Sensemaking in a Networked World: COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in Turkey

IF 1.4 Q2 COMMUNICATION
Gamze Yılmaz, Mehmet Bilen
{"title":"Sensemaking in a Networked World: COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in Turkey","authors":"Gamze Yılmaz, Mehmet Bilen","doi":"10.1080/10510974.2022.2097285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study aims to understand the collective sensemaking efforts and emotional reactions to the COVID-19 vaccine in Turkey between January 13, and January 22, 2021, as this time frame captured the initial days of vaccine rollouts and was characterized by high information ambiguity regarding COVID-19 vaccinations in Turkey. 45,759 tweets (written in Turkish) related to COVID-19 vaccine were analyzed. To analyze the tweet corpus, we used Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) topic modeling with a total of 30 topics based on the coherence scores, which were grouped into 6 distinct themes. The findings showed that Twitter users in Turkey made sense of the initial uncertainty regarding vaccinations by 1) discussing their vaccine hesitancy and rejection, 2) critiquing vaccine availability and priority groups, 3) critiquing the politicians getting vaccinated under the disguise of “incentivizing” the society 4) mocking photo sharing during vaccinations, 5) sharing unverified information about vaccination status and side effects 6) telling jokes about the vaccinations and vaccine side effects. Additionally, the sentiment analysis showed that the dominant emotions around the COVID-19 vaccine were negative. Theoretical implications are advanced for collective sensemaking framework, and practical implications are outlined to improve global communication efforts to eradicate vaccine hesitancy.","PeriodicalId":47080,"journal":{"name":"Communication Studies","volume":"73 1","pages":"347 - 363"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communication Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2022.2097285","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study aims to understand the collective sensemaking efforts and emotional reactions to the COVID-19 vaccine in Turkey between January 13, and January 22, 2021, as this time frame captured the initial days of vaccine rollouts and was characterized by high information ambiguity regarding COVID-19 vaccinations in Turkey. 45,759 tweets (written in Turkish) related to COVID-19 vaccine were analyzed. To analyze the tweet corpus, we used Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) topic modeling with a total of 30 topics based on the coherence scores, which were grouped into 6 distinct themes. The findings showed that Twitter users in Turkey made sense of the initial uncertainty regarding vaccinations by 1) discussing their vaccine hesitancy and rejection, 2) critiquing vaccine availability and priority groups, 3) critiquing the politicians getting vaccinated under the disguise of “incentivizing” the society 4) mocking photo sharing during vaccinations, 5) sharing unverified information about vaccination status and side effects 6) telling jokes about the vaccinations and vaccine side effects. Additionally, the sentiment analysis showed that the dominant emotions around the COVID-19 vaccine were negative. Theoretical implications are advanced for collective sensemaking framework, and practical implications are outlined to improve global communication efforts to eradicate vaccine hesitancy.
网络世界中的意义构建:土耳其对COVID-19疫苗的犹豫
本研究旨在了解2021年1月13日至1月22日期间土耳其对COVID-19疫苗的集体意义构建努力和情绪反应,因为这一时间框架捕获了疫苗推广的最初几天,并且土耳其COVID-19疫苗接种的信息高度模糊。分析了45,759条与COVID-19疫苗相关的推文(用土耳其语撰写)。为了分析推文语料库,我们使用潜狄利克雷分配(Latent Dirichlet Allocation, LDA)主题建模,基于连贯性得分将30个主题分为6个不同的主题。调查结果显示,土耳其的Twitter用户通过以下方式理解了最初对疫苗接种的不确定性:1)讨论他们对疫苗的犹豫和拒绝,2)批评疫苗的可用性和优先群体,3)批评政客以“激励”社会为幌子接种疫苗,4)嘲笑疫苗接种期间的照片分享,5)分享关于疫苗接种情况和副作用的未经证实的信息6)讲关于疫苗接种和疫苗副作用的笑话。此外,情绪分析显示,围绕新冠病毒疫苗的主导情绪是消极的。提出了对集体意义制定框架的理论意义,并概述了改善全球沟通努力以消除疫苗犹豫的实际意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Communication Studies
Communication Studies COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
6.20%
发文量
26
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信