Amnestic MCI Patients’ Perspectives on Volunteer Participation in a Research Context

G. Vanderschaeghe, J. Schaeverbeke, R. Vandenberghe, K. Dierickx
{"title":"Amnestic MCI Patients’ Perspectives on Volunteer Participation in a Research Context","authors":"G. Vanderschaeghe, J. Schaeverbeke, R. Vandenberghe, K. Dierickx","doi":"10.4172/2155-9627.1000305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Inclusion of patients in research studies is immensely important when evaluating new biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and when the efficacy of possible treatment options is under trial investigation. If medical treatment is to advance in slowing the progression of AD, or even preventing it, voluntary participation of patients is not only important but also their reliable participation is key. To get closer in achieving this goal, researchers need to understand better what motivates research participants to enroll in a clinical trial and get insight into participants’ expectations about their participation. Furthermore, what researchers perceive as benefits and risks of a study can differ from participants’ view. This difference could lead to a situation in which researchers recruit fewer subjects than they expected or result in unreliable research subject participation.Method: We conducted semi-structured in-depth interviews in 38 patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) as part of a clinical trial (EUDRACT no. 2013-004671-12) on the predictive value of biomarkers for AD. Patients had the option of receiving their Individual Research Results (IRR; visual binary read amyloid PET results). In this study, the motivations and perceived advantages and disadvantages of trial participation were investigated from the patients’ perspective. Before deciding to participate, patients received an information brochure describing the possible benefits and risks of participation.Results: The two most frequently mentioned reasons for volunteering for the trial were to contribute to scientific progress and to receive their IRRs. Participating to ameliorate scientific progress was not solely motivated by altruistic reasons; it was mostly mentioned along with the possibility of receiving a valuable result about their health condition, suggesting that self-interest also motivated patients to participate. The two most frequently mentioned disadvantages were the possible risks related to being subjected to invasive medical procedures and that volunteering was considered to be time consuming. Most patients felt that their partner and children supported their decision to enroll in the biomarker study.Conclusion: aMCI patients have several reasons for wanting to volunteer in a clinical trial, with the option of IRR disclosure being the primary motivation for enrolling. Most of our patients felt that family members supported their decision to volunteer. However, researchers need to be cautious when recruiting subjects for clinical trials by ensuring that they truly desire to participate in the study and those family members are not coercing them into doing so. In addition, what the information brochure mentions as possible benefits and risks of trial participation was not always perceived similarly by patients.","PeriodicalId":89408,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical research & bioethics","volume":"8 1","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4172/2155-9627.1000305","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical research & bioethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-9627.1000305","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Inclusion of patients in research studies is immensely important when evaluating new biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and when the efficacy of possible treatment options is under trial investigation. If medical treatment is to advance in slowing the progression of AD, or even preventing it, voluntary participation of patients is not only important but also their reliable participation is key. To get closer in achieving this goal, researchers need to understand better what motivates research participants to enroll in a clinical trial and get insight into participants’ expectations about their participation. Furthermore, what researchers perceive as benefits and risks of a study can differ from participants’ view. This difference could lead to a situation in which researchers recruit fewer subjects than they expected or result in unreliable research subject participation.Method: We conducted semi-structured in-depth interviews in 38 patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) as part of a clinical trial (EUDRACT no. 2013-004671-12) on the predictive value of biomarkers for AD. Patients had the option of receiving their Individual Research Results (IRR; visual binary read amyloid PET results). In this study, the motivations and perceived advantages and disadvantages of trial participation were investigated from the patients’ perspective. Before deciding to participate, patients received an information brochure describing the possible benefits and risks of participation.Results: The two most frequently mentioned reasons for volunteering for the trial were to contribute to scientific progress and to receive their IRRs. Participating to ameliorate scientific progress was not solely motivated by altruistic reasons; it was mostly mentioned along with the possibility of receiving a valuable result about their health condition, suggesting that self-interest also motivated patients to participate. The two most frequently mentioned disadvantages were the possible risks related to being subjected to invasive medical procedures and that volunteering was considered to be time consuming. Most patients felt that their partner and children supported their decision to enroll in the biomarker study.Conclusion: aMCI patients have several reasons for wanting to volunteer in a clinical trial, with the option of IRR disclosure being the primary motivation for enrolling. Most of our patients felt that family members supported their decision to volunteer. However, researchers need to be cautious when recruiting subjects for clinical trials by ensuring that they truly desire to participate in the study and those family members are not coercing them into doing so. In addition, what the information brochure mentions as possible benefits and risks of trial participation was not always perceived similarly by patients.
研究背景下老年MCI患者对志愿者参与的看法
背景:在评估阿尔茨海默病(AD)的新生物标志物以及可能的治疗方案正在试验研究时,将患者纳入研究是非常重要的。如果医学治疗要在减缓阿尔茨海默病的进展,甚至是预防阿尔茨海默病方面取得进展,患者的自愿参与不仅重要,而且他们可靠的参与是关键。为了更接近实现这一目标,研究人员需要更好地了解是什么促使研究参与者参加临床试验,并深入了解参与者对他们参与的期望。此外,研究人员对研究的好处和风险的看法可能与参与者的看法不同。这种差异可能导致研究人员招募的受试者少于他们预期的情况,或者导致不可靠的研究受试者参与。方法:我们对38例健忘轻度认知障碍(aMCI)患者进行了半结构化的深度访谈,作为临床试验(EUDRACT no. 6)的一部分。2013-004671-12)关于生物标志物对AD的预测价值。患者可以选择接受他们的个人研究结果(IRR;视觉二进制读取淀粉样蛋白PET结果)。在本研究中,我们从患者的角度调查了参与试验的动机和感知的利与弊。在决定参与之前,患者会收到一份描述参与可能的益处和风险的信息手册。结果:自愿参加试验的两个最常提到的原因是为科学进步做出贡献和收到他们的内部收益率。参与促进科学进步并不完全是出于利他的原因;大多数情况下,它与获得有关其健康状况的有价值结果的可能性一起被提到,这表明自利也激励了患者参与。最常提到的两个缺点是,可能有接受侵入性医疗程序的风险,以及志愿服务被认为耗时。大多数患者认为他们的伴侣和孩子支持他们参加生物标志物研究的决定。结论:aMCI患者有几个原因想要自愿参加临床试验,选择IRR披露是入组的主要动机。我们的大多数病人都觉得家人支持他们做志愿者的决定。然而,研究人员在为临床试验招募受试者时需要谨慎,确保他们真正希望参与研究,并且那些家庭成员没有强迫他们这样做。此外,信息手册中提到的参与试验可能的益处和风险,患者并不总是有相同的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信