{"title":"Pre-Linnaean Plant Sexualities in England and France, c. 1670–1720","authors":"J. Begley","doi":"10.1353/esp.2022.0042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:This article explores some of the analogies that botanists in England and France developed between c. 1670-1720 to demonstrate that plants reproduce sexually. By delving into the contributions of several understudied figures, I seek to show that plant sexuality was neither the grand discovery of Rudolf Jakob Camerarius, as scholars have often supposed, nor a monolithic stance that provided an obvious taxonomical foundation. While Carl Linnaeus ordered plants according to their marital status, earlier botanists mostly analogized plants to \"lower\" animals, and, accordingly, even the most flamboyant among them avoided the charges of irreligion that beset Linnaeus.","PeriodicalId":54063,"journal":{"name":"ESPRIT CREATEUR","volume":"62 1","pages":"40 - 55"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ESPRIT CREATEUR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/esp.2022.0042","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, ROMANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
abstract:This article explores some of the analogies that botanists in England and France developed between c. 1670-1720 to demonstrate that plants reproduce sexually. By delving into the contributions of several understudied figures, I seek to show that plant sexuality was neither the grand discovery of Rudolf Jakob Camerarius, as scholars have often supposed, nor a monolithic stance that provided an obvious taxonomical foundation. While Carl Linnaeus ordered plants according to their marital status, earlier botanists mostly analogized plants to "lower" animals, and, accordingly, even the most flamboyant among them avoided the charges of irreligion that beset Linnaeus.
本文探讨了1670-1720年间英国和法国植物学家为证明植物有性繁殖而提出的一些类比。通过深入研究几个未被充分研究的人物的贡献,我试图表明,植物的性别既不是学者们经常认为的鲁道夫·雅各布·卡梅留留斯(Rudolf Jakob Camerarius)的重大发现,也不是提供明显分类学基础的单一立场。卡尔·林奈根据植物的婚姻状况对它们进行分类,而早期的植物学家大多把植物比作“低等”动物,因此,即使是最华丽的植物也避免了困扰林奈的“无宗教信仰”的指控。
期刊介绍:
For more than forty years, L"Esprit Créateur has published studies on French and Francophone literature, film, criticism, and culture. The journal features articles representing a variety of methodologies and critical approaches. Exploring all periods of French literature and thought, L"Esprit Créateur focuses on topics that define French and Francophone Studies today.