Judith JM. Jans , Melissa H. Broeks , Nanda M. Verhoeven-Duif
{"title":"Metabolomics in diagnostics of inborn metabolic disorders","authors":"Judith JM. Jans , Melissa H. Broeks , Nanda M. Verhoeven-Duif","doi":"10.1016/j.coisb.2021.100409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Finding a diagnosis for patients with a rare inborn metabolic disorder can be a long and difficult path. Whereas next generation sequencing is now a commonly used modality, which has significantly impacted the diagnostic yield and speed, next generation metabolic screening through untargeted metabolomics is next in line to prove its value in the diagnostic trajectory.</p><p>Untargeted metabolomics, often based on mass spectrometry platforms, is a well-established technology for the identification of novel disease markers. However, untargeted metabolomics as first line diagnostics for rare disease is now only gradually making its way into clinical practice. Most retrospective studies show that the majority of inborn metabolic disorder can be detected through untargeted metabolomics. Some diseases will still go undetected, which diagnoses are missed depends on the specific metabolomics method chosen; there is no single all-encompassing platform. Therefore, careful assessments of the opportunities and limitations are currently undertaken in prospective studies, combining untargeted metabolomics in the diagnostics setting with the current gold standard genetic and biochemical diagnostic modalities. These studies show an increased diagnostic yield when implementing untargeted metabolomics. Given the continuing technological advances, defining the optimal timing, place, and order of the various diagnostic modalities will keep on evolving in the foreseen future.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37400,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Systems Biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452310021001049/pdfft?md5=967143ed4644a1e92c1cb82efc3ba605&pid=1-s2.0-S2452310021001049-main.pdf","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Systems Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452310021001049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
Abstract
Finding a diagnosis for patients with a rare inborn metabolic disorder can be a long and difficult path. Whereas next generation sequencing is now a commonly used modality, which has significantly impacted the diagnostic yield and speed, next generation metabolic screening through untargeted metabolomics is next in line to prove its value in the diagnostic trajectory.
Untargeted metabolomics, often based on mass spectrometry platforms, is a well-established technology for the identification of novel disease markers. However, untargeted metabolomics as first line diagnostics for rare disease is now only gradually making its way into clinical practice. Most retrospective studies show that the majority of inborn metabolic disorder can be detected through untargeted metabolomics. Some diseases will still go undetected, which diagnoses are missed depends on the specific metabolomics method chosen; there is no single all-encompassing platform. Therefore, careful assessments of the opportunities and limitations are currently undertaken in prospective studies, combining untargeted metabolomics in the diagnostics setting with the current gold standard genetic and biochemical diagnostic modalities. These studies show an increased diagnostic yield when implementing untargeted metabolomics. Given the continuing technological advances, defining the optimal timing, place, and order of the various diagnostic modalities will keep on evolving in the foreseen future.
期刊介绍:
Current Opinion in Systems Biology is a new systematic review journal that aims to provide specialists with a unique and educational platform to keep up-to-date with the expanding volume of information published in the field of Systems Biology. It publishes polished, concise and timely systematic reviews and opinion articles. In addition to describing recent trends, the authors are encouraged to give their subjective opinion on the topics discussed. As this is such a broad discipline, we have determined themed sections each of which is reviewed once a year. The following areas will be covered by Current Opinion in Systems Biology: -Genomics and Epigenomics -Gene Regulation -Metabolic Networks -Cancer and Systemic Diseases -Mathematical Modelling -Big Data Acquisition and Analysis -Systems Pharmacology and Physiology -Synthetic Biology -Stem Cells, Development, and Differentiation -Systems Biology of Mold Organisms -Systems Immunology and Host-Pathogen Interaction -Systems Ecology and Evolution