The Fruits without the Roots? Postmodern Group-Identity in the Light of Biblical Anthropology

IF 0.4 0 RELIGION
Jaap Doedens
{"title":"The Fruits without the Roots? Postmodern Group-Identity in the Light of Biblical Anthropology","authors":"Jaap Doedens","doi":"10.31743/biban.13184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":" \nThe origins of modern western societies are indubitably rooted in Judeo-Christian values that generated a unique form of civilization over the course of almost two-thousand years. These values have as their core-belief that humans are created in the image of God. This notion deeply influenced views on human identity and on human rights. Since the rise of modernity, these religious roots of the western world-view have eroded gradually as a consequence of secularization. While society increasingly became cut off from its own roots, the fruits of the former world-view were still accepted as desirable. Howev­er, emerging post-modernity appears to be in the process of not only losing the roots, but also rejecting the fruits of Judeo-Christian values. As a consequence, human identity is evermore perceived as consisting of – often conflicting – group-identities. The aim of this study is to discover whether biblical anthropology can shed light on the functions of groups within a given society. Being aware of the fact that the way how ancient Israel dealt with minority groups and how this is reflected within the Hebrew Bible is not auto­matically applicable for present-day societies, we still might be able to glean insights for our present world. In order to attain such, this study first analyzes shortly the post-modern societal situation pertaining to group-identities. Subsequently, the focus will be on how Israel’s self-understanding as “chosen people” is approached critically by some parts within the Old Testament. Following that, the study concentrates on how concrete social and religious minority groups were viewed: the sojourners, the poor, the slaves. Within this approach also the “sons of the prophets” and the Rechabites will be reviewed. The study suggests that the Christian church might have an own alternative narrative within a postmodern world by emphasizing that identity should have a transcendent side, by seeing that the individual is the proper level of identity, and by proclaiming that individuals are called to function with responsibility within communities.","PeriodicalId":52162,"journal":{"name":"Biblical Annals","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biblical Annals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31743/biban.13184","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

  The origins of modern western societies are indubitably rooted in Judeo-Christian values that generated a unique form of civilization over the course of almost two-thousand years. These values have as their core-belief that humans are created in the image of God. This notion deeply influenced views on human identity and on human rights. Since the rise of modernity, these religious roots of the western world-view have eroded gradually as a consequence of secularization. While society increasingly became cut off from its own roots, the fruits of the former world-view were still accepted as desirable. Howev­er, emerging post-modernity appears to be in the process of not only losing the roots, but also rejecting the fruits of Judeo-Christian values. As a consequence, human identity is evermore perceived as consisting of – often conflicting – group-identities. The aim of this study is to discover whether biblical anthropology can shed light on the functions of groups within a given society. Being aware of the fact that the way how ancient Israel dealt with minority groups and how this is reflected within the Hebrew Bible is not auto­matically applicable for present-day societies, we still might be able to glean insights for our present world. In order to attain such, this study first analyzes shortly the post-modern societal situation pertaining to group-identities. Subsequently, the focus will be on how Israel’s self-understanding as “chosen people” is approached critically by some parts within the Old Testament. Following that, the study concentrates on how concrete social and religious minority groups were viewed: the sojourners, the poor, the slaves. Within this approach also the “sons of the prophets” and the Rechabites will be reviewed. The study suggests that the Christian church might have an own alternative narrative within a postmodern world by emphasizing that identity should have a transcendent side, by seeing that the individual is the proper level of identity, and by proclaiming that individuals are called to function with responsibility within communities.
没有根的果实?圣经人类学视野下的后现代群体认同
现代西方社会的起源无疑植根于犹太-基督教的价值观,这些价值观在近两千年的时间里形成了一种独特的文明形式。这些价值观的核心信念是,人类是按照上帝的形象创造的。这一概念深刻影响了关于人的特性和人权的观点。自现代性兴起以来,西方世界观的这些宗教根源由于世俗化而逐渐被侵蚀。尽管社会越来越与自己的根源隔绝,但前世界观的成果仍然被认为是可取的。然而,新兴的后现代性似乎不仅在失去根源,而且在拒绝犹太-基督教价值观的果实。因此,人类身份越来越被认为是由群体身份组成的,往往是相互冲突的。本研究的目的是发现圣经人类学是否能够揭示特定社会中群体的功能。意识到古代以色列对待少数群体的方式以及这一点在《希伯来圣经》中的反映并不自动适用于当今社会,我们仍然可以为我们的当今世界收集见解。为了做到这一点,本研究首先简要分析了与群体身份相关的后现代社会状况。随后,重点将放在《旧约》中的一些部分如何批判性地对待以色列作为“被选中的人”的自我理解。在此之后,研究集中于如何看待具体的社会和宗教少数群体:旅居者、穷人、奴隶。在这种方法中,“先知之子”和Rechabites也将被审查。这项研究表明,在后现代世界中,基督教会可能有自己的另类叙事,强调身份应该有超越的一面,看到个人是正确的身份层次,并宣布个人被要求在社区中承担责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biblical Annals
Biblical Annals Arts and Humanities-Religious Studies
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书