{"title":"Green buildings and maintenance planning practices in Malaysia","authors":"Z. Ismail","doi":"10.1108/jeim-05-2022-0168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeGreen building (GB) maintenance is increasingly accepted in the construction industry, so it can now be interpreted as an industry best practice for maintenance planning. However, the performance competency and design knowledge of the practice's building control instrument process can be affected by its evaluation and the information management of building information modelling (BIM)–based model checking (BMC). These maintenance-planning problems have not yet been investigated in instances such as the Grenfell Tower fire (14 June 2017, approximately 80 fatalities) in North Kensington, West London.Design/methodology/approachThis study proposes a theoretical framework for analysing the existing conceptualisation of BIM tools and techniques based on a critical review of GB maintenance environments. These are currently employed on GB maintenance ecosystems embedded in project teams that can affect BMC practices in the automation system process. In order to better understand how BMC is implemented in GB ecosystem projects, a quantitative case study is conducted in the Malaysian public works department (Jabatan Kerja Raya (JKR)).FindingsGB ecosystem projects were not as effective as planned due to safety awareness, design planning, inadequate track insulation, environmental (in) compatibility and inadequate building access management. Descriptive statistics and an ANOVA were applied to analyse the data. The study is reinforced by a process flow, which is transformed into a theoretical framework.Originality/valueIndustry practitioners can use the developed framework to diagnose BMC application issues and leverage the staff competency inherent in an ecosystem to plan GB maintenance environments successfully.","PeriodicalId":47889,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Enterprise Information Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Enterprise Information Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jeim-05-2022-0168","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
PurposeGreen building (GB) maintenance is increasingly accepted in the construction industry, so it can now be interpreted as an industry best practice for maintenance planning. However, the performance competency and design knowledge of the practice's building control instrument process can be affected by its evaluation and the information management of building information modelling (BIM)–based model checking (BMC). These maintenance-planning problems have not yet been investigated in instances such as the Grenfell Tower fire (14 June 2017, approximately 80 fatalities) in North Kensington, West London.Design/methodology/approachThis study proposes a theoretical framework for analysing the existing conceptualisation of BIM tools and techniques based on a critical review of GB maintenance environments. These are currently employed on GB maintenance ecosystems embedded in project teams that can affect BMC practices in the automation system process. In order to better understand how BMC is implemented in GB ecosystem projects, a quantitative case study is conducted in the Malaysian public works department (Jabatan Kerja Raya (JKR)).FindingsGB ecosystem projects were not as effective as planned due to safety awareness, design planning, inadequate track insulation, environmental (in) compatibility and inadequate building access management. Descriptive statistics and an ANOVA were applied to analyse the data. The study is reinforced by a process flow, which is transformed into a theoretical framework.Originality/valueIndustry practitioners can use the developed framework to diagnose BMC application issues and leverage the staff competency inherent in an ecosystem to plan GB maintenance environments successfully.
绿色建筑(GB)维护越来越被建筑业所接受,因此它现在可以被解释为维护计划的行业最佳实践。然而,建筑控制仪表过程的绩效能力和设计知识会受到其评估和基于建筑信息模型(BIM)的模型检查(BMC)的信息管理的影响。在西伦敦北肯辛顿的格伦费尔大厦火灾(2017年6月14日,约80人死亡)等事件中,这些维护规划问题尚未得到调查。设计/方法/方法本研究提出了一个理论框架,用于分析基于GB维护环境的BIM工具和技术的现有概念化。目前,项目团队中嵌入的GB维护生态系统可以影响自动化系统过程中的BMC实践。为了更好地了解BMC如何在GB生态系统项目中实施,在马来西亚公共工程部(Jabatan Kerja Raya (JKR))进行了定量案例研究。发现由于安全意识、设计规划、轨道绝缘、环境兼容性和建筑通道管理不足,gb生态系统项目效果不如计划。采用描述性统计和方差分析对数据进行分析。该研究通过一个过程流程来加强,并将其转化为理论框架。独创性/价值行业从业者可以使用开发的框架来诊断BMC应用程序问题,并利用生态系统中固有的员工能力来成功地规划GB维护环境。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Enterprise Information Management (JEIM) is a significant contributor to the normative literature, offering both conceptual and practical insights supported by innovative discoveries that enrich the existing body of knowledge.
Within its pages, JEIM presents research findings sourced from globally renowned experts. These contributions encompass scholarly examinations of cutting-edge theories and practices originating from leading research institutions. Additionally, the journal features inputs from senior business executives and consultants, who share their insights gleaned from specific enterprise case studies. Through these reports, readers benefit from a comparative analysis of different environmental contexts, facilitating valuable learning experiences.
JEIM's distinctive blend of theoretical analysis and practical application fosters comprehensive discussions on commercial discoveries. This approach enhances the audience's comprehension of contemporary, applied, and rigorous information management practices, which extend across entire enterprises and their intricate supply chains.