AN APOLOGIA FOR ARTHUR LOVEJOY'S LONG-RANGE APPROACH TO THE HISTORY OF IDEAS

IF 1.1 2区历史学 Q1 HISTORY

History and Theory Pub Date : 2023-04-17 DOI:10.1111/hith.12298

Nico Mouton

引用次数: 1

Abstract

Arthur Lovejoy's long-range approach to the history of ideas is little appreciated and largely abandoned. The list of Lovejoy's supposed sins is long. His critics have charged that, among other things, he treated ideas as timeless entities with essences that are independent of individual thinkers, separate from specific texts, isolated from immediate contexts, and insulated from intellectual change. This article defends Lovejoy against such attacks and argues that his approach is still viable and valuable.

查看原文本刊更多论文

为阿瑟·洛夫乔伊对思想史的长期探索而道歉

阿瑟·洛夫乔伊对思想史的长期研究很少受到赞赏，而且大部分被抛弃了。洛夫乔伊的罪行有很多。他的批评者指责说，除其他外，他将思想视为具有本质的永恒实体，独立于个人思想家，与特定文本分离，与直接背景隔离，与知识变化隔离。本文为洛夫乔伊辩护，反对这种攻击，并认为他的方法仍然是可行的和有价值的。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

History and Theory Multiple-

CiteScore

2.00

自引率

9.10%

发文量

期刊介绍： History and Theory leads the way in exploring the nature of history. Prominent international thinkers contribute their reflections in the following areas: critical philosophy of history, speculative philosophy of history, historiography, history of historiography, historical methodology, critical theory, and time and culture. Related disciplines are also covered within the journal, including interactions between history and the natural and social sciences, the humanities, and psychology.