965). This realization, however, did not emerge from detached reflection or theological debate, but rather, through the work of pioneer Catholic social thinkers and activists like the French Dominican Louis-Joseph Lebret (1897–1966). This article examples how Lebret's analysis of modernity and its problems evolved during his life and work, and how these insights ultimately helped shape the moral anthropology that enlivens the approach of Gaudium et Spes.
在喜悦与悲伤之间徘徊:高迪姆·斯佩斯、路易斯·约瑟夫·勒布雷特与现代性的挑战
现代性的概念充满了争议,它是分裂人、实践、制度和信仰的楔子。对于像天主教会这样的传统机构来说,这种鸿沟尤其明显,它们必须面对两种令人不满的选择之一:全盘接受现代主义,这可能导致修正主义和对传统的不忠,或者坚决拒绝现代主义,这可能导致僵化和无关紧要的指责。然而,还有第三种可能性,一种尊重和重视传统教义的混合方法,同时认真对待现代条件下的特殊问题和见解。第二次大公会议(1962-1965)的最后文件《现代世界教会牧灵章程》(也被称为《喜乐与信仰》)采用了这种方法。然而,这种认识并不是来自超然的反思或神学辩论,而是通过天主教社会思想家和活动家的先驱的工作,比如法国多米尼加人路易斯-约瑟夫·勒布雷特(Louis-Joseph Lebret, 1897-1966)。本文举例说明了Lebret对现代性及其问题的分析在他的生活和工作中是如何演变的,以及这些见解最终如何帮助塑造了道德人类学,从而使《快乐与物种》的方法活跃起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Global Ethics
Journal of Global Ethics Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信