PERBANDINGAN HASIL BELAJAR STATISTIK DASAR DENGAN METODE PRAKTIKUM

Yn Yeti Nurizzati
{"title":"PERBANDINGAN HASIL BELAJAR STATISTIK DASAR DENGAN METODE PRAKTIKUM","authors":"Yn Yeti Nurizzati","doi":"10.22236/KALAMATIKA.vol2no2.2017pp105-116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Tadris English Department 2015/2016 consists of 4 classes, but only 2 classes (C and D) using the practicum method in Basic Statistics learning. Class C and D Department of Tadris English has different characteristics. Class C is more preferable to class D in learning. This is evident from the level of attendance and liveliness in the classroom. So the alleged that the results of learning will cause a difference. Therefore, this study was conducted to compare differences in learning outcomes Basic Statistics before and after using the practice method in the Department of Tadris English class C and D; as well as comparing the differences in learning outcomes Basic Statistics using the class practice method C and D. Both classes are experimental classes that are independent with the treatment given that the basic statistical learning with the practice method so that it includes the type of quantitative comparational research. Homogeneity test results of two homogeneous class with p_v>α. The result of t test of the correlated sample that derived from the comparison of UTS value with UAS of both classes has increased significantly with the value of p_v<α. The free sample t test results obtained that the learning outcomes of the two classes are significantly different for both UTS and UAS values p_v<α. Class C has an average value of UTS greater than class D; but on the contrary the average grade of UAS class D is bigger than class C. It can be said that class C is more master of manual calculation theory, while class D is more master of SPSS practice","PeriodicalId":31356,"journal":{"name":"Kalamatika","volume":"2 1","pages":"105-116"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kalamatika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22236/KALAMATIKA.vol2no2.2017pp105-116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Tadris English Department 2015/2016 consists of 4 classes, but only 2 classes (C and D) using the practicum method in Basic Statistics learning. Class C and D Department of Tadris English has different characteristics. Class C is more preferable to class D in learning. This is evident from the level of attendance and liveliness in the classroom. So the alleged that the results of learning will cause a difference. Therefore, this study was conducted to compare differences in learning outcomes Basic Statistics before and after using the practice method in the Department of Tadris English class C and D; as well as comparing the differences in learning outcomes Basic Statistics using the class practice method C and D. Both classes are experimental classes that are independent with the treatment given that the basic statistical learning with the practice method so that it includes the type of quantitative comparational research. Homogeneity test results of two homogeneous class with p_v>α. The result of t test of the correlated sample that derived from the comparison of UTS value with UAS of both classes has increased significantly with the value of p_v<α. The free sample t test results obtained that the learning outcomes of the two classes are significantly different for both UTS and UAS values p_v<α. Class C has an average value of UTS greater than class D; but on the contrary the average grade of UAS class D is bigger than class C. It can be said that class C is more master of manual calculation theory, while class D is more master of SPSS practice
实用方法的统计学习控制
2015/2016学年塔德里斯英语系共有4个班,但只有2个班(C班和D班)采用基础统计学的实习方式学习。塔得里斯英语C班和D班各具特色。在学习方面,C班比D班更可取。从出勤率和课堂上的活跃程度可以看出这一点。所以声称学习的结果会造成差异。因此,本研究对塔德里斯英语C、D班采用实践方法前后学习成果的差异进行比较;以及比较基础统计学使用课堂实践方法C和d的学习结果差异。这两个班都是独立的实验班,并给予基础统计学使用实践方法学习的处理,因此它包含了定量比较研究的类型。具有p_v>α的两个齐次类的齐性检验结果。UTS值与两类的UAS比较得出的相关样本的t检验结果随着p_v<α的值显著增加。自由样本t检验结果显示,当UTS和UAS值p_v<α时,两班学生的学习效果均有显著差异。C类的平均值大于D类;而相反,UAS D班的平均成绩要大于C班。可以说,C班更精通手工计算理论,而D班更精通SPSS实践
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信