Introduction to “Art, Signs, and Cultures” (1977)

IF 0.2 2区 艺术学 0 ART
ARTMargins Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1162/artm_a_00354
Joshua I. Cohen
{"title":"Introduction to “Art, Signs, and Cultures” (1977)","authors":"Joshua I. Cohen","doi":"10.1162/artm_a_00354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This document, translated from the original French, is an edited transcript of a conversation between the Senegalese painter Iba Ndiaye, the French art historian Jean Laude, and a moderator, Roger Pillaudin. It took place on the occasion of the Festival des arts et cultures africaines in Royan, France (March 1977), and was later broadcast on the radio channel France Culture. What stands out in the conversation is the way Laude seeks to negate Ndiaye's cross-cultural experience and background, and arguably his very legitimacy as a contemporary artist. Laude's insistence on adhering to neat categories (linguistic, national, artistic) in engaging with Ndiaye, coupled with Ndiaye's steady defiance of these categories, point to broader tensions between structuralism and area studies, on the one hand, and poststructuralism and postcolonial studies, on the other. The conversation also invites careful scrutiny of the problem of Eurocentrism, in the sense that Laude's structuralist position is in fact anti-Eurocentric: colonialism is condemned for destroying local traditions, which are in turn revered at the expense of allegedly derivative expressions emerging from the same societies. Ndiaye nevertheless holds his own against Laude's aggressive paternalism, and manages to call into question a number of the art historian's assumptions around the perceived axes and obligations of artistic identity.","PeriodicalId":41203,"journal":{"name":"ARTMargins","volume":"12 1","pages":"106-111"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARTMargins","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/artm_a_00354","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This document, translated from the original French, is an edited transcript of a conversation between the Senegalese painter Iba Ndiaye, the French art historian Jean Laude, and a moderator, Roger Pillaudin. It took place on the occasion of the Festival des arts et cultures africaines in Royan, France (March 1977), and was later broadcast on the radio channel France Culture. What stands out in the conversation is the way Laude seeks to negate Ndiaye's cross-cultural experience and background, and arguably his very legitimacy as a contemporary artist. Laude's insistence on adhering to neat categories (linguistic, national, artistic) in engaging with Ndiaye, coupled with Ndiaye's steady defiance of these categories, point to broader tensions between structuralism and area studies, on the one hand, and poststructuralism and postcolonial studies, on the other. The conversation also invites careful scrutiny of the problem of Eurocentrism, in the sense that Laude's structuralist position is in fact anti-Eurocentric: colonialism is condemned for destroying local traditions, which are in turn revered at the expense of allegedly derivative expressions emerging from the same societies. Ndiaye nevertheless holds his own against Laude's aggressive paternalism, and manages to call into question a number of the art historian's assumptions around the perceived axes and obligations of artistic identity.
《艺术、符号和文化》导论(1977)
本文件由法语原文翻译而来,是塞内加尔画家伊巴·恩迪亚耶(Iba Ndiaye)、法国艺术史学家让·劳德(Jean Laude)和主持人罗杰·皮劳丁(Roger Pillaudin)之间对话的编辑实录。它是在1977年3月在法国罗扬举行的非洲人艺术文化节期间举行的,后来在法国文化广播频道播出。对话中最突出的是劳德试图否定恩迪亚耶的跨文化经历和背景,以及他作为当代艺术家的合法性。劳德在与恩迪亚耶接触时坚持遵循整洁的范畴(语言、民族、艺术),加上恩迪亚耶对这些范畴的坚定蔑视,表明了结构主义和区域研究与后结构主义和后殖民研究之间更广泛的紧张关系。对话也引起了对欧洲中心主义问题的仔细审视,从某种意义上说,劳德的结构主义立场实际上是反欧洲中心主义的:殖民主义因破坏当地传统而受到谴责,而这些传统反过来又以从同一社会中出现的所谓衍生表达为代价而受到尊敬。尽管如此,恩迪亚耶还是坚持反对劳德咄咄逼人的家长式作风,并设法对这位艺术史学家围绕艺术身份的感知轴和义务的一些假设提出质疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ARTMargins
ARTMargins ART-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: ARTMargins publishes scholarly articles and essays about contemporary art, media, architecture, and critical theory. ARTMargins studies art practices and visual culture in the emerging global margins, from North Africa and the Middle East to the Americas, Eastern and Western Europe, Asia and Australasia. The journal acts as a forum for scholars, theoreticians, and critics from a variety of disciplines who are interested in art and politics in transitional countries and regions; postsocialism and neo-liberalism; postmodernism and postcolonialism, and their critiques; and the problem of global art and global art history and its methodologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信