Development and Validation of the Secondary Transition Fidelity Assessment

IF 1.2 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Allison R. Lombardi, Graham G. Rifenbark, Marcus I. Poppen, Kyle Reardon, Valerie L. Mazzotti, Mary E. Morningstar, D. Rowe, Sheida K. Raley
{"title":"Development and Validation of the Secondary Transition Fidelity Assessment","authors":"Allison R. Lombardi, Graham G. Rifenbark, Marcus I. Poppen, Kyle Reardon, Valerie L. Mazzotti, Mary E. Morningstar, D. Rowe, Sheida K. Raley","doi":"10.1177/15345084211014942","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, we examined the structural validity of the Secondary Transition Fidelity Assessment (STFA), a measure of secondary schools’ use of programs and practices demonstrated by research to lead to meaningful college and career outcomes for all students, including students atrisk for or with disabilities, and students from diverse backgrounds. Drawing from evidence-based practices endorsed by the National Technical Assistance Center for Transition and the Council for Exceptional Children’s Division on Career Development and Transition, the instrument development and refinement process was iterative and involved collecting stakeholder feedback and pilot testing. Responses from a national sample of educators (N = 1,515) were subject to an exploratory factor analysis resulting in five measurable factors: (a) Adolescent Engagement, (b) Inclusive and Tiered Instruction, (c) School-Family Collaboration, (d) District-Community Collaboration, and (e) Professional Capacity. The 5-factor model was subject to a confirmatory factor analysis that resulted in good model fit. Invariance testing on the basis of geographical region strengthened validity evidence and showed a high level of variability with regard to implementing evidence-based transition services. Findings highlight the need for consistent and regular use of a robust, self-assessment fidelity measure of transition service implementation to support all students’ transition to college and career.","PeriodicalId":46264,"journal":{"name":"ASSESSMENT FOR EFFECTIVE INTERVENTION","volume":"47 1","pages":"147 - 156"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/15345084211014942","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASSESSMENT FOR EFFECTIVE INTERVENTION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15345084211014942","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

In this study, we examined the structural validity of the Secondary Transition Fidelity Assessment (STFA), a measure of secondary schools’ use of programs and practices demonstrated by research to lead to meaningful college and career outcomes for all students, including students atrisk for or with disabilities, and students from diverse backgrounds. Drawing from evidence-based practices endorsed by the National Technical Assistance Center for Transition and the Council for Exceptional Children’s Division on Career Development and Transition, the instrument development and refinement process was iterative and involved collecting stakeholder feedback and pilot testing. Responses from a national sample of educators (N = 1,515) were subject to an exploratory factor analysis resulting in five measurable factors: (a) Adolescent Engagement, (b) Inclusive and Tiered Instruction, (c) School-Family Collaboration, (d) District-Community Collaboration, and (e) Professional Capacity. The 5-factor model was subject to a confirmatory factor analysis that resulted in good model fit. Invariance testing on the basis of geographical region strengthened validity evidence and showed a high level of variability with regard to implementing evidence-based transition services. Findings highlight the need for consistent and regular use of a robust, self-assessment fidelity measure of transition service implementation to support all students’ transition to college and career.
二次过渡保真度评估的发展与验证
在这项研究中,我们检验了中学过渡忠诚评估(STFA)的结构有效性,这是一项衡量中学使用研究证明的项目和实践的指标,旨在为所有学生,包括有残疾或有残疾的学生,以及来自不同背景的学生,带来有意义的大学和职业成果。根据国家过渡技术援助中心和特殊儿童委员会职业发展和过渡司认可的循证实践,工具的开发和完善过程是迭代的,涉及收集利益相关者的反馈和试点测试。对来自全国教育工作者样本(N=1515)的回答进行了探索性因素分析,得出了五个可衡量的因素:(a)青少年参与度,(b)包容性和分层教学,(c)学校-家庭合作,(d)地区-社区合作,以及(e)专业能力。对5因子模型进行了验证性因素分析,得出了良好的模型拟合度。基于地理区域的不变检验加强了有效性证据,并显示出在实施循证过渡服务方面的高度可变性。调查结果强调,有必要持续和定期使用强有力的自我评估忠诚度衡量过渡服务的实施,以支持所有学生向大学和职业生涯的过渡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ASSESSMENT FOR EFFECTIVE INTERVENTION
ASSESSMENT FOR EFFECTIVE INTERVENTION EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信