Qualified Immunity of Public Officials

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q1 LAW
Karina R. Espana, Karl E. Mobbs
{"title":"Qualified Immunity of Public Officials","authors":"Karina R. Espana, Karl E. Mobbs","doi":"10.29158/JAAPL.230065L1-23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"forensic evaluators to be aware of how such factors may influence the court. A final interesting question raised by this case is who will fund the in-depth mental health evaluations considered essential in death penalty cases. The original $2,000 allotted to Mr. Jones’s trial attorney would presumably have only covered a small fraction of a forensic psychiatrist’s 130hours of billing time. It would seem unfair if the ability of a capital defendant to receive a just sentence were predicated in part on having sufficient money to hire forensic evaluators to do extensive work, but this scenario is a possible implication of the ruling in this case.","PeriodicalId":47554,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law","volume":"51 1","pages":"438 - 440"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29158/JAAPL.230065L1-23","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

forensic evaluators to be aware of how such factors may influence the court. A final interesting question raised by this case is who will fund the in-depth mental health evaluations considered essential in death penalty cases. The original $2,000 allotted to Mr. Jones’s trial attorney would presumably have only covered a small fraction of a forensic psychiatrist’s 130hours of billing time. It would seem unfair if the ability of a capital defendant to receive a just sentence were predicated in part on having sufficient money to hire forensic evaluators to do extensive work, but this scenario is a possible implication of the ruling in this case.
公职人员的有条件豁免
法医评估人员应了解这些因素对法庭的影响。本案提出的最后一个有趣的问题是,谁将为死刑案件中被认为至关重要的深入心理健康评估提供资金。最初分配给琼斯的审判律师的2000美元可能只够法医精神病学家130小时账单时间的一小部分。如果死刑被告获得公正判决的能力在一定程度上取决于是否有足够的资金聘请法医评估人员进行广泛的工作,这似乎是不公平的,但这种情况可能是本案裁决的含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
29.60%
发文量
92
期刊介绍: The American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law (AAPL, pronounced "apple") is an organization of psychiatrists dedicated to excellence in practice, teaching, and research in forensic psychiatry. Founded in 1969, AAPL currently has more than 1,500 members in North America and around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信