The Quality of Distance Studies: Second-Cycle Students’ Position

IF 0.7 Q3 COMMUNICATION
Vincentas Lamanauskas, Rita Makarskaitė-Petkevičienė
{"title":"The Quality of Distance Studies: Second-Cycle Students’ Position","authors":"Vincentas Lamanauskas, Rita Makarskaitė-Petkevičienė","doi":"10.30935/ojcmt/12469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the education system is still not fully known, however there are many studies examining the impact of the introduced quarantine restrictions on the circumstances and quality of students’ studies. Universities faced enormous and multifaceted challenges to organise studies during the pandemic period. During the pandemic, new distance teaching/learning platforms were introduced, and more opportunities for distance communication appeared. There is no doubt that COVID-19 has become one of the accelerators of change in the field of information technology accessibility. However, in such conditions, the issues of the quality of university studies become even more relevant. An empirical qualitative study was conducted, the purpose of which was to analyse the position of second-cycle university students on the issue of study quality. 64 master’s students in the field of social sciences from four Lithuanian universities participated in the study conducted in November-December 2021. The verbal data collected were analysed using quantitative content analysis. It was established that the second-cycle university study students evaluate basically positively the quality of online learning. The effective realisation of the study process improves the quality of these studies, while the essential worsening factors are psychophysiological and technical disturbances. The pandemic caused also certain transformations in university studies, created the conditions for a wider application of distance studies, and revealed more opportunities to use electronic resources for teaching and study purposes. Although distance master’s studies have become a novelty and a challenge to a certain extent, this has also highlighted the need for new teaching/learning methods and forms. In addition, successful and smooth continuity of the study process is only possible if there is sufficient flexibility of the participants in the university study process. © 2022 by authors;licensee OJCMT by Bastas, CY.","PeriodicalId":42941,"journal":{"name":"Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/12469","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the education system is still not fully known, however there are many studies examining the impact of the introduced quarantine restrictions on the circumstances and quality of students’ studies. Universities faced enormous and multifaceted challenges to organise studies during the pandemic period. During the pandemic, new distance teaching/learning platforms were introduced, and more opportunities for distance communication appeared. There is no doubt that COVID-19 has become one of the accelerators of change in the field of information technology accessibility. However, in such conditions, the issues of the quality of university studies become even more relevant. An empirical qualitative study was conducted, the purpose of which was to analyse the position of second-cycle university students on the issue of study quality. 64 master’s students in the field of social sciences from four Lithuanian universities participated in the study conducted in November-December 2021. The verbal data collected were analysed using quantitative content analysis. It was established that the second-cycle university study students evaluate basically positively the quality of online learning. The effective realisation of the study process improves the quality of these studies, while the essential worsening factors are psychophysiological and technical disturbances. The pandemic caused also certain transformations in university studies, created the conditions for a wider application of distance studies, and revealed more opportunities to use electronic resources for teaching and study purposes. Although distance master’s studies have become a novelty and a challenge to a certain extent, this has also highlighted the need for new teaching/learning methods and forms. In addition, successful and smooth continuity of the study process is only possible if there is sufficient flexibility of the participants in the university study process. © 2022 by authors;licensee OJCMT by Bastas, CY.
远程教育的质量:第二阶段学生的定位
COVID-19大流行对教育系统的影响尚不完全清楚,但有许多研究调查了引入的隔离限制对学生学习环境和质量的影响。大学在大流行期间面临着组织研究的巨大和多方面的挑战。疫情期间,新型远程教学平台推出,远程交流机会增多。毫无疑问,新冠肺炎疫情已成为信息技术可及性领域变革的加速器之一。然而,在这种情况下,大学学习质量的问题变得更加相关。本文进行了一项实证定性研究,目的是分析二周期大学生在学习质量问题上的立场。来自立陶宛四所大学社会科学领域的64名硕士生参加了于2021年11月至12月进行的研究。采用定量内容分析法对所收集的口头资料进行分析。结果表明,二周期大学生对网络学习质量的评价基本是肯定的。研究过程的有效实现提高了这些研究的质量,而主要的恶化因素是心理生理和技术干扰。这场大流行病还使大学研究发生了某些变化,为更广泛地应用远程学习创造了条件,并为教学和学习目的提供了更多使用电子资源的机会。虽然远程硕士学习在一定程度上已经成为一种新鲜事物和挑战,但这也凸显了对新的教学方法和形式的需求。此外,只有参与者在大学学习过程中有足够的灵活性,学习过程才有可能成功和顺利的连续性。©2022由作者所有;被许可方OJCMT由Bastas, CY。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
40
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信