There Has Never Been A 'Timber War'

G. King
{"title":"There Has Never Been A 'Timber War'","authors":"G. King","doi":"10.55671/0160-4341.1070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"here has never been a ‘Timber War’ in California. Rather, in the redwoods there has been an ongoing onesided assault against the forest, and against activists who, in modern times, have risked their liberty and their lives in large part to enforce state and federal laws. This essay is an attempt to demystify the history of this assault and the citizenry’s response to it. To start, it’s important to keep in mind that crimes against activists and public trust resources (water, wildlife, fisheries) have almost always been treated with indifference, or complicity, in California by police agencies, elected officials, and regulators. Beginning in the mid-1980s, violence against activists was regarded as inconsequential, even desirable. Perpetrators of violence enjoyed an unspoken impunity that environmentalists could never hope to achieve. For a war you have to have violence on both sides. This was no war. When someone detonated a pipe bomb under the driver’s seat of Judi Bari’s car in 1990, severely injuring her and Darryl Cherney, rather than investigate the attack the FBI and Oakland Police arrested the pair for ‘transporting’ the bomb. The police agencies would later lose a $4.4 million lawsuit against the pair for violating their constitutional rights. A few months earlier, when Bari reported to the Mendocino County Board of Supervisors that she had received dozens of death threats, including the latest, an illustration of a riflescope superimposed over her face, Supervisor Marilyn Butcher said, “You brought it on yourself, Judi.” A few months before that, Judi’s car was rammed from behind by the same logging truck she had blockaded the previous day. Her young daughters were in the backseat. The car was totaled. When she reported the attack to the Mendocino County Sheriff’s office a deputy told her, “If you turn up dead then we’ll investigate.”","PeriodicalId":84867,"journal":{"name":"Humboldt journal of social relations","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Humboldt journal of social relations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55671/0160-4341.1070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

here has never been a ‘Timber War’ in California. Rather, in the redwoods there has been an ongoing onesided assault against the forest, and against activists who, in modern times, have risked their liberty and their lives in large part to enforce state and federal laws. This essay is an attempt to demystify the history of this assault and the citizenry’s response to it. To start, it’s important to keep in mind that crimes against activists and public trust resources (water, wildlife, fisheries) have almost always been treated with indifference, or complicity, in California by police agencies, elected officials, and regulators. Beginning in the mid-1980s, violence against activists was regarded as inconsequential, even desirable. Perpetrators of violence enjoyed an unspoken impunity that environmentalists could never hope to achieve. For a war you have to have violence on both sides. This was no war. When someone detonated a pipe bomb under the driver’s seat of Judi Bari’s car in 1990, severely injuring her and Darryl Cherney, rather than investigate the attack the FBI and Oakland Police arrested the pair for ‘transporting’ the bomb. The police agencies would later lose a $4.4 million lawsuit against the pair for violating their constitutional rights. A few months earlier, when Bari reported to the Mendocino County Board of Supervisors that she had received dozens of death threats, including the latest, an illustration of a riflescope superimposed over her face, Supervisor Marilyn Butcher said, “You brought it on yourself, Judi.” A few months before that, Judi’s car was rammed from behind by the same logging truck she had blockaded the previous day. Her young daughters were in the backseat. The car was totaled. When she reported the attack to the Mendocino County Sheriff’s office a deputy told her, “If you turn up dead then we’ll investigate.”
从来没有“木材战争”
加州从未发生过“木材战争”。相反,在红木中,人们一直在对森林和活动人士进行单方面的攻击,这些活动人士在现代冒着自由和生命危险,在很大程度上执行州和联邦法律。这篇文章试图揭开这起袭击事件的历史以及公民对此的反应。首先,重要的是要记住,在加利福尼亚州,警察机构、民选官员和监管机构几乎总是对针对活动家和公共信任资源(水、野生动物、渔业)的犯罪漠不关心或共谋。从20世纪80年代中期开始,针对活动人士的暴力行为被认为是无关紧要的,甚至是可取的。暴力犯罪者享有一种不言而喻的有罪不罚现象,这是环保主义者永远无法实现的。对于一场战争来说,双方都必须有暴力。这不是战争。1990年,有人在朱迪·巴里的汽车驾驶座下引爆了一枚管状炸弹,严重伤害了她和达里尔·切尔尼,联邦调查局和奥克兰警方没有调查这次袭击,而是以“运输”炸弹的罪名逮捕了这两人。随后,警察机构将在针对这两人侵犯宪法权利的440万美元诉讼中败诉。几个月前,巴里向门多西诺县监事会报告称,她收到了数十份死亡威胁,其中包括最近一份叠加在她脸上的步枪镜插图,监事玛丽莲·布彻说:“朱迪,这是你自己造成的。”,朱迪的车被她前一天封锁的那辆伐木卡车从后面撞了过去。她的小女儿坐在后座上。汽车报废了。当她向门多西诺县警长办公室报告袭击事件时,一名副手告诉她:“如果你死了,我们会进行调查。”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信