Hyperintensity at fat spared area in steatotic liver on the hepatobiliary phase MRI.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine
E. Ünal, I. Idilman, A. Karaosmanoğlu, M. Özmen, D. Akata, M. Karçaaltıncaba
{"title":"Hyperintensity at fat spared area in steatotic liver on the hepatobiliary phase MRI.","authors":"E. Ünal, I. Idilman, A. Karaosmanoğlu, M. Özmen, D. Akata, M. Karçaaltıncaba","doi":"10.5152/DIR.2019.18535","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE\nWe aimed to investigate the reasons for hyperintensity at fat spared area in steatotic liver at hepatobiliary phase (HBP) on gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA) enhanced liver magnetic resonance imaging.\n\n\nMETHODS\nTwenty-two patients with focal fat spared area demonstrating hyperintensity on HBP images were included. A region of interest was placed on in- and opposed-phase images at fat spared area and liver to measure the fat. The measurement was also performed on precontrast T1-weighted and HBP images. The signal intensities of spleen, kidney, muscle, intervertebral disc, and spinal cord were also recorded.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThe mean fat fraction of liver and fat spared area was 24.86% (8%-46%) and 8.41% (1%-34%), respectively (P < 0.001). There was a significant positive correlation between liver parenchyma fat fraction and delta fat fraction (r=0.74, P < 0.001). The mean signal intensity values of fat spared areas were higher compared with liver on precontrast T1-weighted and HBP images (P < 0.001). The mean relative enhancement ratio of liver and fat spared areas were 0.98 (0.05-1.90) and 1.15 (0.22-2.03), respectively (P < 0.001). However, in 6 patients, the relative enhancement ratio of liver and fat spared areas were almost equal. The uptake of Gd-EOB at fat spared area was not correlated with the degree of steatosis (r = -0.01, P = 0.95).\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nFat spared area in steatotic liver appears hyperintense on HBP images due to increased relative enhancement ratio and/or baseline hyperintensity on precontrast images.","PeriodicalId":50582,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5152/DIR.2019.18535","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/DIR.2019.18535","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

PURPOSE We aimed to investigate the reasons for hyperintensity at fat spared area in steatotic liver at hepatobiliary phase (HBP) on gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA) enhanced liver magnetic resonance imaging. METHODS Twenty-two patients with focal fat spared area demonstrating hyperintensity on HBP images were included. A region of interest was placed on in- and opposed-phase images at fat spared area and liver to measure the fat. The measurement was also performed on precontrast T1-weighted and HBP images. The signal intensities of spleen, kidney, muscle, intervertebral disc, and spinal cord were also recorded. RESULTS The mean fat fraction of liver and fat spared area was 24.86% (8%-46%) and 8.41% (1%-34%), respectively (P < 0.001). There was a significant positive correlation between liver parenchyma fat fraction and delta fat fraction (r=0.74, P < 0.001). The mean signal intensity values of fat spared areas were higher compared with liver on precontrast T1-weighted and HBP images (P < 0.001). The mean relative enhancement ratio of liver and fat spared areas were 0.98 (0.05-1.90) and 1.15 (0.22-2.03), respectively (P < 0.001). However, in 6 patients, the relative enhancement ratio of liver and fat spared areas were almost equal. The uptake of Gd-EOB at fat spared area was not correlated with the degree of steatosis (r = -0.01, P = 0.95). CONCLUSION Fat spared area in steatotic liver appears hyperintense on HBP images due to increased relative enhancement ratio and/or baseline hyperintensity on precontrast images.
肝胆相MRI显示脂肪变性肝脂肪保留区高强度。
目的探讨钆-乙氧基苄基-二乙烯三胺五乙酸(Gd-EOB-DTPA)增强肝磁共振成像在肝胆期脂肪变性肝(HBP)脂肪保留区出现高信号的原因。方法选取22例HBP图像显示高强度的局灶性脂肪区患者。在脂肪保留区和肝脏的正反相图像上放置一个感兴趣的区域来测量脂肪。测量也进行了预对比t1加权和HBP图像。同时记录脾脏、肾脏、肌肉、椎间盘和脊髓的信号强度。结果肝脏脂肪含量平均为24.86%(8% ~ 46%),脂肪备用面积平均为8.41% (1% ~ 34%)(P < 0.001)。肝实质脂肪分数与δ脂肪分数呈显著正相关(r=0.74, P < 0.001)。对比前t1加权和HBP图像,脂肪备用区平均信号强度值高于肝脏(P < 0.001)。肝脏和脂肪备用区平均相对增强比分别为0.98(0.05 ~ 1.90)和1.15 (0.22 ~ 2.03)(P < 0.001)。但6例患者肝脏与脂肪备用区相对增强比例几乎相等。脂肪备用区Gd-EOB摄取与脂肪变性程度无相关性(r = -0.01, P = 0.95)。结论脂肪变性肝的脂肪备用区在HBP图像上呈现高信号,这是由于相对增强比的增加和/或对比前图像的基线高信号。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
69
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (Diagn Interv Radiol) is the open access, online-only official publication of Turkish Society of Radiology. It is published bimonthly and the journal’s publication language is English. The journal is a medium for original articles, reviews, pictorial essays, technical notes related to all fields of diagnostic and interventional radiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信