Définir ou détecter des pathologies ? Utilisation et interprétation des scores seuils à la lumière du débat dimensions/catégories

IF 0.6 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY
M. Aguert , A. Capel , A. Mortier
{"title":"Définir ou détecter des pathologies ? Utilisation et interprétation des scores seuils à la lumière du débat dimensions/catégories","authors":"M. Aguert ,&nbsp;A. Capel ,&nbsp;A. Mortier","doi":"10.1016/j.prps.2022.10.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A number of psychometric tests are aimed at locating the performance of an individual along a continuous range that goes from normal to worrying. In a different paradigm, there are tests whose goal is to assess whether or not an individual is healthy with respect to a psychological, psychiatric or neurological pathology that is defined independently from the test itself. The former rely on a dimensional concept of psychopathologies; the latter imply a categorical concept. The former require to compare the performance of the individual to a standard sample that is representative of the general population; the latter involve a standard sample representative of the healthy population only. The former might imply the use of a cut-off score to indicate that a certain degree of rarity of the performance has been reached, while the latter must involve a cut-off score to make a decision (whether the individual belongs to the “healthy” or “pathological” category), a score that is most often set so as to control the false-positive rate in making this decision. In the former paradigm, the cut-off score defines or contributes to define the pathology. In the latter, it only helps detecting it. This article aims at making clear the difference between these two realms and highlight their practical as well as theoretical impact on psychological practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54590,"journal":{"name":"Pratiques Psychologiques","volume":"29 1","pages":"Pages 1-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pratiques Psychologiques","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1269176322000633","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A number of psychometric tests are aimed at locating the performance of an individual along a continuous range that goes from normal to worrying. In a different paradigm, there are tests whose goal is to assess whether or not an individual is healthy with respect to a psychological, psychiatric or neurological pathology that is defined independently from the test itself. The former rely on a dimensional concept of psychopathologies; the latter imply a categorical concept. The former require to compare the performance of the individual to a standard sample that is representative of the general population; the latter involve a standard sample representative of the healthy population only. The former might imply the use of a cut-off score to indicate that a certain degree of rarity of the performance has been reached, while the latter must involve a cut-off score to make a decision (whether the individual belongs to the “healthy” or “pathological” category), a score that is most often set so as to control the false-positive rate in making this decision. In the former paradigm, the cut-off score defines or contributes to define the pathology. In the latter, it only helps detecting it. This article aims at making clear the difference between these two realms and highlight their practical as well as theoretical impact on psychological practice.

定义或检测病理学?根据维度/类别辩论使用和解释阈值分数
许多心理测试的目的是在从正常到担忧的连续范围内定位个人的表现。在一个不同的范例中,有一些测试的目标是评估一个人在心理、精神或神经病理学方面是否健康,这些病理学的定义与测试本身无关。前者依赖于精神病理学的维度概念;后者意味着一个分类概念。前者需要将个人的表现与代表一般人群的标准样本进行比较;后者只涉及代表健康人口的标准样本。前者可能意味着使用一个截止分数来表明已经达到了某种程度的罕见表现,而后者必须涉及一个截止分数来做出决定(个人是属于“健康”还是“病理”类别),这个分数通常是为了控制做出这一决定的假阳性率而设定的。在前一种范式中,临界值定义或有助于定义病理。在后一种情况下,它只能帮助检测它。本文旨在明确这两个领域的区别,并强调它们对心理实践的实践和理论影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
81 days
期刊介绍: Pratiques psychologiques is an official publication of the ''Société française de psychologie''. It publishes thematic issues, and concentrates on the applications in the psychological practice. It covers all fields of psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信