UNTRUSTWORTHINESS IN STUDENT TEAMS: a CROSS-CULTURAL COMPARISON BETWEEN DIFFERENT THINKING CULTURES OF THE U.S. AND SOUTH KOREA

Q2 Social Sciences
Sohyoun Shin, M. Meuter
{"title":"UNTRUSTWORTHINESS IN STUDENT TEAMS: a CROSS-CULTURAL COMPARISON BETWEEN DIFFERENT THINKING CULTURES OF THE U.S. AND SOUTH KOREA","authors":"Sohyoun Shin, M. Meuter","doi":"10.1080/10528008.2022.2122726","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT An investigation of how untrustworthy student team member behavior relates to three important student team variables (teamwork, perceived team effectiveness, and student team satisfaction) is conducted across two cultures. Students from South Korea (representing holistic thinking styles) and U.S. students (representing analytic thinking styles) were found to have a consistent set of relationships. Untrustworthiness in student teams was found to negatively impact teamwork and perceived team effectiveness across both samples. Teamwork had a positive impact on perceived team effectiveness, and perceived team effectiveness was also found to have a direct, positive impact on student team satisfaction in both samples. However, there were also several important cultural differences uncovered in this study. As predicted, students representing holistic thinking styles were seen to have a direct (negative) relationship between untrustworthiness and student team satisfaction as well as a direct (positive) relationship between teamwork and student team satisfaction. These relationships were not expected to be found in the students representing analytic thinking styles. These findings contribute to our understanding of how to most effectively teach and develop pedagogical strategies with an increasingly diverse population of students. Implications and directions for future research are also highlighted in the research.","PeriodicalId":37208,"journal":{"name":"Marketing Education Review","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marketing Education Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10528008.2022.2122726","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT An investigation of how untrustworthy student team member behavior relates to three important student team variables (teamwork, perceived team effectiveness, and student team satisfaction) is conducted across two cultures. Students from South Korea (representing holistic thinking styles) and U.S. students (representing analytic thinking styles) were found to have a consistent set of relationships. Untrustworthiness in student teams was found to negatively impact teamwork and perceived team effectiveness across both samples. Teamwork had a positive impact on perceived team effectiveness, and perceived team effectiveness was also found to have a direct, positive impact on student team satisfaction in both samples. However, there were also several important cultural differences uncovered in this study. As predicted, students representing holistic thinking styles were seen to have a direct (negative) relationship between untrustworthiness and student team satisfaction as well as a direct (positive) relationship between teamwork and student team satisfaction. These relationships were not expected to be found in the students representing analytic thinking styles. These findings contribute to our understanding of how to most effectively teach and develop pedagogical strategies with an increasingly diverse population of students. Implications and directions for future research are also highlighted in the research.
学生团队中的不信任感:美国与韩国不同思维文化的跨文化比较
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Marketing Education Review
Marketing Education Review Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书