ANALISIS FRAUD DIAMOND UNTUK MENDETEKSI TERJADINYA FINANCIAL STATEMENT FRAUD DI PERUSAHAAN (STUDI EMPIRIS PADA PERUSAHAAN MANUFAKTUR YANG TERDAFTAR DI BEI TAHUN 2012-2015)

Lutfiana Oktarigusta, S. Triyono
{"title":"ANALISIS FRAUD DIAMOND UNTUK MENDETEKSI TERJADINYA FINANCIAL STATEMENT FRAUD DI PERUSAHAAN (STUDI EMPIRIS PADA PERUSAHAAN MANUFAKTUR YANG TERDAFTAR DI BEI TAHUN 2012-2015)","authors":"Lutfiana Oktarigusta, S. Triyono","doi":"10.23917/dayasaing.v19i2.5384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to analyze the influence of the four elements in Fraud Diamond to detect possible Financial Statement Fraud. Fraud diamond consists of pressure element, opportunity, rationalization and capability. The fourth element is to be divided into seven variables: financial stability by proxy assets changes (ACHANGE), financial presure by proxy Return on Assets (ROA), external presure by proxy Leverage (LEV), the nature of  industry by proxy Receivable (REC), effectiveness supervision by proxy the number of independent directors (BDOUT), rationalization of the proxy Total acrual to Total Assets (TATA), and the capability to proxy the change of directors (DCHANGE) to detect possible financial statements fraud as measured by M Score models. This study use  purposive sampling to select a representative sample. This reseach use periode 2011-2015 as an abservation periode. The collected data is analized using logistic regresion. This study show that there are two (2) variables: the effectiveness of supervision by the proxy of the number of independent commissioners (BDOUT) and rationalization by proxy Total acrual to Total Assets (TATA) that significantly influence the possibility of financial statements fraud. While five other variable whitch consists of financial stability, financial presure, external presure, nature of industry, and the capability do not have significantin influent on financial statements fraud.","PeriodicalId":31835,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Manajemen Dayasaing","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Manajemen Dayasaing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23917/dayasaing.v19i2.5384","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze the influence of the four elements in Fraud Diamond to detect possible Financial Statement Fraud. Fraud diamond consists of pressure element, opportunity, rationalization and capability. The fourth element is to be divided into seven variables: financial stability by proxy assets changes (ACHANGE), financial presure by proxy Return on Assets (ROA), external presure by proxy Leverage (LEV), the nature of  industry by proxy Receivable (REC), effectiveness supervision by proxy the number of independent directors (BDOUT), rationalization of the proxy Total acrual to Total Assets (TATA), and the capability to proxy the change of directors (DCHANGE) to detect possible financial statements fraud as measured by M Score models. This study use  purposive sampling to select a representative sample. This reseach use periode 2011-2015 as an abservation periode. The collected data is analized using logistic regresion. This study show that there are two (2) variables: the effectiveness of supervision by the proxy of the number of independent commissioners (BDOUT) and rationalization by proxy Total acrual to Total Assets (TATA) that significantly influence the possibility of financial statements fraud. While five other variable whitch consists of financial stability, financial presure, external presure, nature of industry, and the capability do not have significantin influent on financial statements fraud.
财务自由报表在工作中的检测自由度分析
本研究旨在分析舞弊钻石中四个要素的影响,以发现可能的财务报表舞弊。欺诈钻石由压力因素、机会因素、合理化因素和能力因素组成。第四个要素分为七个变量:通过代理资产变动来衡量财务稳定性(change)、通过代理资产收益率(ROA)来衡量财务压力(ROA)、通过代理杠杆(LEV)来衡量外部压力(LEV)、通过代理应收账款来衡量行业性质(REC)、通过代理独立董事人数来衡量有效性监督(BDOUT)、通过代理总应计资产对总资产的合理化(TATA)以及通过代理董事变动来检测可能存在的财务报表欺诈的能力(DCHANGE)。本研究采用有目的抽样的方法,选取具有代表性的样本。本研究以2011-2015年为观察期。对收集到的数据进行逻辑回归分析。本研究表明,独立专员人数代理监管的有效性(BDOUT)和代理总应计资产与总资产比率(TATA)这两个变量显著影响财务报表舞弊的可能性。而财务稳定性、财务压力、外部压力、行业性质、能力等五个变量对财务报表舞弊的影响不显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
17 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信