Thermal tumor ablation therapy:Implications in Radio and Chemo-sensitization

Deepak P. Kumar
{"title":"Thermal tumor ablation therapy:Implications in Radio and Chemo-sensitization","authors":"Deepak P. Kumar","doi":"10.31579/2640-1053/002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is well established that tumors are unable to grow beyond a certain size (1-2 mm) unless they acquire their own blood supply via angiogenesis. Also, angiogenesis helps tumors to invade adjacent tissues and metastasize to distant sites [1]. Therefore, it has been postulated that interfering with the blood supply using anti-angiogenic therapies will destroy the tumor [2]. However, there is an emerging alternative concept that depriving the tumor of its blood supply interferes with the delivery of chemotherapeutic agents to the tumor and creates an unfavorable hypoxic environment that compromises the action of radiotherapy [3]. This concept was supported by the modest responses to anti-angiogenic therapies in clinical trials and the lack of any impact on patient’s survival when antiangiogenic drugs are administered as single agents [4]. Although, Hurwitz et al. [5] have shown that combining the antiangiogenic drug, bevacizumab with chemotherapy significantly improved survival among metastatic colorectal cancer patients. Still, other studies demonstrated reductions in tumor concentrations of chemotherapy or effectiveness of radiotherapy when antiangiogenic drugs were co-administered [6-8]. Even when antiangiogenic drugs yielded significant effects on the growth of some tumors such as renal cell carcinoma, cervical cancer, and ovarian cancer, they failed to demonstrate significant improvements in patients’ survival [9,10]. Furthermore, complete resistance to antiangiogenic therapies has been reported for prostate and pancreatic adenocarcinoma and melanoma that might be attributed to the redundant involvement of several angiogenic factors that are difficult to be targeted by a single anti-angiogenic agent in some tumors [11-13]. To explain this inconsistency, further research is needed for better understanding of the underlying cellular and molecular mechanisms of tumor vascularization and its interaction with cancer therapies in different tumor beds.","PeriodicalId":93018,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cancer research and cellular therapeutics","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cancer research and cellular therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31579/2640-1053/002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is well established that tumors are unable to grow beyond a certain size (1-2 mm) unless they acquire their own blood supply via angiogenesis. Also, angiogenesis helps tumors to invade adjacent tissues and metastasize to distant sites [1]. Therefore, it has been postulated that interfering with the blood supply using anti-angiogenic therapies will destroy the tumor [2]. However, there is an emerging alternative concept that depriving the tumor of its blood supply interferes with the delivery of chemotherapeutic agents to the tumor and creates an unfavorable hypoxic environment that compromises the action of radiotherapy [3]. This concept was supported by the modest responses to anti-angiogenic therapies in clinical trials and the lack of any impact on patient’s survival when antiangiogenic drugs are administered as single agents [4]. Although, Hurwitz et al. [5] have shown that combining the antiangiogenic drug, bevacizumab with chemotherapy significantly improved survival among metastatic colorectal cancer patients. Still, other studies demonstrated reductions in tumor concentrations of chemotherapy or effectiveness of radiotherapy when antiangiogenic drugs were co-administered [6-8]. Even when antiangiogenic drugs yielded significant effects on the growth of some tumors such as renal cell carcinoma, cervical cancer, and ovarian cancer, they failed to demonstrate significant improvements in patients’ survival [9,10]. Furthermore, complete resistance to antiangiogenic therapies has been reported for prostate and pancreatic adenocarcinoma and melanoma that might be attributed to the redundant involvement of several angiogenic factors that are difficult to be targeted by a single anti-angiogenic agent in some tumors [11-13]. To explain this inconsistency, further research is needed for better understanding of the underlying cellular and molecular mechanisms of tumor vascularization and its interaction with cancer therapies in different tumor beds.
肿瘤热消融治疗:放疗和化疗增敏的意义
众所周知,除非肿瘤通过血管生成获得自己的血液供应,否则肿瘤无法生长超过一定大小(1-2毫米)。此外,血管生成有助于肿瘤侵入邻近组织并转移到远处。因此,有人假设使用抗血管生成疗法干扰血液供应将破坏肿瘤血凝块。然而,有一种新兴的替代概念认为,剥夺肿瘤的血液供应会干扰化疗药物向肿瘤的输送,并产生不利的缺氧环境,从而损害放射治疗的作用。这一概念得到了临床试验中抗血管生成治疗的适度反应的支持,并且当抗血管生成药物作为单一药物使用时,对患者的生存没有任何影响。尽管Hurwitz等人已经证明,抗血管生成药物贝伐单抗联合化疗可显著提高转移性结直肠癌患者的生存率。然而,其他研究表明,当联合使用抗血管生成药物时,化疗的肿瘤浓度或放疗的有效性降低[6-8]。即使抗血管生成药物对肾细胞癌、宫颈癌和卵巢癌等肿瘤的生长有显著影响,但它们未能显示出对患者生存的显著改善[9,10]。此外,有报道称前列腺癌、胰腺腺癌和黑色素瘤对抗血管生成治疗完全耐药,这可能是由于多种血管生成因子的重复参与,而在某些肿瘤中,单一抗血管生成药物难以靶向这些因子[11-13]。为了解释这种不一致,需要进一步的研究来更好地理解肿瘤血管化的潜在细胞和分子机制及其与不同肿瘤床的癌症治疗的相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信