Systematic Review of Health Literacy and Health Promotion in School-Aged Adolescents

Q3 Social Sciences
S. Khanal, C. Budhathoki, O. Okan, E. V. Teijlingen, M. Sharma, J. Acharya, Cate Wood
{"title":"Systematic Review of Health Literacy and Health Promotion in School-Aged Adolescents","authors":"S. Khanal, C. Budhathoki, O. Okan, E. V. Teijlingen, M. Sharma, J. Acharya, Cate Wood","doi":"10.34172/jech.2023.1982","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The literature has identified gaps in adolescent health literacy (AHL) measurements, as well as how the health literacy (HL) level is related to health promotion (HP) aspects. This study aimed to examine the tools used to measure HL and determine its relation with HP among adolescents. Methods: Three online databases (HINARI, PubMed, and DOAJ) were searched to conduct a systematic assessment of papers published between January 1, 2016, and January 1, 2021. In this review, 373 articles were identified from these databases. After removing duplicates and screening titles and abstracts of articles, 49 full texts were selected for full-text reading. After comprehensive reading, 23 papers were appraised for qualitative synthesis. Results: Of the 23 reviewed papers, 21 focused on assessing AHL measures, and 15 addressed the association between AHL and HP. Seven studies used the HL School-Aged Children instrument. The findings suggested that the methodological and conceptual underpinnings of HL measures are insufficient. Furthermore, HL acts as an independent and positive mediator for many facets of HP. Conclusion: This review offers a warning to practitioners and educationists interested in measuring HL as the number of measurement tools is quite huge with different tools applying different scales.","PeriodicalId":36491,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education and Community Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education and Community Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/jech.2023.1982","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The literature has identified gaps in adolescent health literacy (AHL) measurements, as well as how the health literacy (HL) level is related to health promotion (HP) aspects. This study aimed to examine the tools used to measure HL and determine its relation with HP among adolescents. Methods: Three online databases (HINARI, PubMed, and DOAJ) were searched to conduct a systematic assessment of papers published between January 1, 2016, and January 1, 2021. In this review, 373 articles were identified from these databases. After removing duplicates and screening titles and abstracts of articles, 49 full texts were selected for full-text reading. After comprehensive reading, 23 papers were appraised for qualitative synthesis. Results: Of the 23 reviewed papers, 21 focused on assessing AHL measures, and 15 addressed the association between AHL and HP. Seven studies used the HL School-Aged Children instrument. The findings suggested that the methodological and conceptual underpinnings of HL measures are insufficient. Furthermore, HL acts as an independent and positive mediator for many facets of HP. Conclusion: This review offers a warning to practitioners and educationists interested in measuring HL as the number of measurement tools is quite huge with different tools applying different scales.
学龄青少年健康素养与健康促进的系统评价
背景:文献已经确定了青少年健康素养(AHL)测量的差距,以及健康素养(HL)水平与健康促进(HP)方面的关系。本研究旨在检验用于测量HL的工具,并确定其与青少年HP的关系。方法:检索三个在线数据库(HINARI、PubMed和DOAJ),对2016年1月1日至2021年1月31日期间发表的论文进行系统评估。在这篇综述中,从这些数据库中确定了373篇文章。在去除重复并筛选文章标题和摘要后,选择49篇全文进行全文阅读。经过综合阅读,对23篇论文进行了定性综合评价。结果:在23篇综述的论文中,21篇侧重于评估AHL测量,15篇涉及AHL和HP之间的关联。七项研究使用了HL学龄儿童仪器。研究结果表明,HL措施的方法和概念基础不足。此外,HL在HP的许多方面起着独立和积极的中介作用。结论:这篇综述向有兴趣测量HL的从业者和教育家提供了警告,因为测量工具的数量非常巨大,不同的工具应用不同的量表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Education and Community Health
Journal of Education and Community Health Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信