Effect of etomidate and propofol on airway mechanics during induction - A prospective randomized trial.

IF 1.5 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Kavitha Jayaram, Indira Gurajala, Annekiran Kumar, Padmaja Durga, Ketireddy Tejasri
{"title":"Effect of etomidate and propofol on airway mechanics during induction - A prospective randomized trial.","authors":"Kavitha Jayaram, Indira Gurajala, Annekiran Kumar, Padmaja Durga, Ketireddy Tejasri","doi":"10.4103/joacp.joacp_534_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Intravenous induction agents like propofol and etomidate change the airway mechanics and thus influence mask ventilation. These changes have an impact on the administration of muscle relaxant in a difficult mask ventilation scenario. The difference in dynamics of airway after administration of two different intravenous agents has been assessed in this study.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>After formal registry in clinical trials, patients undergoing general anesthesia were recruited and randomized into group P and E. Patients were induced with either of the intravenous agents, and mask ventilation was performed with a ventilator. After 60 s, rocuronium was administered and ventilation continued. Measurements of tidal volume, peak airway pressure, and compliance were taken from the anesthesia ventilator at different time points - induction, relaxant, and intubation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups with respect to demographics, airway parameters, and airway mechanics, as measured by tidal volume, peak airway pressure, and lung compliance. There was an improvement in the tidal volume and compliance following induction with propofol, with a <i>P</i> value of 0.007 and 0.032, respectively, obtained in within-group comparison.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Propofol and etomidate were comparable in airway mechanics, but compliance and tidal volumes improved with propofol, which facilitated face mask ventilation.</p>","PeriodicalId":14946,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology","volume":"39 1","pages":"482-487"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10661644/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/joacp.joacp_534_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/12/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Intravenous induction agents like propofol and etomidate change the airway mechanics and thus influence mask ventilation. These changes have an impact on the administration of muscle relaxant in a difficult mask ventilation scenario. The difference in dynamics of airway after administration of two different intravenous agents has been assessed in this study.

Material and methods: After formal registry in clinical trials, patients undergoing general anesthesia were recruited and randomized into group P and E. Patients were induced with either of the intravenous agents, and mask ventilation was performed with a ventilator. After 60 s, rocuronium was administered and ventilation continued. Measurements of tidal volume, peak airway pressure, and compliance were taken from the anesthesia ventilator at different time points - induction, relaxant, and intubation.

Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups with respect to demographics, airway parameters, and airway mechanics, as measured by tidal volume, peak airway pressure, and lung compliance. There was an improvement in the tidal volume and compliance following induction with propofol, with a P value of 0.007 and 0.032, respectively, obtained in within-group comparison.

Conclusion: Propofol and etomidate were comparable in airway mechanics, but compliance and tidal volumes improved with propofol, which facilitated face mask ventilation.

依托咪酯和异丙酚对诱导过程中气道力学的影响-一项前瞻性随机试验
背景与目的:异丙酚、依托咪酯等静脉诱导药物改变气道力学,从而影响面罩通气。这些变化对困难面罩通气情况下肌肉松弛剂的给药有影响。本研究评估了两种不同静脉注射药物后气道动力学的差异。材料与方法:经临床试验正式登记后,招募全麻患者,随机分为P组和e组。患者采用任意一种静脉用药诱导,使用呼吸机进行面罩通气。60 s后给予罗库溴铵并继续通气。在不同的时间点(诱导、放松和插管)从麻醉呼吸机测量潮气量、气道峰值压力和依从性。结果:两组患者在人口统计学、气道参数和气道力学(以潮气量、气道峰值压力和肺顺应性测量)方面无统计学差异。异丙酚诱导后潮量和顺应性均有改善,组内比较P值分别为0.007和0.032。结论:异丙酚和依托咪酯在气道力学方面具有可比性,但异丙酚改善了顺应性和潮气量,有利于面罩通气。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
129
期刊介绍: The JOACP publishes original peer-reviewed research and clinical work in all branches of anaesthesiology, pain, critical care and perioperative medicine including the application to basic sciences. In addition, the journal publishes review articles, special articles, brief communications/reports, case reports, and reports of new equipment, letters to editor, book reviews and obituaries. It is international in scope and comprehensive in coverage.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信