Detecting Local Zika Virus Transmission in the Continental United States: A Comparison of Surveillance Strategies

PLoS currents Pub Date : 2017-06-02 DOI:10.1101/145102
Steven Russell, Kyle Ryff, C. Gould, S. Martin, M. Johansson
{"title":"Detecting Local Zika Virus Transmission in the Continental United States: A Comparison of Surveillance Strategies","authors":"Steven Russell, Kyle Ryff, C. Gould, S. Martin, M. Johansson","doi":"10.1101/145102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction The 2015-2017 Zika virus (ZIKV) epidemic in the Americas has driven efforts to strengthen surveillance systems and to develop interventions, testing, and travel recommendations. In the continental U.S. and Hawaii, where limited transmission has been observed, detecting local transmission is a key public health objective. We assessed the effectiveness of three general surveillance strategies for this situation: testing all pregnant women twice during pregnancy, testing blood donations, and testing symptomatic people who seek medical care in an emergency department (ED). Methods We developed a simulation model for each surveillance strategy and simulated different transmission scenarios with varying population sizes and infection rates. We then calculated the probability of detecting transmission, the number of tests needed, and the number of false positive test results. Results The probability of detecting ZIKV transmission was highest for testing ED patients with Zika symptoms, followed by pregnant women and blood donors, in that order. The magnitude of the difference in probability of detection between strategies depended on the incidence of infection. Testing ED patients required fewer tests and resulted in fewer false positives than surveillance among pregnant women. The optimal strategy identified was to test ED patients with at least two Zika virus disease symptoms. This case definition resulted in a high probability of detection with relatively few tests and false positives. Discussion In the continental U.S. and Hawaii, where local ZIKV transmission is rare, optimizing the probability of detecting infections while minimizing resource usage is particularly important. Local surveillance strategies will be influenced by existing public health system infrastructure, but should also consider the effectiveness of different approaches. This analysis demonstrated differences across strategies and indicated that testing symptomatic ED patients is generally a more efficient strategy for detecting transmission than routine testing of pregnant women or blood donors.","PeriodicalId":74464,"journal":{"name":"PLoS currents","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS currents","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/145102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Introduction The 2015-2017 Zika virus (ZIKV) epidemic in the Americas has driven efforts to strengthen surveillance systems and to develop interventions, testing, and travel recommendations. In the continental U.S. and Hawaii, where limited transmission has been observed, detecting local transmission is a key public health objective. We assessed the effectiveness of three general surveillance strategies for this situation: testing all pregnant women twice during pregnancy, testing blood donations, and testing symptomatic people who seek medical care in an emergency department (ED). Methods We developed a simulation model for each surveillance strategy and simulated different transmission scenarios with varying population sizes and infection rates. We then calculated the probability of detecting transmission, the number of tests needed, and the number of false positive test results. Results The probability of detecting ZIKV transmission was highest for testing ED patients with Zika symptoms, followed by pregnant women and blood donors, in that order. The magnitude of the difference in probability of detection between strategies depended on the incidence of infection. Testing ED patients required fewer tests and resulted in fewer false positives than surveillance among pregnant women. The optimal strategy identified was to test ED patients with at least two Zika virus disease symptoms. This case definition resulted in a high probability of detection with relatively few tests and false positives. Discussion In the continental U.S. and Hawaii, where local ZIKV transmission is rare, optimizing the probability of detecting infections while minimizing resource usage is particularly important. Local surveillance strategies will be influenced by existing public health system infrastructure, but should also consider the effectiveness of different approaches. This analysis demonstrated differences across strategies and indicated that testing symptomatic ED patients is generally a more efficient strategy for detecting transmission than routine testing of pregnant women or blood donors.
检测美国本土寨卡病毒传播:监测策略的比较
2015-2017年寨卡病毒在美洲的流行推动了加强监测系统和制定干预措施、检测和旅行建议的努力。在已观察到有限传播的美国大陆和夏威夷,发现当地传播是一项关键的公共卫生目标。我们评估了针对这种情况的三种一般监测策略的有效性:在怀孕期间对所有孕妇进行两次检测,对献血者进行检测,对在急诊科(ED)就诊的有症状者进行检测。方法针对每种监测策略建立模拟模型,模拟不同人群规模和感染率的不同传播情景。然后,我们计算了检测到传播的概率、所需的检测次数和假阳性检测结果的数量。结果有寨卡症状的ED患者检测到寨卡病毒传播的概率最高,其次是孕妇和献血者。不同策略之间的检测概率差异的大小取决于感染的发生率。与孕妇监测相比,检测ED患者所需的检查更少,假阳性结果也更少。确定的最佳策略是测试至少有两种寨卡病毒病症状的ED患者。这种病例定义导致检测的概率很高,检测和假阳性相对较少。在美国大陆和夏威夷,当地寨卡病毒传播很少,在最大限度地减少资源使用的同时,优化检测感染的可能性尤为重要。地方监测战略将受到现有公共卫生系统基础设施的影响,但也应考虑不同方法的有效性。该分析显示了不同策略之间的差异,并表明对有症状的ED患者进行检测通常比对孕妇或献血者进行常规检测更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信