The Looking Machine

IF 0.4 Q3 ANTHROPOLOGY
Lorraine. Mortimer
{"title":"The Looking Machine","authors":"Lorraine. Mortimer","doi":"10.1080/08949468.2021.1984810","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When an early Lumi ere Company film set in French Indochina shows two white European women in the elaborate dress of the Edwardian period throwing coins to local children who busily pick them up, it’s common today to hear that what we are really seeing there is “colonialism at work.” As it stands, that utterance isn’t wrong. The sins of colonialism were and are real. The mistake however is to conclude that this is all that we’re seeing. For if this was indeed a “typical colonial film” those were also two particular women captured in a particular place at a particular time, and real children grabbing at the coins. Many of the Lumi ere films, as David MacDougall says, “are now profoundly moving glimpses of the past, as well as being important historical records” (158 and Fig. 12.1). Part of the attraction of early documentary was watching things that happened in the past as if they were happening in the present. MacDougall notes that an early genre of still photography was a cataloging of petits m etiers—and this attraction in photography with craftspeople, artists and other workers (later including industrial ones), along with people at play, has waxed and waned in different forms right down to the present. Film added a new dimension to such images: “the uncanny emanation of life being lived... the sensation that, like oneself, people elsewhere were experiencing their own lives” (160). Paradoxically, by use of mechanical means, film enabled the possibility of a strange but poignant kinship with others, with other vulnerable and ephemeral human beings and the settings they lived in—scenes that have long since passed. We might wonder about the individual fates of those children in Indochina, but we do know that they are dead. A kind of “spiritual wound” could be opened by film, a “new intimacy” that was both “painful and fascinating.” This existential/magical dimension of film and our experience of it was something written about by diverse poets, novelists and other artists, and is still alive today in the best of writing on film. But in documentary it would soon be “softened and contained, by a system of quotation,” MacDougall observes. Documentary films would begin to treat images “not as scenes of actual events but as cinematic illustrations of them.” They would retreat from the present moment and begin approaching their subjects in “increasingly","PeriodicalId":44055,"journal":{"name":"Visual Anthropology","volume":"34 1","pages":"454 - 464"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Visual Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08949468.2021.1984810","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When an early Lumi ere Company film set in French Indochina shows two white European women in the elaborate dress of the Edwardian period throwing coins to local children who busily pick them up, it’s common today to hear that what we are really seeing there is “colonialism at work.” As it stands, that utterance isn’t wrong. The sins of colonialism were and are real. The mistake however is to conclude that this is all that we’re seeing. For if this was indeed a “typical colonial film” those were also two particular women captured in a particular place at a particular time, and real children grabbing at the coins. Many of the Lumi ere films, as David MacDougall says, “are now profoundly moving glimpses of the past, as well as being important historical records” (158 and Fig. 12.1). Part of the attraction of early documentary was watching things that happened in the past as if they were happening in the present. MacDougall notes that an early genre of still photography was a cataloging of petits m etiers—and this attraction in photography with craftspeople, artists and other workers (later including industrial ones), along with people at play, has waxed and waned in different forms right down to the present. Film added a new dimension to such images: “the uncanny emanation of life being lived... the sensation that, like oneself, people elsewhere were experiencing their own lives” (160). Paradoxically, by use of mechanical means, film enabled the possibility of a strange but poignant kinship with others, with other vulnerable and ephemeral human beings and the settings they lived in—scenes that have long since passed. We might wonder about the individual fates of those children in Indochina, but we do know that they are dead. A kind of “spiritual wound” could be opened by film, a “new intimacy” that was both “painful and fascinating.” This existential/magical dimension of film and our experience of it was something written about by diverse poets, novelists and other artists, and is still alive today in the best of writing on film. But in documentary it would soon be “softened and contained, by a system of quotation,” MacDougall observes. Documentary films would begin to treat images “not as scenes of actual events but as cinematic illustrations of them.” They would retreat from the present moment and begin approaching their subjects in “increasingly
看机器
Lumi ere公司早期的一部以法国中印为背景的电影显示,两名欧洲白人女性穿着爱德华时代精心设计的衣服,向忙于取硬币的当地儿童扔硬币。今天,我们经常听到我们真正看到的是“殖民主义在起作用”。就目前情况来看,这种说法没有错。殖民主义的罪恶过去和现在都是真实的。然而,错误的是得出这样的结论:这就是我们所看到的一切。因为如果这真的是一部“典型的殖民电影”,那也是两个特定的女人在特定的时间在特定的地方被抓获,还有真正的孩子在抓硬币。正如David MacDougall所说,许多Lumi ere电影“现在都是对过去的深刻感人的一瞥,也是重要的历史记录”(158和图12.1)。早期纪录片的部分吸引力在于观看过去发生的事情,就好像它们发生在现在一样。MacDougall指出,早期的静态摄影类型是对小时代的编目,而这种对手工艺者、艺术家和其他工人(后来包括工业工人)以及游戏中的人的摄影吸引力,一直以不同的形式发展和减弱,直到现在。这部电影为这些图像增加了一个新的维度:“生活的神秘散发……感觉就像你自己一样,其他地方的人也在经历自己的生活”(160)。矛盾的是,通过使用机械手段,电影使人们有可能与他人、与其他脆弱而短暂的人类以及他们所生活的环境建立一种奇怪但辛酸的亲缘关系——这些场景早已过去。我们可能想知道中印那些孩子的命运,但我们知道他们已经死了。电影可以打开一种“精神创伤”,一种“痛苦而迷人”的“新亲密感”。电影的这种存在/神奇的维度以及我们对它的体验是由不同的诗人、小说家和其他艺术家所写的,并且在今天仍以最好的电影写作方式存在。但在纪录片中,它很快就会“被一种引用体系软化和包容”,MacDougall观察到。纪录片开始将图像“不是实际事件的场景,而是它们的电影插图”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Visual Anthropology
Visual Anthropology ANTHROPOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
50.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Visual Anthropology is a scholarly journal presenting original articles, commentary, discussions, film reviews, and book reviews on anthropological and ethnographic topics. The journal focuses on the study of human behavior through visual means. Experts in the field also examine visual symbolic forms from a cultural-historical framework and provide a cross-cultural study of art and artifacts. Visual Anthropology also promotes the study, use, and production of anthropological and ethnographic films, videos, and photographs for research and teaching.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信