The illogic of being data-driven: reasserting control and restoring balance in our relationship with data and technology in football

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
P. Gamble, L. Chia, Sian V. Allen
{"title":"The illogic of being data-driven: reasserting control and restoring balance in our relationship with data and technology in football","authors":"P. Gamble, L. Chia, Sian V. Allen","doi":"10.1080/24733938.2020.1854842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The ongoing advances and prevalence of technology in football is spurring a more prominent role for technology and data in driving decisions and practice. Sports science practitioners naturally play an integral part in the adoption of these technologies and are among the most enthusiastic proponents of a data-driven approach that promotes objective metrics and seeks to minimise or eliminate subjectivity. With the speed of these developments, there are a number of pitfalls that have been overlooked. In this commentary we describe the pervasive forces driving the adoption of technology solutions and critically examine the logic underpinning the present drive for metrics-based practice in football. In addition to highlighting some important gaps in what we are presently able to capture, we uncover some common flaws in how we implement new technology and use data. We propose that there is a fundamental need to reframe how we are seeking to employ data and more specifically make the necessary switch from being data-driven to data-informed. We propose some solutions to assist practitioners in being purposeful in their use of these tools and leverage the benefits of technology and data in a way that better supports decision-making and complements coaching practice.","PeriodicalId":48512,"journal":{"name":"Science and Medicine in Football","volume":"4 1","pages":"338 - 341"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/24733938.2020.1854842","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science and Medicine in Football","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24733938.2020.1854842","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

ABSTRACT The ongoing advances and prevalence of technology in football is spurring a more prominent role for technology and data in driving decisions and practice. Sports science practitioners naturally play an integral part in the adoption of these technologies and are among the most enthusiastic proponents of a data-driven approach that promotes objective metrics and seeks to minimise or eliminate subjectivity. With the speed of these developments, there are a number of pitfalls that have been overlooked. In this commentary we describe the pervasive forces driving the adoption of technology solutions and critically examine the logic underpinning the present drive for metrics-based practice in football. In addition to highlighting some important gaps in what we are presently able to capture, we uncover some common flaws in how we implement new technology and use data. We propose that there is a fundamental need to reframe how we are seeking to employ data and more specifically make the necessary switch from being data-driven to data-informed. We propose some solutions to assist practitioners in being purposeful in their use of these tools and leverage the benefits of technology and data in a way that better supports decision-making and complements coaching practice.
数据驱动的不逻辑:重新控制和恢复我们与足球数据和技术的关系的平衡
摘要技术在足球运动中的不断进步和普及,促使技术和数据在推动决策和实践中发挥着更加突出的作用。体育科学从业者自然在这些技术的采用中发挥着不可或缺的作用,他们是数据驱动方法的最热心支持者之一,该方法促进客观指标,并寻求最大限度地减少或消除主观性。随着这些发展的速度,有许多陷阱被忽视了。在这篇评论中,我们描述了推动技术解决方案采用的普遍力量,并批判性地研究了当前足球运动中基于指标的实践的逻辑。除了强调我们目前能够捕捉到的一些重要差距外,我们还发现了我们在实施新技术和使用数据方面的一些常见缺陷。我们建议,根本需要重新定义我们寻求使用数据的方式,更具体地说,从数据驱动转向数据知情。我们提出了一些解决方案,以帮助从业者有目的地使用这些工具,并以更好地支持决策和补充辅导实践的方式利用技术和数据的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
11.80%
发文量
69
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信