“Sweet Spot” for Reflection in Problem-oriented Education

Q4 Social Sciences
Lorenzo Duchi, Virginie F. C. Servant‐Miklos, Loïs Kooij, Liesbeth Noordegraaf-Eelens
{"title":"“Sweet Spot” for Reflection in Problem-oriented Education","authors":"Lorenzo Duchi, Virginie F. C. Servant‐Miklos, Loïs Kooij, Liesbeth Noordegraaf-Eelens","doi":"10.54337/ojs.jpblhe.v11i1.7370","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the impact of a structured, multi-dimensional reflection track of a 16-week pilot programme in experimental pedagogics (XP) in The Netherlands. XP is an elective undergraduate programme in which students investigate socially relevant educational problems in local communities and design educational interventions to address these issues through problem-oriented project work (PPL). To accompany the learning journey, students follow a reflection track structured with workshops, learning diaries, and articulated learning essays, that covers cognitive, phenomenological, relational, social and global dimensions of reflection. The design of the track was informed by an interdisciplinary reflection framework combining inputs from cognitive and critical paradigms. To evaluate and improve the impact of this novel approach to reflection in problem-oriented education, the authors undertook an Education Action Research (EAR) process with the 17 participating students. The evaluation phase of the EAR was conducted using a phenomenographic design to draw out qualitative variations in conceptions of reflection among students who participated in the pilot. Focusing on variations of conceptions allowed the teachers-as-action-researchers to gain a fine-grained understanding of reflection within the XP problem-oriented setting. The findings reveal an outcome space comprising seven increasingly complex reflection categories. A phenomenographic analysis of the categories led us to conclude that there exists a reflection “sweet spot” inside which there is growth in reflection breadth and depth. Outside the sweet spot, students either do not reflect at all, or become so entangled in reflection that an infinite reflection regress appears to derail learning. We conclude by discussing the contributions of these findings to strengthening critical, socially relevant reflection in problem-oriented project work in the context of current global crises, focusing on the role of supervisors in fostering productive reflection. ","PeriodicalId":30535,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Problem Based Learning in Higher Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Problem Based Learning in Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54337/ojs.jpblhe.v11i1.7370","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper examines the impact of a structured, multi-dimensional reflection track of a 16-week pilot programme in experimental pedagogics (XP) in The Netherlands. XP is an elective undergraduate programme in which students investigate socially relevant educational problems in local communities and design educational interventions to address these issues through problem-oriented project work (PPL). To accompany the learning journey, students follow a reflection track structured with workshops, learning diaries, and articulated learning essays, that covers cognitive, phenomenological, relational, social and global dimensions of reflection. The design of the track was informed by an interdisciplinary reflection framework combining inputs from cognitive and critical paradigms. To evaluate and improve the impact of this novel approach to reflection in problem-oriented education, the authors undertook an Education Action Research (EAR) process with the 17 participating students. The evaluation phase of the EAR was conducted using a phenomenographic design to draw out qualitative variations in conceptions of reflection among students who participated in the pilot. Focusing on variations of conceptions allowed the teachers-as-action-researchers to gain a fine-grained understanding of reflection within the XP problem-oriented setting. The findings reveal an outcome space comprising seven increasingly complex reflection categories. A phenomenographic analysis of the categories led us to conclude that there exists a reflection “sweet spot” inside which there is growth in reflection breadth and depth. Outside the sweet spot, students either do not reflect at all, or become so entangled in reflection that an infinite reflection regress appears to derail learning. We conclude by discussing the contributions of these findings to strengthening critical, socially relevant reflection in problem-oriented project work in the context of current global crises, focusing on the role of supervisors in fostering productive reflection. 
问题导向教育中反思的“甜点”
本文考察了荷兰为期16周的实验教育学(XP)试点项目的结构化、多维反思轨道的影响。XP是一门选修本科生课程,学生们调查当地社区中与社会相关的教育问题,并通过以问题为导向的项目工作(PPL)设计教育干预措施来解决这些问题。为了陪伴学习之旅,学生们遵循一条反思轨道,该轨道由研讨会、学习日记和清晰的学习文章组成,涵盖了反思的认知、现象学、关系、社会和全球维度。赛道的设计是由一个跨学科的反思框架提供的,该框架结合了认知和批判性范式的投入。为了评估和改进这种新的反思方法在问题导向教育中的影响,作者对17名参与学生进行了教育行动研究(EAR)。EAR的评估阶段是使用现象学设计进行的,以绘制参与试点的学生反思概念的定性变化。关注概念的变化使作为行动研究者的教师能够在XP问题导向的环境中获得对反思的精细理解。研究结果揭示了一个由七个日益复杂的反思类别组成的结果空间。对这些类别的现象学分析使我们得出结论,存在一个反射“甜蜜点”,在这个反射“甜蜜点通过”内,反射的广度和深度都在增长。在最佳点之外,学生要么根本不反思,要么陷入反思,以至于无限的反思倒退似乎会破坏学习。最后,我们讨论了这些发现对在当前全球危机的背景下,在以问题为导向的项目工作中加强批判性的、与社会相关的反思的贡献,重点讨论了主管在促进富有成效的反思中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信