With a Little Help from My Friends? Surviving the Lockdown Using Social Networks in Rural South India

Q3 Social Sciences
Isabelle Guérin, C. Nordman, Cécile Mouchel
{"title":"With a Little Help from My Friends? Surviving the Lockdown Using Social Networks in Rural South India","authors":"Isabelle Guérin, C. Nordman, Cécile Mouchel","doi":"10.4000/samaj.8309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"How have rural populations in India mobilized their social networks in times of forced \"social distancing\"? Focusing on a rural region in Tamil Nadu, mixing Social Network Analysis, descriptive statistics and qualitative interviews conducted before the lockdown, during the lockdown and its aftermath, this paper shows that kinship ties and caste-based relationships are still used as inescapable economic resources, especially when it comes to surviving in this unprecedented worldwide economic and social crisis. The region under study has undergone profound changes in recent decades, combining the disappearance of agrarian forms of dependency and the strengthening of intra-caste interdependence among the lower-caste group (measured here in terms of homophily and homogeneity) with a focus on access to credit and self-help to access employment. The crisis is putting these social networks to the test. Subsidized food, the main pro-poor measure of the Indian government, prevented famine, even if it did not prevent severe malnutrition. Although kin and caste solidarity played a key role in helping households survive, they did not prevent the resurgence of old forms of patronage. © OpenEditions Journals. All Rights Reserved.","PeriodicalId":36326,"journal":{"name":"South Asia Multidisciplinary Academic Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South Asia Multidisciplinary Academic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4000/samaj.8309","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

How have rural populations in India mobilized their social networks in times of forced "social distancing"? Focusing on a rural region in Tamil Nadu, mixing Social Network Analysis, descriptive statistics and qualitative interviews conducted before the lockdown, during the lockdown and its aftermath, this paper shows that kinship ties and caste-based relationships are still used as inescapable economic resources, especially when it comes to surviving in this unprecedented worldwide economic and social crisis. The region under study has undergone profound changes in recent decades, combining the disappearance of agrarian forms of dependency and the strengthening of intra-caste interdependence among the lower-caste group (measured here in terms of homophily and homogeneity) with a focus on access to credit and self-help to access employment. The crisis is putting these social networks to the test. Subsidized food, the main pro-poor measure of the Indian government, prevented famine, even if it did not prevent severe malnutrition. Although kin and caste solidarity played a key role in helping households survive, they did not prevent the resurgence of old forms of patronage. © OpenEditions Journals. All Rights Reserved.
在朋友们的帮助下?利用社交网络在南印度农村度过封锁期
在被迫“保持社交距离”的时代,印度农村人口是如何动员他们的社交网络的?本文以泰米尔纳德邦的一个农村地区为研究对象,结合社会网络分析、描述性统计和封锁前、封锁期间及其后进行的定性采访,表明亲属关系和种姓关系仍然被用作不可避免的经济资源,尤其是当涉及到在这场前所未有的全球经济和社会危机中生存时。近几十年来,所研究的地区发生了深刻的变化,农业依赖形式的消失和低种姓群体之间种姓内相互依存关系的加强(此处以同质性和同质性衡量)与获得信贷和自助就业的重点相结合。这场危机正在考验这些社交网络。补贴食品是印度政府的主要扶贫措施,它防止了饥荒,即使它不能防止严重的营养不良。尽管亲属和种姓团结在帮助家庭生存方面发挥了关键作用,但它们并没有阻止旧形式的庇护死灰复燃。©OpenEditions期刊。保留所有权利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
South Asia Multidisciplinary Academic Journal
South Asia Multidisciplinary Academic Journal Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
32 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信