Where we have been, where we are, and where we are heading: a perspective on sales research

IF 3.9 Q2 BUSINESS
Adam Rapp, Maria Rouziou
{"title":"Where we have been, where we are, and where we are heading: a perspective on sales research","authors":"Adam Rapp, Maria Rouziou","doi":"10.1080/08853134.2023.2202325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As the new Editor of the Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, I have a vision of what I would like to achieve during my tenure and how the journal can support sales scholars and practitioners around the world. One of these notions is that I would like to provide a short editorial at the beginning of each issue that offers publishing advice, avenues for future research, or some perspective on the field that could add value to our readers, as well as engage individuals that may not be as familiar with what we are accomplishing within the sales discipline. To realize this goal, I plan to invite someone in the field to coauthor each editorial that has expertise in a specific area that is outside of my realm. For the second half of this editorial, Dr. Maria Rouziou joins me with expertise and insight on “Women in Sales.” The purpose of this article is to briefly discuss where we have been as a field and research discipline and where we are heading. As we are all getting back face-to-face, I have started networking and talking to more scholars in our field once again. Through these interactions, I have had a very profound realization–somehow, I became one of the ‘more seasoned’ researchers in our field (to put it nicely)! It seems like yesterday that I was attending AMA and the New Horizons Conference as a young doctoral student and meeting other young scholars such as Nick Lee, Stephanie Boyer, Nick Panagopoulos, Stacey Schetzsle, Chris Plouffe, Gabe Gonzalez, and many others. Surprisingly, many of these first interactions were 20 years ago and now, these are the individuals who have helped shape the field and are thought leaders in the direction we are moving. Although many young scholars see a bright and vibrant sales research field today, that was not always the case (as those mentioned above can attest). Many of us entered the field as ‘strategy’ or ‘relationship marketing’ researchers for fear of being considered ‘a sales gal/guy’ (a term I heard more than once and not in a positive light) and pigeon-holed as someone with limited research potential. While this may seem odd today for current early career scholars, believe me when I say that sales has not always been viewed in the same manner. As evidenced in Williams and Plouffe’s (2007, p. 417) 20-year content analysis, a great deal of sales research was being published but “of the articles appearing in the study time period, JM, JMR, and MS published a mere 10% of the total.” It was not uncommon to hear faculty both within and outside of the marketing discipline critique the field for being atheoretical or more vocational in nature. This state of affairs extended beyond research into academic curriculum as well. Sales courses, programs, and centers have flourished within universities and colleges throughout the United Stated and become apparent at a global level over the past few years. In the late 1990s and early 2000s, there were just a handful of these selling-focused programs. Today, however, many sales programs are the backbone of marketing departments and the heart of business colleges (and other areas). The same can be said for academic research conferences and sales competitions. There was a time when sales research was coupled with relationship marketing conference tracks with no independent focus; and, only one major sales competition existed with a few minor regional competitions. Now, the field is replete with both conferences and competitions, arguably, to a point where we have become slightly fragmented and are forced to now allocate time and financial resources across so many available options. It is interesting to compare the state of academic affairs to that of practice in the field using a similar timeframe. In the early 2000s, we heard the cry of disintermediation and how the internet would be the death of the salesperson. We quickly discovered, following the advent of the internet and CRM-based technologies, that salespeople have become more important in relationship-building and a solid sales methodology was paramount. As the sales focus grew for educational intent, so did the attention given to sales within the research domain. While negative stereotypes still existed (and probably always will), the professional role of salespeople became even more apparent. Here again today, we hear the concerns of digital marketing and the fear of AI displacing salespeople. However, I believe that most of us are mindful that the more prominent technology becomes in the field, the more important the human touch of the salesperson becomes. Looking at recent trends and projections in the marketplace, the U.S. News and World Report (2021) suggests that the growth in new and specialized products will lead to increased hiring of sales representatives. The Bureau of Labor Statistics projects a 3.7% employment growth for sales representatives between 2021 and 2031. While there is expected growth in practice, it will not come without challenges and increased expectations. As offered by the State of Sales Annual Report from Salesforce.com (2022), salespeople will be expected to: (1) maximize performance impact by achieving more difficult sales targets with fewer resources, (2) meet rising buyer expectations, (3) boost","PeriodicalId":47537,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08853134.2023.2202325","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

As the new Editor of the Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, I have a vision of what I would like to achieve during my tenure and how the journal can support sales scholars and practitioners around the world. One of these notions is that I would like to provide a short editorial at the beginning of each issue that offers publishing advice, avenues for future research, or some perspective on the field that could add value to our readers, as well as engage individuals that may not be as familiar with what we are accomplishing within the sales discipline. To realize this goal, I plan to invite someone in the field to coauthor each editorial that has expertise in a specific area that is outside of my realm. For the second half of this editorial, Dr. Maria Rouziou joins me with expertise and insight on “Women in Sales.” The purpose of this article is to briefly discuss where we have been as a field and research discipline and where we are heading. As we are all getting back face-to-face, I have started networking and talking to more scholars in our field once again. Through these interactions, I have had a very profound realization–somehow, I became one of the ‘more seasoned’ researchers in our field (to put it nicely)! It seems like yesterday that I was attending AMA and the New Horizons Conference as a young doctoral student and meeting other young scholars such as Nick Lee, Stephanie Boyer, Nick Panagopoulos, Stacey Schetzsle, Chris Plouffe, Gabe Gonzalez, and many others. Surprisingly, many of these first interactions were 20 years ago and now, these are the individuals who have helped shape the field and are thought leaders in the direction we are moving. Although many young scholars see a bright and vibrant sales research field today, that was not always the case (as those mentioned above can attest). Many of us entered the field as ‘strategy’ or ‘relationship marketing’ researchers for fear of being considered ‘a sales gal/guy’ (a term I heard more than once and not in a positive light) and pigeon-holed as someone with limited research potential. While this may seem odd today for current early career scholars, believe me when I say that sales has not always been viewed in the same manner. As evidenced in Williams and Plouffe’s (2007, p. 417) 20-year content analysis, a great deal of sales research was being published but “of the articles appearing in the study time period, JM, JMR, and MS published a mere 10% of the total.” It was not uncommon to hear faculty both within and outside of the marketing discipline critique the field for being atheoretical or more vocational in nature. This state of affairs extended beyond research into academic curriculum as well. Sales courses, programs, and centers have flourished within universities and colleges throughout the United Stated and become apparent at a global level over the past few years. In the late 1990s and early 2000s, there were just a handful of these selling-focused programs. Today, however, many sales programs are the backbone of marketing departments and the heart of business colleges (and other areas). The same can be said for academic research conferences and sales competitions. There was a time when sales research was coupled with relationship marketing conference tracks with no independent focus; and, only one major sales competition existed with a few minor regional competitions. Now, the field is replete with both conferences and competitions, arguably, to a point where we have become slightly fragmented and are forced to now allocate time and financial resources across so many available options. It is interesting to compare the state of academic affairs to that of practice in the field using a similar timeframe. In the early 2000s, we heard the cry of disintermediation and how the internet would be the death of the salesperson. We quickly discovered, following the advent of the internet and CRM-based technologies, that salespeople have become more important in relationship-building and a solid sales methodology was paramount. As the sales focus grew for educational intent, so did the attention given to sales within the research domain. While negative stereotypes still existed (and probably always will), the professional role of salespeople became even more apparent. Here again today, we hear the concerns of digital marketing and the fear of AI displacing salespeople. However, I believe that most of us are mindful that the more prominent technology becomes in the field, the more important the human touch of the salesperson becomes. Looking at recent trends and projections in the marketplace, the U.S. News and World Report (2021) suggests that the growth in new and specialized products will lead to increased hiring of sales representatives. The Bureau of Labor Statistics projects a 3.7% employment growth for sales representatives between 2021 and 2031. While there is expected growth in practice, it will not come without challenges and increased expectations. As offered by the State of Sales Annual Report from Salesforce.com (2022), salespeople will be expected to: (1) maximize performance impact by achieving more difficult sales targets with fewer resources, (2) meet rising buyer expectations, (3) boost
我们过去在哪里,现在在哪里,未来在哪里:销售研究的视角
作为《个人销售与销售管理》杂志的新主编,我有一个愿景,我想在我的任期内实现什么,以及杂志如何支持世界各地的销售学者和实践者。其中一个想法是,我想在每期的开头提供一篇简短的社论,提供出版建议,未来研究的途径,或者一些可以为我们的读者增加价值的领域的观点,以及吸引那些可能不熟悉我们在销售学科中所取得的成就的人。为了实现这一目标,我计划邀请在我的领域之外的特定领域拥有专业知识的人共同撰写每篇社论。在这篇社论的后半部分,Maria Rouziou博士和我一起分享了她对“销售中的女性”的专业知识和见解。本文的目的是简要讨论我们作为一个领域和研究学科的发展方向以及我们的发展方向。当我们都回到面对面的时候,我又开始和我们领域的更多学者交流。通过这些互动,我有了一个非常深刻的认识——不知何故,我成为了我们这个领域“更有经验”的研究人员之一(说得好点)!作为一名年轻的博士生,我参加美国医学协会和新视野会议,并会见了其他年轻学者,如尼克·李、斯蒂芬妮·博耶尔、尼克·帕纳戈波洛斯、斯泰西·舍茨勒、克里斯·普洛夫、加布·冈萨雷斯和许多其他人,这一切就像昨天一样。令人惊讶的是,许多这样的第一次互动是在20年前,而现在,这些人帮助塑造了这个领域,是我们前进方向的思想领袖。尽管许多年轻的学者看到了今天一个光明而充满活力的销售研究领域,但情况并非总是如此(如上所述可以证明)。我们中的许多人以“战略”或“关系营销”研究员的身份进入这个领域,因为害怕被认为是“销售女孩/家伙”(这个词我听过不止一次,而且不是正面的),害怕被认为是研究潜力有限的人。虽然这在今天看来似乎有些奇怪,但请相信我,人们并不总是以同样的方式看待销售。正如Williams和Plouffe(2007,第417页)20年的内容分析所证明的那样,大量的销售研究被发表,但“在研究期间出现的文章中,JM, JMR和MS发表的文章仅占总数的10%。”听到市场营销学科内外的教师批评这个领域是理论性的或更职业的,这并不罕见。这种情况也延伸到学术课程的研究之外。在过去的几年里,销售课程、项目和中心在美国的大学和学院里蓬勃发展,并在全球范围内变得明显。在20世纪90年代末和21世纪初,只有少数几个以销售为重点的项目。然而,今天,许多销售课程是市场营销部门的支柱和商学院(以及其他领域)的核心。学术研究会议和销售竞赛也是如此。曾经有一段时间,销售研究与关系营销会议结合在一起,没有独立的焦点;而且,只有一个主要的销售竞争和几个较小的区域竞争。现在,这个领域充满了会议和竞赛,可以说,我们已经变得有点分散,现在被迫在这么多可用的选择中分配时间和财力。用类似的时间框架来比较学术事务的状态和该领域的实践状态是很有趣的。在21世纪初,我们听到了去中介化的呼声,以及互联网将使销售人员死亡的说法。我们很快发现,随着互联网和基于crm的技术的出现,销售人员在建立关系方面变得更加重要,而可靠的销售方法至关重要。随着销售的重点越来越多地放在教育目的上,研究领域的销售也受到了关注。虽然负面的刻板印象仍然存在(可能永远存在),但销售人员的职业角色变得更加明显。今天,我们再次听到了对数字营销的担忧和对人工智能取代销售人员的恐惧。然而,我相信我们大多数人都注意到,技术在这个领域变得越突出,销售人员的人情味就变得越重要。根据最近的市场趋势和预测,《美国新闻与世界报道》(2021)表明,新产品和专业产品的增长将导致销售代表的招聘增加。美国劳工统计局(Bureau of Labor Statistics)预计,2021年至2031年间,销售代表的就业人数将增长3.7%。 虽然在实践中有预期的增长,但它不会没有挑战和更高的期望。根据Salesforce.com的销售状况年度报告(2022),销售人员将被期望:(1)通过用更少的资源实现更困难的销售目标来最大化绩效影响,(2)满足不断增长的买家期望,(3)提升
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
36.40%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: As the only scholarly research-based journal in its field, JPSSM seeks to advance both the theory and practice of personal selling and sales management. It provides a forum for the exchange of the latest ideas and findings among educators, researchers, sales executives, trainers, and students. For almost 30 years JPSSM has offered its readers high-quality research and innovative conceptual work that spans an impressive array of topics-motivation, performance, evaluation, team selling, national account management, and more. In addition to feature articles by leaders in the field, the journal offers a widely used selling and sales management abstracts section, drawn from other top marketing journals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信