“You Don’t Have to Share Everything, You Know”: College Students’ Decisions to Withhold Information From Parents

IF 2.6 3区 心理学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES
Anne C. Fletcher, Brittany N. Alligood, Melissa Chacon-Villalobos
{"title":"“You Don’t Have to Share Everything, You Know”: College Students’ Decisions to Withhold Information From Parents","authors":"Anne C. Fletcher, Brittany N. Alligood, Melissa Chacon-Villalobos","doi":"10.1177/21676968231178855","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"American college students (N = 61) participated in semi-structured qualitative interviews focused on identifying topics students avoided discussing with their parents and reasons for avoiding these discussions. Interviews were transcribed and data analyzed using a cross-case, variable-oriented approach. Students discussed avoiding seven topics in conversations with parents. In order of frequency these were: Romantic Relationships and Sex; Physical and Mental Well-Being; School Decisions and Grades; Friends; Parties, Alcohol and Drug Use; Family Matters; and Personal Beliefs and Lifestyle Choices. Reasons for avoiding discussions with parents yielded four distinct parent-student relationship types: Appropriate Boundaries (43%), Guarding Privacy (30%), Protective of Parents (15%), and Disconnected (13%). Avoided topics associated with these relationship types and the ways in which students in these relationship types reflected on avoidance of topics with parents suggested distinct ways in which students negotiated components of autonomy development during the college years.","PeriodicalId":47330,"journal":{"name":"Emerging Adulthood","volume":"11 1","pages":"893 - 908"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emerging Adulthood","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21676968231178855","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

American college students (N = 61) participated in semi-structured qualitative interviews focused on identifying topics students avoided discussing with their parents and reasons for avoiding these discussions. Interviews were transcribed and data analyzed using a cross-case, variable-oriented approach. Students discussed avoiding seven topics in conversations with parents. In order of frequency these were: Romantic Relationships and Sex; Physical and Mental Well-Being; School Decisions and Grades; Friends; Parties, Alcohol and Drug Use; Family Matters; and Personal Beliefs and Lifestyle Choices. Reasons for avoiding discussions with parents yielded four distinct parent-student relationship types: Appropriate Boundaries (43%), Guarding Privacy (30%), Protective of Parents (15%), and Disconnected (13%). Avoided topics associated with these relationship types and the ways in which students in these relationship types reflected on avoidance of topics with parents suggested distinct ways in which students negotiated components of autonomy development during the college years.
“你不需要分享一切,你知道”:大学生对父母隐瞒信息的决定
美国大学生(N = 61)参加了半结构化定性访谈,重点是确定学生避免与父母讨论的话题以及避免这些讨论的原因。访谈记录和数据分析使用跨案例,变量导向的方法。学生们讨论了与家长交谈时应避免的7个话题。按频率排序是:恋爱关系和性;身心健康;学校决定和成绩;朋友;聚会、酗酒和吸毒;家庭事务;以及个人信仰和生活方式的选择。避免与父母讨论的原因产生了四种不同的亲子关系类型:适当的界限(43%)、保护隐私(30%)、保护父母(15%)和疏远(13%)。避免与这些关系类型相关的话题以及这些关系类型的学生与父母回避话题的方式表明,学生在大学期间谈判自主发展组成部分的不同方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Emerging Adulthood
Emerging Adulthood Multiple-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
19.20%
发文量
87
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信