Access to justice regarding plans and programmes related to the environment – Polish law in the light of Article 9.3 of the Aarhus Convention

M. Bar
{"title":"Access to justice regarding plans and programmes related to the environment – Polish law in the light of Article 9.3 of the Aarhus Convention","authors":"M. Bar","doi":"10.25167/osap.5005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Article 9.3 of the Aarhus Convention grants members of the public (meeting certain requirements, if a Party to the Convention so specifies) access to a review procedure (access to justice) to challenge acts or omissions by private persons or public authorities that contravene provisions of its national law relating to the environment. According to Article 2.4 of the Convention, non-governmental organisations should also be considered as \"members of the public\". \nAccording to the jurisprudence of the Aarhus Convention Compliance Committee, the activities of public authorities covered by the requirements of Article 9.3 of the Convention include adoption of plans and programmes which may have an impact on the environment. \nIn accordance with the Polish law (often following the requirements of EU law), administrative authorities adopt a whole range of plans and programmes relating to the environment or having an impact on the environment. These documents are developed either by regional or local authorities (self-governmental authorities or regional government administration) or at the central level. \nPolish law provides very limited opportunities to challenge plans or programmes. With respect to documents created at the central level, there are no such possibilities at all, and with respect to documents created at lower levels, certain, limited, rights in this respect are granted only to private entities whose legal interest has been violated. The possibility for NGOs to challenge plans or programmes is completely excluded. \nSuch a situation should be considered non-compliant with the Aarhus Convention.","PeriodicalId":34464,"journal":{"name":"Opolskie Studia AdministracyjnoPrawne","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Opolskie Studia AdministracyjnoPrawne","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25167/osap.5005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Article 9.3 of the Aarhus Convention grants members of the public (meeting certain requirements, if a Party to the Convention so specifies) access to a review procedure (access to justice) to challenge acts or omissions by private persons or public authorities that contravene provisions of its national law relating to the environment. According to Article 2.4 of the Convention, non-governmental organisations should also be considered as "members of the public". According to the jurisprudence of the Aarhus Convention Compliance Committee, the activities of public authorities covered by the requirements of Article 9.3 of the Convention include adoption of plans and programmes which may have an impact on the environment. In accordance with the Polish law (often following the requirements of EU law), administrative authorities adopt a whole range of plans and programmes relating to the environment or having an impact on the environment. These documents are developed either by regional or local authorities (self-governmental authorities or regional government administration) or at the central level. Polish law provides very limited opportunities to challenge plans or programmes. With respect to documents created at the central level, there are no such possibilities at all, and with respect to documents created at lower levels, certain, limited, rights in this respect are granted only to private entities whose legal interest has been violated. The possibility for NGOs to challenge plans or programmes is completely excluded. Such a situation should be considered non-compliant with the Aarhus Convention.
就与环境有关的计划和方案诉诸司法-根据《奥胡斯公约》第9.3条的波兰法律
《奥胡斯公约》第9.3条规定,公众(符合某些要求,如果《公约》缔约方有具体规定)可以利用审查程序(诉诸司法)对私人或公共当局违反其与环境有关的国家法律规定的行为或不作为提出质疑。根据《公约》第2.4条,非政府组织也应被视为“公众成员”。根据《奥胡斯公约》遵守委员会的判例,《公约》第9.3条的要求所涵盖的公共当局的活动包括通过可能对环境产生影响的计划和方案。根据波兰法律(通常遵循欧盟法律的要求),行政当局采用一系列与环境有关或对环境有影响的计划和方案。这些文件由地区或地方当局(自治当局或地区政府行政当局)或中央一级制定。波兰法律提供的挑战计划或方案的机会非常有限。对于在中央一级创建的文件,根本不存在这种可能性,对于在较低一级创建的文件,这方面的某些有限权利只授予其法律利益受到侵犯的私人实体。完全排除了非政府组织挑战计划或方案的可能性。这种情况应被视为不符合《奥胡斯公约》。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信