Carcass characteristics and breast meat quality in fast-, medium- and slow-growing chickens

IF 1.4 4区 农林科学 Q3 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Jaroslav Valenta, D. Chodová, E. Tůmová, M. Ketta
{"title":"Carcass characteristics and breast meat quality in fast-, medium- and slow-growing chickens","authors":"Jaroslav Valenta, D. Chodová, E. Tůmová, M. Ketta","doi":"10.17221/91/2022-cjas","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the present study was to compare carcass characteristics and meat quality of fast- (Ross 308), medium- (Hubbard JA757) and slow-growing (ISA Dual) chickens (n = 1 980). When the chickens reached an average live weight of 2 kg, 40 birds (males to females, 1 : 1) of each genotype were randomly selected and slaughtered for carcass analysis. Pectoralis major (PM) muscle samples were taken to determine the physical and chemical parameters of the meat quality. The fast- and medium-growing genotypes had higher (+3.24% and +3.84%, respectively) dressing out percentages than the slow-growing chickens. As expected, the breast percentage significantly decreased in the order of fast growth > medium growth > slow growth. The abdominal fat percentage was the lowest in Ross 308 chickens, but the abdominal fat percentage in JA757 and ISA Dual chickens did not differ. For edible organs, fast- and medium-growing chickens had heavier hearts and livers than slow-growing chickens. In contrast, ISA Dual chickens showed heavier gizzards. Genotype dramatically affected the chemical composition of PM muscle. The ISA Dual chickens exhibited a significantly higher proportion of dry matter and protein and lower ether extract and cholesterol content than Ross 308 chickens, with intermediate values for JA757 chickens. The ISA Dual group had a lower ash content than Ross 308 and JA757 groups. In terms of physical parameters, the ISA Dual chickens had higher lightness and yellowness and lower redness, pH 24, and cooking loss than those of the other genotypes. Concerning all genotypes, the shear force values increased from fast- to slow-growing chickens. In conclusion, this study found a difference between the genotypes. Although the slow-growing chickens showed the lowest dressing out and breast percentages compared with the other genotypes, the breast meat of the slow-growing chickens had more favourable nutritional properties.","PeriodicalId":10972,"journal":{"name":"Czech Journal of Animal Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Czech Journal of Animal Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17221/91/2022-cjas","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to compare carcass characteristics and meat quality of fast- (Ross 308), medium- (Hubbard JA757) and slow-growing (ISA Dual) chickens (n = 1 980). When the chickens reached an average live weight of 2 kg, 40 birds (males to females, 1 : 1) of each genotype were randomly selected and slaughtered for carcass analysis. Pectoralis major (PM) muscle samples were taken to determine the physical and chemical parameters of the meat quality. The fast- and medium-growing genotypes had higher (+3.24% and +3.84%, respectively) dressing out percentages than the slow-growing chickens. As expected, the breast percentage significantly decreased in the order of fast growth > medium growth > slow growth. The abdominal fat percentage was the lowest in Ross 308 chickens, but the abdominal fat percentage in JA757 and ISA Dual chickens did not differ. For edible organs, fast- and medium-growing chickens had heavier hearts and livers than slow-growing chickens. In contrast, ISA Dual chickens showed heavier gizzards. Genotype dramatically affected the chemical composition of PM muscle. The ISA Dual chickens exhibited a significantly higher proportion of dry matter and protein and lower ether extract and cholesterol content than Ross 308 chickens, with intermediate values for JA757 chickens. The ISA Dual group had a lower ash content than Ross 308 and JA757 groups. In terms of physical parameters, the ISA Dual chickens had higher lightness and yellowness and lower redness, pH 24, and cooking loss than those of the other genotypes. Concerning all genotypes, the shear force values increased from fast- to slow-growing chickens. In conclusion, this study found a difference between the genotypes. Although the slow-growing chickens showed the lowest dressing out and breast percentages compared with the other genotypes, the breast meat of the slow-growing chickens had more favourable nutritional properties.
快、中、慢生长鸡的胴体特性和胸肉品质
本研究的目的是比较快速(Ross 308)、中等(Hubbard JA757)和缓慢生长(ISA Dual)鸡(n=1980)的胴体特性和肉质。当鸡的平均活重达到2公斤时,40只鸡(雄性对雌性,1只 : 1) 随机选择每个基因型的,并屠宰用于胴体分析。采集大胸肌(PM)样品,测定肉质的物理和化学参数。快速和中等生长基因型的出栏率高于慢速生长鸡(分别为+3.24%和+3.84%)。不出所料,乳房百分比按快速生长>中等生长>缓慢生长的顺序显著下降。Ross308鸡的腹部脂肪百分比最低,但JA757和ISA Dual鸡的腹部脂百分比没有差异。就可食用器官而言,快速和中等生长的鸡的心脏和肝脏比慢速生长的鸡重。与此相反,ISA Dual鸡表现出更重的Gizmo。基因型显著影响PM肌肉的化学成分。ISA Dual鸡的干物质和蛋白质比例明显高于Ross 308鸡,醚提取物和胆固醇含量较低,JA757鸡的值为中等。ISA Dual组的灰分含量低于Ross 308和JA757组。在物理参数方面,ISA双基因鸡比其他基因型鸡具有更高的亮度和黄色,较低的发红、pH 24和烹饪损失。就所有基因型而言,剪切力值从生长快的鸡增加到生长慢的鸡。总之,这项研究发现了基因型之间的差异。尽管与其他基因型相比,生长缓慢的鸡的出鞘率和胸脯率最低,但生长缓慢的鸡肉的胸脯肉具有更有利的营养特性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Czech Journal of Animal Science
Czech Journal of Animal Science Agriculture, Dairy & Animal Science-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
16.70%
发文量
44
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: Original scientific papers and critical reviews covering all areas of genetics and breeding, physiology, reproduction, nutrition and feeds, technology, ethology and economics of cattle, pig, sheep, goat, poultry, fish and other farm animal management. Papers are published in English.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信